I truly think Feazell is underrated. I think he has a pretty good amount of size, athleticism and touch.
My guess is he will end up playing like a top 80 guy.
My guess is he will end up playing like a top 80 guy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Had Pitt, Bama, Baylor, and Miss. St. as committable offers.
People were excited about SDW but not everybody pans out. Also, SDW was up against Naz and Matt for playing time. I'm not sure of the timing on the transfer but we also brought Cooke in the year after he left.
Agree with all of this. Feazell is a good candidate for a solid rotation guy on a top 30 team. Thats nothing to sneeze at.
so you brought it back up again in the afternoon to try and get a thread derailment?I brought up Cam Lard earlier this morning expecting a thread derailment but I was so wrong about the derailment topic.
I agree with what you are saying. But did you really just acronym his name? Already? And KeyShawn is the same name so no need for the S, even though it is capitalized in his name.Feazell development is far from done, he has the skills to contribute. I will defer to the Staff's rating of Keshawn in their system over scouts projecting players in 4 years.
Though it has been a small sample size the staff seems to have a good eye of talent and identifying younger lower rated prospect before they blowup and get national attention. Feazell was the top priority for the staff this year and the convinced him to come to Ames. Cyclone fans will enjoy watching him play in Hilton.
Ideally KSF will be on similar path as Ejim 3 star stretch PF who exceeds his ranking and was a great Cyclone. Nobody debates his ranking now though I assume his CF commitment thread had the some of the same doubter posts.
![]()
I feel like CSP is looking at how Baylors gotten it done over the years and is following that blueprint. Bring in athletic big guys that can change some shots in the lane, heck he's even stealing recruits from the them! Great pick up and great looking class already!
I agree with what you are saying. But did you really just acronym his name? Already? And KeyShawn is the same name so no need for the S, even though it is capitalized in his name.![]()
I brought up Cam Lard earlier this morning expecting a thread derailment but I was so wrong about the derailment topic.
I'd rather have a derailment on Lard than on Prohm vs Hoiberg.so you brought it back up again in the afternoon to try and get a thread derailment?
But 2 very different players.This is true if he holds up to his ranking. But history shows that a top 100 guy is much more of a sure thing than a top 150 guy. My confusion with people on here posting like he's a game changer is that guys who are marginal top 150 rarely become game changers (my initial search on this guy had a rating from 247 of 161). I think Sherron Dorsey-Walker was a very similar rating. I think his offers shows his ranking may be a bit lower than is justified to, so maybe we have a diamond in the rough.
I've been a member here since 2006 when the site started. You can look it up and confirm. You don't have to call people a troll just because you disagree.
I understand very well how recruiting works as I've followed it for the last 13 years
If you look up the players Fred brought in they were a lot of 4 stars compared to the 3 star players prohm is bringing in. I'm at work otherwise I'd list them out for you. Do your homework before you call people out.
Who cares where you start out, it's where you finish that counts. Kentucky constantly gets 4 and 5 star guys, how many National Championships have they won in the last 10 years.
I really think we should have to pass a drug test or an IQ test to post.
Who cares where you start out, it's where you finish that counts. Kentucky constantly gets 4 and 5 star guys, how many National Championships have they won in the last 10 years.
I really think we should have to past a drug test or an IQ test to post.