Several comments in this thread (and others) regarding Michigan/Oklahoma/Rutgers, ATM, et. al. I'm not all that bothered about the selections, but maybe because I expected U-M to be in and figured OU wouldn't ... I'm NOT claiming my projection/assessment was more valid, only that it didn't shock to me.
Had it gone the other way, I probably wouldn't have questioned it too much, either.
If I were the entire committee, I wouldn't have chosen Rutgers, but I was fairly certain it'd happen ... that's a weird/challenging resume to assess; positives are a shoo-in, lowlights are yecch.