Agree to disagree. Athletic profile certainly makes it more likely someone turns out to be a good football player but it's based on attributes not on actual production. Actually being a good football player is a different conversation.
I can agree that on paper (in theory) Oregon's players in general have a higher ceiling. I think that means very little in this game though. Both teams are well coached and the talent gap on the field isn't very wide at all. Two good teams.
I think Iowa State wins.
However, Iowa State’s athleticism comes at the expense of size or size comes at the expense of athleticism.
On defense, there’s few prototypes. On offense, it’s long but it’s at a cost. To be fair, there’s holes on Oregon’s offense. Oregon’s defense is just unfair if it get its act together.
There’s a reason that a dysfunctional Texas and OU are hard to put away. OU was a disaster fundamentally in that first game. One of the worst I saw this season.
This is just what I see. Take it for what it’s worth.
