Lindell Wigginton

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,312
79,265
113
DSM
It will be interesting to see how next year's team performs = young and talented on the perimeter, with ?? at the 4-5. I hope they exceed expectations, we're due if this year's team continues to struggle with our senior laden backcourt and questionable 4-5 play.

There's no question at one of those spots. Whichever spot Solomon Young plays won't be a question at all.

I don't expect to make the tourney next year, but I say it all of the time; making the tourney as a P5 team has never been easier in the history of the tournament as it is right now.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: srjclone

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
There's no question at one of those spots. Whichever spot Solomon Young plays won't be a question at all.

I don't expect to make the tourney next year, but I say it all of the time; making the tourney as a P5 team has never been easier in the history of the tournament as it is right now.

I think Lindell can start from the get-go, possibly? I mean, we're going to be inexperienced anyways, just as well throw him into the fire since he practices and plays against a lot of high level competition this year, as far as prep schools go. Agree on not expecting to make the tourney next year. I think we'll be similar to Texas this year. Young talent but a work in progress.
 

Beyerball

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 18, 2013
7,472
6,809
113
Texas
I think Lindell can start from the get-go, possibly? I mean, we're going to be inexperienced anyways, just as well throw him into the fire since he practices and plays against a lot of high level competition this year, as far as prep schools go. Agree on not expecting to make the tourney next year. I think we'll be similar to Texas this year. Young talent but a work in progress.


Wigginton starts the first day of practice..Unless for some odd reason we bring in some stud grad transfer at PG which I highly doubt.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,312
79,265
113
DSM
Wigginton starts the first day of practice..Unless for some odd reason we bring in some stud grad transfer at PG which I highly doubt.

I know people have a big hard on for bigs but if we bring in a 5th year next year I'd rather it be at guard.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,781
62,291
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Agreed, although I understand that there will be a lapse, for some reason I am more excited for next years team (already) than most in the past. Maybe it is because I really like the players we have coming in, or because it is the first year of true uncertainty, either way I am excited to see what the future holds

Years where there are a lot of new faces, few huge expectations but a lot of potential can be really fun. Will they come right out of the gate and surprise? Will they start slow but pick up steam as they get used to playing each other? It should be a lot of fun.
 

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
I know people have a big hard on for bigs but if we bring in a 5th year next year I'd rather it be at guard.

Can we get both? lol. What 'type' of guard specifically? Just curious. True..... even tho we have Donovan, Wigginton, Babb, McNeil, and Long it is still pretty inexperienced.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,781
62,291
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Honestly, I'm more excited about next year than the remainder of 2017.

Back-court looks more like a reload than a rebuild.
Plus we add length w/ Lewis that we've been missing.

I have no reason to believe Young in year two and Lard in one.five aren't a substantial upgrade from our current front-court.

I really appreciate how Prohm doesn't rush to fill his class.
2017 really only needs a grad transfer post a little more serviceable than this year's crop.
To be fair to Bowie I think if he could find a way to not foul constantly he'd be solid.

Then in 2018 if we can hit big on a true point and continue adding a good HS post annually we're going to be scary for the foreseeable future.

Bowie is really good for who he is. He just doesn't fill the main hole in our roster. I think we'd be pleased if we had just needed him as a 4.
 

Beyerball

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 18, 2013
7,472
6,809
113
Texas
I think next years team is going to surprise alot of people..Prohm is building a program built on athletic players who excel in HS at defense. McNeil is very good perimeter defender by all accounts. D jackson is pretty solid defender....as is Babb. Wigginton can defend well etc..
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,312
79,265
113
DSM
Can we get both? lol. What 'type' of guard specifically? Just curious. True..... even tho we have Donovan, Wigginton, Babb, McNeil, and Long it is still pretty inexperienced.

Depends on what happens with JUCO's in the spring. Just a P5 guard with experience. I'm thinking like Spike Albrecht. A 3 point shooter more than a PG but still okay to run the PG.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: coolerifyoudid

Stewo

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2008
16,856
14,812
113
Iowa
I think next years team is going to surprise alot of people..Prohm is building a program built on athletic players who excel in HS at defense. McNeil is very good perimeter defender by all accounts. D jackson is pretty solid defender....as is Babb. Wigginton can defend well etc..

One year from right now, I have little doubt that we'll be a better team overall. We're going to experience growing pains the first half of the season, certainly, but I have little reason to believe that we won't be better. Now, that may not translate to wins due to youth and inexperience, but as a whole, we'll be better. I'm putting lots of stock into Prohm's ability to coach here.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,781
62,291
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
One year from right now, I have little doubt that we'll be a better team overall. We're going to experience growing pains the first half of the season, certainly, but I have little reason to believe that we won't be better. Now, that may not translate to wins due to youth and inexperience, but as a whole, we'll be better. I'm putting lots of stock into Prohm's ability to coach here.

I'd have a hard time expecting us to be better. We may be more balanced, which could translate to more wins, but who knows? Two years from now, we certainly could as we'll have some experience and a lot of talent.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

Rabbuk

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2011
56,961
46,116
113
That bone guy is a freshman who was similarly ranked to wigginton and plays effectively for TCU.
 

Stewo

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2008
16,856
14,812
113
Iowa
I'd have a hard time expecting us to be better. We may be more balanced, which could translate to more wins, but who knows? Two years from now, we certainly could as we'll have some experience and a lot of talent.

I feel like next year we'll have a more "complete" basketball roster. That to me is a big reason why I feel the way I do. Plus, there's just a lot of talent coming in.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isucy86

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,312
79,265
113
DSM
I feel like next year we'll have a more "complete" basketball roster. That to me is a big reason why I feel the way I do. Plus, there's just a lot of talent coming in.

I don't know how you have a "complete" roster without an even partially proven scorer at this level.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,781
62,291
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
I feel like next year we'll have a more "complete" basketball roster. That to me is a big reason why I feel the way I do. Plus, there's just a lot of talent coming in.

It definitely should be more complete. It will also "look" more like a Steve Prohm team and give us a taste of what his teams truly will play like (allowing for some time to acclimate and learn the system).
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
Bowie is really good for who he is. He just doesn't fill the main hole in our roster. I think we'd be pleased if we had just needed him as a 4.
Very true. Bowie is an asset and can help most Big 12 teams. He just isn't a 5, particularly if we're going to play a halfcourt game. Imo he has some potential in being the mismatch we try to get from Burton. When Burton is off Bowie becomes even more important.

Prohm has quite the challenge in terms of how to get these guys to fit.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,781
62,291
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Very true. Bowie is an asset and can help most Big 12 teams. He just isn't a 5, particularly if we're going to play a halfcourt game. Imo he has some potential in being the mismatch we try to get from Burton. When Burton is off Bowie becomes even more important.

Prohm has quite the challenge in terms of how to get these guys to fit.

In a perfect world, had Lard been eligible, I think by now we would be seeing Lard/Young rotate at the 5, Burton/Bowie at the 4, and Babb would join the rotations 1-3 spots.
 

coolerifyoudid

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2013
17,312
27,026
113
KC
I know people have a big hard on for bigs but if we bring in a 5th year next year I'd rather it be at guard.

I'm sorta in the same boat. We lose a lot of ball security this year. Some experience in the backcourt would be nice because, IMO, turnovers are bound to go up next year. Monte's assist to turnover ratio is something we've come to expect recently versus something we have to strive for.

Experience doesn't automatically mean better, but it doesn't hurt when Huggy is throwing ten guys at you trying to get you rattled.
 
Last edited: