2022 Recruiting/Transfer Class

Halincandenza

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2018
9,434
10,262
113
You’re relying on hope imo. Projecting A10 and MVC combos (with the benefit of pgs) as giving adequate Big 12 pg play (without a pg), isnt more logical than an AAC full time pg being adequate. And the fit it worse on the former, given Green is our shooter and Williams the best pg defender.


Williams played pg full time in a conference basically Pac12 level. A lot of upside stemming from that being in a bad offense and having played just 3 more games than Hunter. We don’t limit what Hunter is going to be because he was the pg of a poor offense. He may not become what Hunter will become, but he should be similar to what Hunter was.

On the other hand, Green and Holmes were 4th year players, and at most, part time pgs, in lesser conferences. There’s nothing to suggest they’re more capable to handle the Big 12 pg duties. Two weak pgs don’t make 1 sufficient pg.

Holmes didn’t do a very good job as even part time pg. It’s one reason his numbers went down. In a worse conference than Williams and surrounded by better players . He’s not as good in PnR or as a facilitator. He is an okay instigator type. His TO numbers lower because he played MUCH less pg. Williams at pg had a TO number similar to Hunter. Holmes is not the pg defender either. Holmes at the 3 improves his footsteed


If our blind faith is that high on Holmes as a Big 12 combo, the real question is do you get better pg play from a lineup with Williams or Gabe? Shooting is a wash, although Gabe was the most harmful shooter in the conference given his volume. Defense is a wash as Williams is our best pg defender of the four.

What’s Bart Torvik do without Gabe in the starting lineup?
Agree to disagree. May be a moot point cause both Holmes and Williams could be starting if Green doesn't come to ISU. What is an instigator? Is he trying to start fights?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: CyPunch

PeteyPablo

Member
Apr 16, 2022
24
97
13
He was a starting PG on an meh team and wasn't great at it at. He has issues turning the ball over and you put him against Big 12 defenses and it is going to be even worse.
Holmes is a better player and he played point when Lofton was out and did a really good job in both facilitating and not turning the ball over.
Gabe isn't playing less.
I think you are way overrating Williams and what he will bring next year. Also, wouldn't say that Williams is a better defender than Holmes. Just for reference, when you take WIlliams off the team on Torvik, ISU gets better. Also, with Green, the projected top three contributors are Green, Holmes, and Kalscheur in that order. Williams is seventh.
He was pretty good at PG at Temple…on O and D…you couldn’t have seen him play..or that team for that matter..like 6 guys transferred down after this season because they weren’t good enough for the AAC..and he’s definitely a better defender than Holmes
 

Attachments

  • 7756CD5D-FF51-4102-B711-30C2B9AA4261.jpeg
    7756CD5D-FF51-4102-B711-30C2B9AA4261.jpeg
    959.6 KB · Views: 38

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,188
27,212
113
He was pretty good at PG at Temple…on O and D…you couldn’t have seen him play..or that team for that matter..like 6 guys transferred down after this season because they weren’t good enough for the AAC..and he’s definitely a better defender than Holmes
I think Williams is going to be better than some think. I also love that we get him for more than one year. I think he could develop very nicely.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
Agree to disagree. May be a moot point cause both Holmes and Williams could be starting if Green doesn't come to ISU.

What is an instigator?
What’s the ISU Bart Torvik rank if you start Williams, Green, Holmes compared to Green, Holmes, Gabe.

Some would say initiator. But I don’t see the offense being as good with Holmes defended as the primary ball handler, than it will be with Holmes (along with Green) exploiting the wing and off ball defenders once the pg initiated. Both those “combos” are guys that have the handle and scoring mindset to capitalize on a defense reacting more than they are facilitating and initiating the offense.
Which is good as the 3rd guard with Williams and Green, as Williams is not stuck having to do as much creating with the ball as Hunter.

Why make Holmes or Green worse, on defense and offense, just so you can add Gabe, a guard with poor handling, and poor shooting? Williams is a better defender than Holmes and will likely be asked to defend pgs. It’s either Gabe or Holmes imo.

Williams getting on ball screens (he’ll be good at PnR with Osun/Ward) or Williams-Kunc. Green will have to be covered. Defenses may risk Holmes being open or played off, but he’ll then go to work. “Good” Gabe will too

Watson at the 4 while King is out, with Kunc at 5, would be an interesting offense. Obviously green and Holmes will chip in on pg duties, but imo Holmes working against a set defense to pass to Gabe is inferior to Williams working against a set defense passing to Holmes imo
 
Last edited:

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,473
14,346
113
What’s the ISU Bart Torvik rank if you start Williams, Green, Holmes compared to Green, Holmes, Gabe.

Some would say initiator. But I don’t see the offense being as good with Holmes defended as the primary ball handler, than it will be with Holmes (along with Green) exploiting the wing and off ball defenders once the pg initiated. Both those “combos” are guys that have the handle and scoring mindset to capitalize on a defense reacting more than they are facilitating and initiating the offense.
Which is good as the 3rd guard with Williams and Green, as Williams is not stuck having to do as much creating with the ball as Hunter.

Why make Holmes or Green worse, on defense and offense, just so you can add Gabe, a guard with poor handling, and poor shooting? It’s either Gabe or Holmes imo.

Williams getting on ball screens (he’ll be good at PnR with Osun/Ward) or Williams-Kunc. Watson at the 4 while King is out, with Kunc at 5, would be an interesting offense.

TJ will figure it all out. He can Coach.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
TJ will figure it all out. He can Coach.
Neat. Logging off until next winter?

This is a discussion of what we think it’ll be when he figures it all out.

