Oh. His post was about the NYT so I assumed you did.Nope. I've seen enough from other outlets over the weeks.
Oh. His post was about the NYT so I assumed you did.Nope. I've seen enough from other outlets over the weeks.
Oh. His post was about the NYT so I assumed you did.
I seen quite a bit of NYT on twitter, just no full article access.
You can always believe what is on Twitter.
The treatment SBF has received from mainstream media has been awful. In some ways SBF is a far worse offender than Madoff ever was. The media has been extremely passive and even sympathetic at times to SBF. Best not to bite the hand that feeds I guess.
Remember that those invested in cryptocurrency have to convince the public that it is not a scam. Otherwise their investment is worthless. Anyone invest in Beanie Babies? Fake market scammed lots.
The media treatment has been unfavorable? Or inadequate?The treatment SBF has received from mainstream media has been awful.
Ah, the old generalization about "the media" and their complicity in some undefined conspiracy. Got it.In some ways SBF is a far worse offender than Madoff ever was. The media has been extremely passive and even sympathetic at times to SBF. Best not to bite the hand that feeds I guess.
Comparing actual currency to Beanie Babies.... we should all take investment advice from you. One clear statement before you try and defend yourself.Remember that those invested in cryptocurrency have to convince the public that it is not a scam. Otherwise their investment is worthless. Anyone invest in Beanie Babies? Fake market scammed lots.
God forbid that he be anything other than one-dimension: deplorable. No surprise that you would be butt-hurt over the NYT failure to adopt your specific point of view.
You obviously haven't been reading the NYT accounts of his fraudulent activity, and you said you don't subscribe. So stop talking about something you know little about. Like any good right-winger, you embrace ignorance and want to be mad about nothing.
Whatever. I'm done replying to your stupidity.
God forbid that he be anything other than one-dimension: deplorable. No surprise that you would be butt-hurt over the NYT failure to adopt your specific point of view.
You obviously haven't been reading the NYT accounts of his fraudulent activity, archiving an article from six weeks ago without acknowledging the many on this topic between then and now. You said you don't subscribe. I do. So stop talking about something you know little about. Like any good right-winger, you embrace ignorance and want to be mad about nothing.
Whatever. I'm done replying to your stupidity.
He has to be all in on Crypto, no way he is believing the **** he is saying if it wasn't the case. He is desperate for it too come through.
I had login pop ups on mobile and desktop.
This has already happened. Looks like you are already in the minority.
[URL
unfurl="true"]https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/11/cryptocurrency-us-midterms/[/URL]
What about my SBF comments do you not believe?
Ya thats all fine and swell. Everyone knows he is a scammer, so are most of the other ones you fail to mention
There are no central figures in bitcoin.
No schit.