Bracketology 2024

If we stay 8th in the S curve and Purdue is the top seed we will be in the Midwest.

I think it is getting late to change the seeds for the top 8 teams.
Late? We could possibly have a win against the #1 team in the nation. It's a joke if the committee doesn't take the big12 conference championship game into consideration.
 
Basically they take 1-16 and assign them in order to where is best for them geographically without pairing them with a conference for. Basically that effects our placement with us not pairing with Houston and keeping Marquette away from UCONN.
Correct, and they they check the balance. Sum up the Top 4 seeds in each region and make sure no region is too high or too low.
 
When you’re in a tournament where it’s 6 games and loser go home - as opposed to a pro style series - the chances of repeating are really low even if you’re a dominant team for years long stretches. Also different than CFB where you’ve got two game tournament.
Sure, but we've had a repeat champion in the tournament pretty regularly every 20 years or so, and that's where we are at. It's going to happen again someday. Could be this year. UCONN is about as strong a candidate as you could ask for.
 
Late? We could possibly have a win against the #1 team in the nation. It's a joke if the committee doesn't take the big12 conference championship game into consideration.

I think the Big12 championship might still have an influence. They’ve said in the past that outside of automatic bids, the Sunday championships are too late to have any effect on the seeding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: exCYtable
Crazy that UConn is going to play in Brooklyn and Boston. Two virtual home sites.

Would be like us pulling some combination of Kansas City, Omaha and Minneapolis sites in the tourney. Except even closer and able to take a commuter train.
Lived in Hartford for a few years and it’s literally a two hour drive/ride (depending on traffic) to both Boston and NY. Right in the middle.
 
Correct, and they they check the balance. Sum up the Top 4 seeds in each region and make sure no region is too high or too low.
Doubt that would apply much. On the 1 line only UNC is any type of drop off and they'd likely be placed in the west with Arizona the probable overall 5. The rest of the 2 line is pretty even. 3s are going to be determined by avoiding conference foes on the 1 and 2 lines. Same for the 4s.

It really seems the best Westcoast team always has an advantage. If a one gets shipped in it will be the weakest one. If they are the one they get a 2 that couldn't secure a closer location.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mctallerton
Lived in Hartford for a few years and it’s literally a two hour drive/ride (depending on traffic) to both Boston and NY. Right in the middle.
Lived out here now for the past 14 years and this is spot on. Super easy to get to both. The UConn faithful prefer Madison Square Garden but they will gladly take Boston as a backup.
 
This is the dream scenario. #2 seed in the MW with Purdue as the top seed? Sign me up for that.
And look for Purdue to get bounced before the Elite 8. Although I think Big Rob would bang with Edey and Ward’s length would challenge him. Plus we would pressure the **** out of their guards like they haven’t seen. We would make it hard to throw that entry pass.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: exCYtable
Doubt that would apply much. On the 1 line only UNC is any type of drop off and they'd likely be placed in the west with Arizona the probable overall 5. The rest of the 2 line is pretty even. 3s are going to be determined by avoiding conference foes on the 1 and 2 lines. Same for the 4s.

It really seems the best Westcoast team always has an advantage. If a one gets shipped in it will be the weakest one. If they are the one they get a 2 that couldn't secure a closer location.
It's all math, not judgement
 
Its just seeding then placement.
Then they add up the seeds. They don't make a judgement that all 2 seeds are even. They would never have 1-5-9 in the same region. It's part of their documented principles.
 
Maybe it’s not relevant but I’d rather be a 3 or even a 4 (not happening, hypothetically speaking) in Omaha vs a 2 in some place like Spokane or wherever else.
 
Nope, like I have said, closest region first, keep conference opponents separate. Once that is done, check regional competitive balance
That should not apply for the top 2 lines.
West
UNC #4 overall gets shipped Arizona 2 seed
The rest is based on who gets the 5 overall.

Houston in the south will Marquette or Tennessee

UCONN in the East with us or Tennessee

Purdue in the MW with the highest remaining 2 seed. Detroit is the closest region for all 3 schools.
 
Still can't justify Arizona being above us in my mind.

Not a single Q1 game since February 10th, only 4 since January 1st. Yes, their non-con was tough, but that doesn't erase the fact that their entire conference season was mediocre competition.
They have some very questionable losses as well. We beat Houston today and it would be criminal to keep them above us.
 
Then they add up the seeds. They don't make a judgement that all 2 seeds are even. They would never have 1-5-9 in the same region. It's part of their documented principles.
I took that as a challenge and found you actually could meet the seeding criteria by going 1-5-9-16, 2-8-10-15, 3-7-11-14, and 4-6-12-13 -- all the regions are within 4 total seeds difference. But yeah, that'd never happen in real life, despite meeting the letter of the law.
 
Still can't justify Arizona being above us in my mind.

Not a single Q1 game since February 10th, only 4 since January 1st. Yes, their non-con was tough, but that doesn't erase the fact that their entire conference season was mediocre competition.
To make the counter argument, we played a tough conference schedule but that doesn't erase our entire non-con was horrible competition.