When the team gets called for a penalty that the players and coaches don't immediately comprehend, alignments/plays have gotten too complicated. KISS.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Easy thereWhy the hell would he point backwards if he was trying to check if he was on the line? People seem to have this dumb idea they only check to be on the line. They check both on and off the line.
That’s my question though. Did the official just not confirm? Then the question should be should officials have to confirm how they are lined up. My opinion is if the receiver tries to confirm an official needs respond. The lines are no where as easy to tell as people make it out to be when on the field.Easy there
The official doesn't need to clarify or confirm. The guy at the end of a formation needs to look, asses, and maybe make an adjustment. Same for the TE or 'covered' up potential receivers ... look up the line.
It’s not the officials job to help the player lineup correctly though. If the player motions that he’s intending to play off the line the ref may give him the benefit of the doubt, but Scates was definitely on the line.That’s my question though. Did the official just not confirm? Then the question should be should officials have to confirm how they are lined up. My opinion is if the receiver tries to confirm an official needs respond. The lines are no where as easy to tell as people make it out to be when on the field.
That’s my question though. Did the official just not confirm? Then the question should be should officials have to confirm how they are lined up. My opinion is if the receiver tries to confirm an official needs respond. The lines are no where as easy to tell as people make it out to be when on the field.
In the Oklahoma game there was a play where Kolar was interfered with in the end zone but they called penalties on both sides saying the 88 (Kolar) was an ineligible receiver. I have watched that play several times and Kosar was clearly lined up off the line of scrimage. How could he be ruled ineligible?
Also in the OU game Kwangwu had along run called back for illegal alignment which I could not identify.
Rewatching the game right now and trying to understand the call on Allen on the first drive. Scates clearly checked in with the official that he was supposed to be off the line. I’ll be honest he looks on the line but my understanding is if they check they are good. Did the official tell him he was on the line and Scates didn’t do anything? Did the official just ignore him?
Why the hell would he point backwards if he was trying to check if he was on the line? People seem to have this dumb idea they only check to be on the line. They check both on and off the line.
A guy being on or off the LOS over a TE on his side isn’t complicated at all. Chances are as a WR if you see a TE on the LOS inside of you, you are supposed to be off the LOS 99.99% of the time. The TE could be wrong and is supposed to be off the LOS as an H-back, but if you see him on the LOS move back and the end result is the same.When the team gets called for a penalty that the players and coaches don't immediately comprehend, alignments/plays have gotten too complicated. KISS.
No one has ever once argued he wasn’t on the line. Scates for sure screwed up. He should have known he was on the line.Receivers rarely check to make sure they are off. You check to make sure you are on so you don't get penalized for not having at least seven guys on the line. No, it is not that hard to see where the line of scrimmage is as a receiver. Scates was obviously checking to make sure he was on. He wasn't pointing backwards either. He was pointing at the ref.
That’s my question though. Did the official just not confirm? Then the question should be should officials have to confirm how they are lined up. My opinion is if the receiver tries to confirm an official needs respond. The lines are no where as easy to tell as people make it out to be when on the field.
It looked on TV like Scates covered him.
Frankly, issues with formation/alignment comes down to coaching more than the players IMO. These guys shouldn't have issues wondering where they should be lined up at to begin with, these basics should be handled in the film room pretty quickly.
Just to reiterate. The officials "confirmation" before the snap doesn't mean ****.
See this would be fine. If Scates just didn’t listen then so be it. If Scates ignorantly thought he was off and tried to confirm it then I have a problem with that being ok.Officials are not obligated to help the WR's line up at all. As a courtesy, they will usually tell you if you are on the line (through high school anyhow. Sometimes for like Jr. High, might help with off ... but by the time you're in high school, you should be able to be off the line ... it's not hard.)
An official will tell the receiver if they ARE on the line ... the official is not supposed to indicate if the WR SHOULD be on the line.
There are some Jr. High and High school kids who really struggle with this for whatever reason. You can say "YOU ARE ON THE LINE" (knowing they shouldn't be, but can't coach them) 4 times and they just stare at you.
Or, there are kids that declare their intent but somehow do the opposite. Like, saying "I'm off!" but actually being on the line makes it ok?
My best guess is that Scates came out and lines up (clearly) on the line, said something like "I'm off!" (but he wasn't) and the official attempted to reply but Scates was zoned-in and either didn't hear or just didn't quickly process what was happening.
It "seems" like it should be easy but in the heat of the moment -- thinking of the route to run, if they need to block or not, trying to recall the formation specifics -- some guys just struggle more than others.
Film room and physical repetition.
I didn't watch yesterday but these are issues high school teams clean up by 2nd week with a super young team.
That’s the point I’m bringing up though.I think the officials should be required to confirm how they are lined up. They shouldn’t help them line up correctly but they should confirm if there is disagreement with the player and the official. It’s like if you ask a cop if something is illegal and then they arrest you for doing it.
See this would be fine. If Scates just didn’t listen then so be it. If Scates ignorantly thought he was off and tried to confirm it then I have a problem with that being ok.
Why the hell would he point backwards if he was trying to check if he was on the line? People seem to have this dumb idea they only check to be on the line. They check both on and off the line.