Hopefully when he does, it will be better than AdJO of 170.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,358
47,031
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
What’s the ISU Bart Torvik rank if you start Williams, Green, Holmes compared to Green, Holmes, Gabe.

Some would say initiator. But I don’t see the offense being as good with Holmes defended as the primary ball handler, than it will be with Holmes (along with Green) exploiting the wing and off ball defenders once the pg initiated. Both those “combos” are guys that have the handle and scoring mindset to capitalize on a defense reacting more than they are facilitating and initiating the offense.
Which is good as the 3rd guard with Williams and Green, as Williams is not stuck having to do as much creating with the ball as Hunter.

Why make Holmes or Green worse, on defense and offense, just so you can add Gabe, a guard with poor handling, and poor shooting? Williams is a better defender than Holmes and will likely be asked to defend pgs. It’s either Gabe or Holmes imo.

Williams getting on ball screens (he’ll be good at PnR with Osun/Ward) or Williams-Kunc. Green will have to be covered. Defenses may risk Holmes being open or played off, but he’ll then go to work. “Good” Gabe will too

Watson at the 4 while King is out, with Kunc at 5, would be an interesting offense. Obviously green and Holmes will chip in on pg duties, but imo Holmes working against a set defense to pass to Gabe is inferior to Williams working against a set defense passing to Holmes imo
I think the PG conversation comes down to what TJ/KG think AJG's ceiling is and what his feedback from NBA scouts is.

If the scouts think he needs to be a PG at the next level (no idea if that's the case or not), and TJ/KG think he can be a BigXII PG, then I could see them running with AJG at the point, backed up by Williams.

If the feedback is he needs to be a dominant wing - then I think Williams starts. I don't see Holmes as a PG at all.

Either way, I do think AJG has the ball in his hand a ton on offense - especially in PnR / late clock situations - so in some ways it almost doesn't matter who is the PG
 

Tpups21

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
1,777
2,431
113
44
West Des Moines, IA
I think the PG conversation comes down to what TJ/KG think AJG's ceiling is and what his feedback from NBA scouts is.

If the scouts think he needs to be a PG at the next level (no idea if that's the case or not), and TJ/KG think he can be a BigXII PG, then I could see them running with AJG at the point, backed up by Williams.

If the feedback is he needs to be a dominant wing - then I think Williams starts. I don't see Holmes as a PG at all.

Either way, I do think AJG has the ball in his hand a ton on offense - especially in PnR / late clock situations - so in some ways it almost doesn't matter who is the PG
Are you sure Green is coming to ISU?
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
He was pretty good at PG at Temple…on O and D…you couldn’t have seen him play..or that team for that matter..like 6 guys transferred down after this season because they weren’t good enough for the AAC..and he’s definitely a better defender than Holmes
Would have been great to add to Hunter-Green like initially planned.

I was at first tepid on a poor shooting pg when we had Hunter and a full spring ahead, thinking it mostly a move about 2023-24. I thought he could be an okay starter, but with Hunter that wouldn’t result in much pt.

But an athletic 6’5” pg with good defense and three years to play just too safe of bet to pass on.

I thought we would have gone after more pgs after Hunter left. We certainly had the role to sell. Ideally a pg that could shoot. The fact we didn’t says a lot about Williams
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeteyPablo

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,358
47,031
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Are you sure Green is coming to ISU?
No, but for purposes of this conversation it was assumed. The PG / Guard alignment is much more straightforward if he's not here - and Lipsey / EKing will probably play 20 minutes a game (unless there's another transfer)
 

Tpups21

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
1,777
2,431
113
44
West Des Moines, IA
No, but for purposes of this conversation it was assumed. The PG / Guard alignment is much more straightforward if he's not here - and Lipsey / EKing will probably play 20 minutes a game (unless there's another transfer)
Been some buzz today that Green is headed to Duke. Might be just pure speculation with Joey Baker leaving.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,358
47,031
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Been some buzz today that Green is headed to Duke. Might be just pure speculation with Joey Baker leaving.
Green is on an official visit to Duke today - thus the buzz. Also he stated multiple times at the G-League combine that he's deciding between NBA, Duke and ISU
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
I think the PG conversation comes down to what TJ/KG think AJG's ceiling is and what his feedback from NBA scouts is.

If the scouts think he needs to be a PG at the next level (no idea if that's the case or not), and TJ/KG think he can be a BigXII PG, then I could see them running with AJG at the point, backed up by Williams.

If the feedback is he needs to be a dominant wing - then I think Williams starts. I don't see Holmes as a PG at all.

Either way, I do think AJG has the ball in his hand a ton on offense - especially in PnR / late clock situations - so in some ways it almost doesn't matter who is the PG

I’m guessing TJ’s plan is to go with whatever is best for the team. Given the plan was to add Green even before Hunter left, the staff seems okay with adding Green and letting the players do what they’re best suited to do in the Big 12.

I doubt the feedback of NBA scouts has any causation in terms of our rotation and play, although there could be correlation. If AJG needs to show something that he can’t do as well here as his teammates can, he won’t be here. I don’t know what role he’d play at Duke. Is it overlap with pg?

I personally think Williams is a better fit in that regard, as you’re saying. It likely to means AJG gets the best of both. He can be as much or as little of pg as his talent will allow. Although with Hunter, if AJG isn’t ready to be a Big 12 pg, you can more readily hide it. No one would ask why didn’t he play more pg when joining his dad to try and make a run in his last season - a lot of plausible deniability

Was it better Prohm left scouts guessing whether Wigginton could be a pg, rather than to show them he wasn’t? Or if Prohm forces LW at pg, does he get drafted and we’re better? I think the former.
Luckily, the staff-player discussion on that will be better this time
 
Last edited: