How was your day?

You're right. I didn't see that. Will edit post.

The lady in red shirt is his wife? Look like she is jogging by; I thought the lady in grey with the crate was his wife.

I don't think its a bobcat at all, and its likely a neighbors cat. Angry or not, throwing someones cat like that is totally unnecessary.
If an animal charged at my wife or kid or my dog like that, throwing it would be the kindest outcome you could expect from me
 
Last edited:
Animal abuse is a felony in 49 states (not Iowa - write your congressman).

Strongly believe this is a cat, not a bobcat.

Exhibit A-- Who picks up a hissing strange cat? Almost no one. You know who picks up a hissing spitting BOBCAT? Absolutely no one.

Exhibit B -- Note how the jogging lady in red comes back, looking to corral it? It's a pet they were trying to get back. If it was a wild bobcat they would have ran in the house and hid.

Lastly, if your neighbor picked up your cat (or small dog) and tossed it across the yard, what would your response be? Even given that the animal was hissing, spitting (or barking)?


Edited post after rewatching the video per Janny.
I'll be the first one to respond to your edit, which was barely better than your original. First, I just watched it full screen and it is definitely a bobcat. Second, whether it's a bobcat or a housecat, it attacked his wife (most likely trying to attack whatever was in the crate) so no animal abuse law would be in play up to and including if he killed it. Finally, both of your "exhibits" are based on the idea that people are so terrified of wild animals that they would run rather than help the first woman. The second woman came to help scare it off after the guy threw it, how many people do you know that aggressively run at their pets yelling "GO!" to "try and get them back?"
 
I'll be the first one to respond to your edit, which was barely better than your original. First, I just watched it full screen and it is definitely a bobcat. Second, whether it's a bobcat or a housecat, it attacked his wife (most likely trying to attack whatever was in the crate) so no animal abuse law would be in play up to and including if he killed it. Finally, both of your "exhibits" are based on the idea that people are so terrified of wild animals that they would run rather than help the first woman. The second woman came to help scare it off after the guy threw it, how many people do you know that aggressively run at their pets yelling "GO!" to "try and get them back?"

When I see an angry wild animal, my first instinct is always to pick it up and hold it in front of my face. No safer way to deal with wildlife, really.

Exhibit A is based on the concept that people don't pick up angry wild animals, not that they won't help someone else. You kick at it or yell/threaten, but you don't pick the thing up. You ever picked up an angry raccoon when it was trapped in your garage or garbage cans? I feel like this is a fairly reasonable assumption to make.

Exhibit B I will walk back - I have no audio so what you're saying is reasonable.

As far as cat or bobcat, I think you can see the tail when he first throws it. Also don't think it is large enough. Combined with the fact he grabbed it, I don't think its a bobcat. Full screen it is seriously blurry. Maybe we have some DNR guys on here that can weigh in.

Honestly, if it didn't take off running after being thrown, I'd think it was all staged.

My edit did not say his action was abuse, I changed that. I did reaffirm that animal abuse is not a felony in Iowa. Animal torture is also not a felony in Iowa. Google "puppy kimble abuse" for more, this was near and dear to me recently so I am a little sensitive to people hurting animals this week. People suck.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: cstrunk
When I see an angry wild animal, my first instinct is always to pick it up and hold it in front of my face. No safer way to deal with wildlife, really.

Exhibit A is based on the concept that people don't pick up angry wild animals, not that they won't help someone else. You kick at it or yell/threaten, but you don't pick the thing up. You ever picked up an angry raccoon when it was trapped in your garage or garbage cans? I feel like this is a fairly reasonable assumption to make.

Exhibit B I will walk back - I have no audio so what you're saying is reasonable.

As far as cat or bobcat, I think you can see the tail when he first throws it. Also don't think it is large enough. Combined with the fact he grabbed it, I don't think its a bobcat. Full screen it is seriously blurry. Maybe we have some DNR guys on here that can weigh in.

Honestly, if it didn't take off running after being thrown, I'd think it was all staged.

My edit did not say his action was abuse, I changed that. I did reaffirm that animal abuse is not a felony in Iowa. Animal torture is also not a felony in Iowa. Google "puppy kimble abuse" for more, this was near and dear to me recently so I am a little sensitive to people hurting animals this week. People suck.
I am probably the only person on this board that example doesn’t work with , I have picked up a wild raccoon on 2 separate occasions. On both occasions, I wasn’t thinking just reacting. It’s a normally reasonable assumption, but it’s also possible he felt he couldn’t kick it due to the confined space between cars or because it was so close to his wife and so his reaction was to pick it up to get it away from her. Him picking it up has no bearing on it being wild or not, imo.
 
When I see an angry wild animal, my first instinct is always to pick it up and hold it in front of my face. No safer way to deal with wildlife, really.

Exhibit A is based on the concept that people don't pick up angry wild animals, not that they won't help someone else. You kick at it or yell/threaten, but you don't pick the thing up. You ever picked up an angry raccoon when it was trapped in your garage or garbage cans? I feel like this is a fairly reasonable assumption to make.

Exhibit B I will walk back - I have no audio so what you're saying is reasonable.

As far as cat or bobcat, I think you can see the tail when he first throws it. Also don't think it is large enough. Combined with the fact he grabbed it, I don't think its a bobcat. Full screen it is seriously blurry. Maybe we have some DNR guys on here that can weigh in.

Honestly, if it didn't take off running after being thrown, I'd think it was all staged.

My edit did not say his action was abuse, I changed that. I did reaffirm that animal abuse is not a felony in Iowa. Animal torture is also not a felony in Iowa. Google "puppy kimble abuse" for more, this was near and dear to me recently so I am a little sensitive to people hurting animals this week. People suck.




They said it was a bobcat, not a lynx. Bobcats aren't always huge. Bobcats don't have "docked" looking tails all of the time. Their tails can get as long as almost half the length of a house cat's tail. It also had long legs. It was a bobcat.

If a bobcat was latched on to my wife's back I would grab it out of instinct if anything else. Not much else you could do. Also, once you grab that thing it's going to latch on to your hands/arms. They guy was trying to toss it the whole time, but it probably took awhile to get it off of his arms. Can't imagine how messed up his hands and arms were. LOL..
 
  • Agree
Reactions: nhclone
It became apparent to me that this gentleman knew what animal he was dealing with when he said “Ima git meh gun n shoot that ************”
 
  • Funny
Reactions: madguy30
First time I've listened to it. Makes quite a difference.

It's already been determined but that scream is a bobcat.
 
When I see an angry wild animal, my first instinct is always to pick it up and hold it in front of my face. No safer way to deal with wildlife, really.

Exhibit A is based on the concept that people don't pick up angry wild animals, not that they won't help someone else. You kick at it or yell/threaten, but you don't pick the thing up. You ever picked up an angry raccoon when it was trapped in your garage or garbage cans? I feel like this is a fairly reasonable assumption to make.

Exhibit B I will walk back - I have no audio so what you're saying is reasonable.

As far as cat or bobcat, I think you can see the tail when he first throws it. Also don't think it is large enough. Combined with the fact he grabbed it, I don't think its a bobcat. Full screen it is seriously blurry. Maybe we have some DNR guys on here that can weigh in.

Honestly, if it didn't take off running after being thrown, I'd think it was all staged.

My edit did not say his action was abuse, I changed that. I did reaffirm that animal abuse is not a felony in Iowa. Animal torture is also not a felony in Iowa. Google "puppy kimble abuse" for more, this was near and dear to me recently so I am a little sensitive to people hurting animals this week. People suck.
Now that the full story is out you should probably just admit how stupid your takes were.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron