I know this meme gets passed around, but was the '19 team really the most talented in the conference?
I do not think so. Not really even close. I'll just use Texas Tech as an example.
Weiler-Babb = good college player, overseas player now
Haliburton = obviously turning into a monster, but he was a barely 18-year old freshman at the time
Shayok = had a cup of coffee in the NBA, D-League player
Horton-Tucker = similar to Haliburton... oozed talent but was still barely 18 years old at the time
Jacobson = okay college player with talent around him, overseas guy
---
Wigginton = D-League guy
Lard = obviously talented but a complete headcase, not sure where he even ended up
Compare that to Texas Tech that same year...
Mooney = fifth-year senior, ended up a D-League guy (so Mooney > Nick)
Moretti = now one of the better players in Europe
Culver = second-team AA, Big 12 CPOTY, lottery pick (6th overall)
Odiase = fifth-year senior, briefly in the D-League and now in Europe
Owens = fifth-year senior, now in the D-League
---
Francis = briefly in the D-League, now in Europe
Edwards = didn't find anything
Corprew = didn't find anything
That Texas Tech squad was more talented and experienced, top-to-bottom, than we were, especially considering that our two most talented players (Haliburton and Horton-Tucker) we just babies at the time.
You know how it is on the Internet, Chris --
Nuance isn't just rejected but actively resented. Trying to explain things just gets you a whiny "tl;dr" back.