2015 Defensive Depth Chart - We will be better, much better.

If having no tolerance for domestic violence puts me on my high horse, then find me the tallest horse you can find.

Without knowing ALL the details, then WHY suggest that he be thrown off the team.

Devlyn Cousin has been charged with simple domestic assault. A simple misdemeanor. Let the facts come out. Let the case be resolved. And THEN make judgement.
 
Without knowing ALL the details, then WHY suggest that he be thrown off the team.

Devlyn Cousin has been charged with simple domestic assault. A simple misdemeanor. Let the facts come out. Let the case be resolved. And THEN make judgement.

I never said only kick him off the team. I said or be suspended for a while. I personally don't care if it's just a simple misdemeanor. You put your hands on somebody (especially a woman), you deserve it. Know your limits. Just my opinion. Not saying you have to agree.
 
Yes, I expect Mutcherson and Cousin to be fully back on the team for the upcoming season. Given that, the defense for next year looks to be much improved. As you can see, that 2nd team group is pretty much equivalent to this year's starting crew, so the upgrades seem pretty clear along the Defensive Line in particular...Linebacker is also going to much stronger with Harris and Mills being vastly more athletic than crew of Meeks/Knott/Seeley. No comparison there. The only thing that held Harris back was schematic understanding, which Wally is fixing over the course of his RS year....and Mills getting a taste of the field this season coupled with another off season will allow him to have tremendous development going into 2015. The key to everything, of course, is that Tucker and Leath are as good as advertised...and no doubt it will take them a little time to really adjust to this level of football. Tucker coming in early is huge in this regard.

Garcia as a backup is intriguing as well, because he showed moments of real ability though he was clearly thrown into battle way too soon this year...but another year of growth mixed with that experience could let him become a solid factor next year. Ditto for Cousin. As a backup, he can have the luxury of developing as he plays in smaller doses. Returning the 3 starters in the secondary and adding Wiltz makes for a nice four man group...and Kenneth Lynn was playing very well at the end of the year, so he is no lock to lose his job to Wiltz. That competition is nothing but good. At DE, Meyers always impressed as a Morrissey style of player, and Pierson really started coming on at the end of the season....Taylor had some good moments as well...so I think that's at least 3 very solid DE guys. Not great, but adequate as Big 12 quality players. Don't see any way that Meyers stays at DT, BTW.

There are many question marks, and much depends on the two Jucos in the center of the D-line. But...if they come through...this defense will be not just be better, it will be a lot better. To be clear, that will elevate them to being an average defense, not a good one. But that is still a quantum improvement over this season. Given our offensive tools and Mangino's system gaining strength, an average defense would be a very big deal and I think can carry us to a bowl game.



NG Demond Tucker
DT Bobby Leath
DE Dal Pierson
DE Mitchell Meyer
LB Jordan Harris
LB Brian Mills
NB Reggan Northrup
CB Jomal Wiltz
CB Nigel Tribune
SS Kamari Cotton-Moya
FS TJ Mutcherson


Backups
NG Devlyn Cousin
DT Robbie Garcia/Ayeni
DE Trent Taylor
DE Darius White/Gabe Luna
LB Alton Meeks/Sam Seonbucher
LB Levi Peters/Luke Knott
LB/NB Willie Harvey
CB Kenneth Lynn
CB Sam Richardson
SS Kamari Syrie
FS Qujuan Floyd

Just looking ahead, and trying to staunch the tide of pessimism...there is talent on this defense and I believe we will see fairly dramatic improvement. Overall, this 2015 defense looks to have a lot of speed...as always, the first concern is can it be staunch enough to stop the inside run games it will face. Leath/Tucker are the key to that and to everything else.

I see psych wards have the internets now.
 
Taylor
Tucker
Cousin
Pierson

Floyd
Harris
Meeks

Tribune
Mutcherson
Cotton-moya
Richardson

More experienced. Knows the system better. Less thinking, more reacting. If Harris is the next great Wally LB which I fully expect him to be, our defense is in good shape.
 
I am optimistic that our defense will be better next year, even significantly better. They were just so stinking bad last year that I can't convince myself that even significant improvement is going to lead to anything special.
 
I am optimistic that our defense will be better next year, even significantly better. They were just so stinking bad last year that I can't convince myself that even significant improvement is going to lead to anything special.

I agree, cautious optimism. Just kind of like baseball, if you are tough up the middle on defense (C, P, SS, 2 and CF) you can be pretty good. If your NG, DT, MLB and Safeties are weak then your unit will be. I was really pretty surprised how good the S play was, everything else..? Especially MLB and middle of the line was just Baaaad. Hopefully with good health things will improve. I just hope Harris picked up on the mental part of the game. Dude has the physical talent and attitude, but for some reason, Wally's schemes seem to be complicated to learn, maybe with the exception of Jesse Smith. He never skipped a beat, and actually played better under Wally than Bolt.
 
