Except you are discounting how the academies screen in Europe and South America. I have been in Brazil and watched the screening process of young athletes at sporting clubs. There is in fact selection for sport based on speed, size, and every other measurable.I’m getting lost with all the ways this has gone. And different people.
Long story short the US lost not due to athletes playing football or basketball but due to a lack of skills and techniques learned from a young age in Europe and elseware.
If we didn’t gatekeep that kind of training behind a very high paywall in many cases we could catch up to Europe with the athletes we already have.
Providing those athletes with that level of resources from an early age would level the playing field greatly.
By default almost all pro athletes are obv great athletes it’s kinda implied. What I was doing a piss poor job of saying is that unlike football and basketball that take those to the absolute extreme to be allowed to compete you can still be an incurable football player without some of those skills relative to their peers. You can be a little slower and still have a place in soccer, yes on defense. You can still have less endurance and have a role. You can have less agility etc and still find a place and obv the sport isn’t size or height dependent as football and basketball are.
Yeah I know TLDR
What you are saying is illogical. If the best athletes are given the same training aren't they inherently more
Likely to be a better footballer.
Come on. This "hard work beats talent" fantasy is that talented folks don't train hard. Your logic is flawed and your experience is weak.