2025-2026 MBB computer projections thread

Kansas up to 15th in kenpom after last nights victory over Baylor. I think Kansas just might be starting to figure it out. Granted, losing like we did is never ideal, but they are a dangerous squad, and certainly so at home. We are still 3rd on kenpom as of this morning. Offense has taken a dip but if we can get this thing back on track the next couple weeks set up nicely for our revenge game against them at home. Go out today and show Cincinnati who we really are!
I felt a little better about our turd of a performance after Baylor got whipped too.
 
You’d think people in an analytics th

You’d think people in analytics themed thread would be smart enough not to make up a trend from something that happened literally just one year with an outlier number of injuries.

The real trend is this program is getting better every single year, there’s just a lot of luck and noise in year to year results.

Last years team could’ve been special without injuries. This team could be even better, but every year there are a number of contenders for conference, F4, title, whatever, and most don’t get lucky enough to do it.

What we do know is if TJ keeps up his trend, odds go up that one of these years is a hit. Look at the way guys perform vs their expectations, and then look at the trend in who he’s able to recruit.

- There’s 0 evidence for an “Otz lull.”
- There’s clear evidence the program is improving year over year, and outperforming resources and talent
- Weird $h!t happens in sports. Most “contenders” disappoint.
We're all diehard fans here. We all watch the games (some multiple times) and we all obsess over this stuff too much. There is absolutely evidence of an "Otz lull" - it's so weird to try to debate against this, as if you're being a better fan than someone who's frustrated that our numbers trend downward as the season goes on (and yes all 4 seasons count, injuries count, it all matters). Hell, even in the 2023-2024 season, our OE metrics did drastically decline during a crappy multi-week stretch from February into early March. It was literally discussed constantly on this very board how frustrating it was to - yet again - see our offensive look like total dogsh*t the further we got into conference play. Our defense was #1 in the country during this timespan, thankfully. And then they recovered for the Big 12 tourney, which was amazing.

AND at the same time, there is obviously/absolutely evidence that his program keeps getting better overall. Which is awesome. We are in great hands.

Neither are related.

As a fan, I love our team and coach, AND I want he and his staff to figure out why our offense sputters at times during this time of year (consistently - year after year, e.g., a very real lull) and figure out new ways to adjust to other teams' adjustments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rosshm16
I do think the offense can take better care of the basketball, improve its efficiency, and that that would lead to better defense. I don’t know that the team can get their metrics back to the top four—who would bet their hard-earned money that Iowa State demolishes even UCF?—so I’m very disappointed. I think at this point you forget about record and just hope you’re playing great ball come March
 
Last edited:
Torvik dropped the team to the #3 line after last week.

1768925763878.png

Out of morbid curiosity I wanted to see the "floor" -- assume an undefeated home slate but no more road wins. You might be able to imagine worse than that outcome, but I'm not going further.

1768925827095.png

We've "fallen back into the pack" a bit, certainly, which is going to make a #1 seed hard to achieve at this point, but the good news is we're getting into a slightly thicker slice of the distribution and competing for seed lines with other teams with a few blemishes on their record. So, things are looking up!

85-74 (84% win expectation) against the Golden Knights tonight.

Win this game. Defend the home court. Right the ship. Then we can go from there.
 
Torvik dropped the team to the #3 line after last week.

View attachment 166552

Out of morbid curiosity I wanted to see the "floor" -- assume an undefeated home slate but no more road wins. You might be able to imagine worse than that outcome, but I'm not going further.

View attachment 166553

We've "fallen back into the pack" a bit, certainly, which is going to make a #1 seed hard to achieve at this point, but the good news is we're getting into a slightly thicker slice of the distribution and competing for seed lines with other teams with a few blemishes on their record. So, things are looking up!

85-74 (84% win expectation) against the Golden Knights tonight.

Win this game. Defend the home court. Right the ship. Then we can go from there.

The way I see it you'd have to go 4-2, maybe even 5-1 against Baylor, Kansas, Houston, BYU, Tech, and Arizona to even sniff a 1 again. But my question analytics-wise is will you have to pound the UCFs and Kansas States now that you dropped a game you shouldn't have, or is a win a win at this point?
 
The way I see it you'd have to go 4-2, maybe even 5-1 against Baylor, Kansas, Houston, BYU, Tech, and Arizona to even sniff a 1 again. But my question analytics-wise is will you have to pound the UCFs and Kansas States now that you dropped a game you shouldn't have, or is a win a win at this point?

Winning big games is going to matter 100x more than pounding mid Big 12 teams.

The season is halfway over, so a lot of the sample size is already accounted for when it comes to how the computers are going to see you. And the computer ratings generally have a "mercy rule" parameter in them (some more than others, KenPom has a "weak" one while Torvik has a "strong" one) where the impact of margin of victory starts to degrade once it gets large enough if you try to run up the score.

I wouldn't worry about doing that at all.

I'd worry about winning all the games you should if you want to be a top-four seed.

And stealing as many Q1A wins as you can from high-level Big 12 peers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoodOleDays
Winning big games is going to matter 100x more than pounding mid Big 12 teams.

The season is halfway over, so a lot of the sample size is already accounted for when it comes to how the computers are going to see you. And the computer ratings generally have a "mercy rule" parameter in them (some more than others, KenPom has a "weak" one while Torvik has a "strong" one) where the impact of margin of victory starts to degrade once it gets large enough if you try to run up the score.

I wouldn't worry about doing that at all.

I'd worry about winning all the games you should if you want to be a top-four seed.

And stealing as many Q1A wins as you can from high-level Big 12 peers.

Okay, thanks. Well, that makes me feel a little better. If you have to scrape by Oklahoma State, TCU,... so be it