This is the most annoying thing I have ever watched. All it is is Marv Albert and Grant Hill talking about Steve Kerr.
Kane has two more buckets now. Up to 7 points.
Kane has two more buckets now. Up to 7 points.
I wouldn't throw stones from a glass house.
I stick by my opinion. RIGHT NOW Kane is better than Nash. Saying otherwise is a "moronic" comment. Marshall had all his points and assists backing up Nash (who missed a lot of games due to injury... hmmmm). The Lakers also were down in most of their games, so any stats he put up are a little inflated. Disagreeing with that is a "moronic" comment.
listen man, there's no need to be a dbag. Were all clone fans. Am I little biased, sure, but I'm not blind. Marshall isn't great. Would they cut him for Kane? Not sure. They're not keeping Lin or Nash. Marshall isn't a long term answer. If Kane is good enough, keep him in the d league until you can dump Nash and let Lin's contract expire. I think he makes their d league, and then gets called up. Essentially making the roster.
First you say he is their starting PG and now you "think" he makes their D-League roster. I hope you see why no one ever takes you serious.
felt bad for kane last night that he was on the court with kendall marshall and jordan clarkson in some bizarre 3 PG lineup.
it was uncanny how similar it was watching kane struggle in that game a laker, just like matt thomas struggled as a frosh for us. two players who are used to having the ball in their hands, best players on their team, and suddenly they have to just stand in the corner/wing and hope they get a pass from their teammates. (good luck with that in nba summer league!).
In his defense, who is the best player at the position isn't usually the first reason why someone is or isn't on the roster. Contracts and publicity drive the boat just as much if not more so. They aren't going to pay Nash an ungodly salary and make him the third stringer whether he deserves to be or not. They aren't going to trade for Lin and then cut him whether he deserves to be or not. Kane MIGHT be better than them both (I am not saying he is) and stands basically no chance of being ahead of them on the depth chart. Kane is basically fighting Marshall and Clarkson for the 3rd PG role, which is a fight I think he will lose. Right now he isn't under contract with LA so he will get the chance to find a better option elsewhere. I just don't see it with LA any more now that they have Lin.First you say he is their starting PG and now you "think" he makes their D-League roster. I hope you see why no one ever takes you serious.
felt bad for kane last night that he was on the court with kendall marshall and jordan clarkson in some bizarre 3 PG lineup.
it was uncanny how similar it was watching kane struggle in that game a laker, just like matt thomas struggled as a frosh for us. two players who are used to having the ball in their hands, best players on their team, and suddenly they have to just stand in the corner/wing and hope they get a pass from their teammates. (good luck with that in nba summer league!).
That was first loss in 17 games for the GSW. The 3 headed monster did accomplish their mission.
I never said he would be. I said he could be. That's not far fetched for as bad as the Lakers are.
this is a forum. Nothing I say I think is fact. It's all predictions and opinions on certain subjects. If you can't see or understand that, then why are you here? Maybe you're just not smart enough. After all, that is, my opinion.
You trying to get something out of me, it's fine. I don't care. How about you stop so other people don't have to see it, cause its a bad look.
I understand it is your opinion, but your history of making far-fetched or even absurd statements make myself and others not take you serious. 99% of the time I ignore you but I was bored the other night when you first made your comment and decided to respond. We are all ISU fans, but most of us have the ability to think without the ISU blinders clouding our eyes.
Kane is a great player and will play professionally somewhere this years and years to come, but for you to think/say he is the second best on a team before even seeing him play is asinine. Plain and simple he is not at this point. Once he gets his feet wet he will lock on with a team and be fine. Like others have said, the Lakers are stuck with stupid contracts and will have to make moves for him to make the roster. Is it out of the realm of possibility...no, but it's a rather large long shot.
I can see both sides of the argument. We've all seen what Kane is able to do. However, he'll need the minutes to prove that and I just don't think he will get those minutes with the Lakers.
She is a great interviewer . . . actually knows Kane and Iowa State . . . asks questions we would want to ask.