OMG, TCU, number 2 in the nation, might not score 60 if we did that.
I didn't say we would have a chance against TCU with my comments above, did I?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OMG, TCU, number 2 in the nation, might not score 60 if we did that.
Maybe we can use the barnwall for the kickers too since Paul said open competition.
This this thisSam must be the greatest practice QB ever, because a senior who consistently throws behind slants, out of bounds go routes, low and outside bubble screens and ****-poor decision making, would have been benched long ago.
Lanning threw in garbage time against a bad Texas Tech defense, but I thought he threw the ball quite well. Got rid of it quick, had good spin on the ball, and was accurate. WR's dropped two of his passes as well. ]/b]
I talked to someone within the program last year who told me if you put all the QB's together and had them runs drills for other college coaches, every college coach would take Lanning. Problem was what others have said, and that he doesn't have a clear grasp of what they want to do on offense. At this point though, I say you have to give him a shot to see what he can/can't do. I don't know if he is better than Sam, I just know what Sam is not. To be fair to Sam, he didn't coach the defense last week.
why in the hell didn't we go after a JC Qb?
I've heard some of the same about Lanning and I still think SR is better, even though he played poorly last week.
I'm less concerned about our QB and more concerned about our defense (who just gave up a school record for yards) with TCU and Baylor coming up the next two weeks.
Do we have to be last in defense again this year.I'm not concerned about the defense because there is no amount of schematic changes or personnel changes that is going to save us there. Might as well get used to getting 700+ yards hung up pretty much every week.
I'm not concerned about the defense because there is no amount of schematic changes or personnel changes that is going to save us there. Might as well get used to getting 700+ yards hung up pretty much every week.
why in the hell didn't we go after a JC Qb?
I don't agree with this. There are schematic changes that can/need to be made.
Lanning is not a high major QB. Theres a reason that we were his only QB offer. Hes a good athlete that almost everyone else projected to a different position.
Plus TT put up over 600 on TCU. We are not that far off on that side. A few adjustments and being in the game for more than 1.5 quarters would make a difference.