Except it doesRight, I'm just saying it won't make a difference with bowl placement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except it doesRight, I'm just saying it won't make a difference with bowl placement.
Everything about it counts. The win/loss, the stats, towards the redshirt rule. Everything.
Except it does
Hmm. But what about something like this:
Team A plays Drake. Team A beats Drake and finishes the season 6-6. NCAA says you aren't eligible for bowl game because they aren't a quality opponent (as defined in previous posts in this thread). NCAA allows teams with 6 wins top play in bowl game, but that 6th win doesn't count as one. Team A stays home for the bowl season.
Team B plays Drake. Team B beats Drake and finishes the season 10-2.
You're saying Team B will be looked at as a 10 win team, and the Drake game does now count and is considered for bowl resume to possibly go to a better game? In one scenario the win is considered and the other isn't?
Hmm. But what about something like this:
Team A plays Drake. Team A beats Drake and finishes the season 6-6. NCAA says you aren't eligible for bowl game because they aren't a quality opponent (as defined in previous posts in this thread). NCAA allows teams with 6 wins top play in bowl game, but that 6th win doesn't count as one. Team A stays home for the bowl season.
Team B plays Drake. Team B beats Drake and finishes the season 10-2.
You're saying Team B will be looked at as a 10 win team, and the Drake game does now count and is considered for bowl resume to possibly go to a better game? In one scenario the win is considered and the other isn't?
Yes.Hmm. But what about something like this:
Team A plays Drake. Team A beats Drake and finishes the season 6-6. NCAA says you aren't eligible for bowl game because they aren't a quality opponent (as defined in previous posts in this thread). NCAA allows teams with 6 wins top play in bowl game, but that 6th win doesn't count as one. Team A stays home for the bowl season.
Team B plays Drake. Team B beats Drake and finishes the season 10-2.
You're saying Team B will be looked at as a 10 win team, and the Drake game does now count and is considered for bowl resume to possibly go to a better game? In one scenario the win is considered and the other isn't?
The NCAA states to be bowl eligible you have to have 6 wins against teams that qualify.
So let’s say an independent team with no conference games decides to schedule 12 games against teams like Hamilton County Polytechnic school for the deaf-jewel satellite campus and wins all 12 games. They would still be 12-0 in the eyes of the ncaa, but they wouldn’t be bowl eligible because they would have zero qualifying wins.
The NCAA states to be bowl eligible you have to have 6 wins against teams that qualify.
So let’s say an independent team with no conference games decides to schedule 12 games against teams like Hamilton County Polytechnic school for the deaf-jewel satellite campus and wins all 12 games. They would still be 12-0 in the eyes of the ncaa, but they wouldn’t be bowl eligible because they wouldn’t have zero qualifying wins.
Yes, I agree with this 100%.
This thread went further than I anticipated haha.I'll just leave it at this: I fully understand the comments about a team already being bowl eligible. I'm not saying they wouldn't be eligible when at or above 6 wins from qualifying teams (really don't think anybody is interpreting it as this, but not sure). My only point of friction is that if a win isn't good enough to get you from not bowl eligible to bowl eligible, it doesn't make a ton of sense to me that it would be considered to boost you (in terms of a bowl team resume) when already bowl eligible. Drake is the Hamilton County Polytechnic school for the deaf-jewel satellite campus (bravo on the name haha) in the NCAA's eyes in that they don't deem them as a qualifying win. If everything else counts (win/loss/stats/redshirt rule), feels like the win should be a qualifying win that could send a team bowling. If it isn't good enough for them to count as qualifying win, then seems more like an exhibition scrimmage where nothing goes into official record books.
That's all![]()
and a bonus for eight wins!!!I agree it’s not ideal, I really don’t think we would’ve scheduled this game prior to the change in the redshirt rules. I think CMC wants to get every eligible player in a game once a year for developmental purposes and as a reward for the hard work throughout the year.
I would like to publicly apologize to everyone, excluding cyrocksmypants.