If our defense is going to make any strides next year it is going to have to be from a mix of new guys making an impact and the young guys who played stepping up their game. After seeing how Miller and George improved in their 4th year in the program I feel it is way to early to give up on guys like Meeks, Seeley and Knott. George was really struggling his first 2 years and ended up getting drafted. I hope Wally rotates the LB's like he did the last few games. His first 5 1/2 years he rarely would put any of the backups in. I think that hurt both development and also led to some guys leaving.
 
Yeah, the defense should be better just by default. I don't know how things will shake out with Mutcherson, but if I had to guess I'd say he's probably not coming back based on CPR's most recent comments. If that's how it goes then that'll put a damper on things, but overall the secondary should be in good hands with Tribune and Cotton Moya returning. It's that front seven that's the big unknown. The oft-referenced "light" has to go on for Harris and Meeks this offseason. In the front four it's folly to count too heavily on the recent juco additions. If they turn out to be world beaters, great. But big improvement and development has to come from the guys who have been in the program 2-3 years. Time for them to step up and start making plays.
 
There is a big difference too between George, being aggressive and being in the wrong gap, vs. what we saw in the LB core this year at the end of the season looking completely lost and out of position (ie. 8 yards down field running away from the ball when the RB is running right up the gut the entire time). Saw it time and time again. As Jack Whitver said, some of these guys are not Division I players, plain and simple. Put the best guy out there at all times in the LB core. Rotate the DL. The Mike is the QB of the defense.
 
There is a big difference too between George, being aggressive and being in the wrong gap, vs. what we saw in the LB core this year at the end of the season looking completely lost and out of position (ie. 8 yards down field running away from the ball when the RB is running right up the gut the entire time). Saw it time and time again. As Jack Whitver said, some of these guys are not Division I players, plain and simple. Put the best guy out there at all times in the LB core. Rotate the DL. The Mike is the QB of the defense.

Agreed. A lot of posters (myself included) really piled on Wally towards the end of this season for his defenses being too vanilla and passive. Now that we're a couple weeks removed from the whole damn mess, it's fair to ask what exactly he should have done differently with the players available to him. If they couldn't execute his base schemes then why would he throw the exotic coverage and blitz packages at them and expect them to pull those off?
If even a couple guys get it together this offseason to the point where they know where they're supposed to be and actually have the ability to get there to make a play then we'll all look silly for suggesting that it's time for Wally to hang it up.
 
Agreed. A lot of posters (myself included) really piled on Wally towards the end of this season for his defenses being too vanilla and passive. Now that we're a couple weeks removed from the whole damn mess, it's fair to ask what exactly he should have done differently with the players available to him. If they couldn't execute his base schemes then why would he throw the exotic coverage and blitz packages at them and expect them to pull those off?
If even a couple guys get it together this offseason to the point where they know where they're supposed to be and actually have the ability to get there to make a play then we'll all look silly for suggesting that it's time for Wally to hang it up.

While I agree, it also sticks in my craw about recruiting. Makes me wonder if our staff who signed these LB's thought the recruits would come to us after the 2011 OK State win? Just seems like they didn't recruit real aggressively at LB for 1-2 years, and offered some schollies up to some flyers, just a WAG. Realignment talk was going on that same time too. But there is a talent gap at LB for sure vs. what we had, AND vs. the rest of the Big 12 in our upperclassmen.
 
While I agree, it also sticks in my craw about recruiting. Makes me wonder if our staff who signed these LB's thought the recruits would come to us after the 2011 OK State win? Just seems like they didn't recruit real aggressively at LB for 1-2 years, and offered some schollies up to some flyers, just a WAG. Realignment talk was going on that same time too. But there is a talent gap at LB for sure vs. what we had, AND vs. the rest of the Big 12 in our upperclassmen.

Sure, there's blame to go around for everyone. The players didn't execute either because they didn't know what they were doing or lacked the ability to do it, and that's not only on them but on the coaching staff for failing to build quality depth through recruiting or coaching the players up so they can execute.
 
I'm just gonna pray for the defense to be average and the offense to really be good. At least then if we lose it can be shoot outs that are fun to watch...
 
We didn't take many LB's in 2011 and 2012. Bigger areas of need and we had Knott, Klein, and Jeremiah George. We basically only have 2 LB's from those 2 classes. Jevohn Miller (who did not use a redshirt) and Kane Seeley. Darius White was recruited as a LB and is now at DE. And then we had Adam Pavlenko and Donald Smith who left the program almost right away. We used a lot of our scholarships on the offensive side of the ball. Especially on WR's.
 
We didn't take many LB's in 2011 and 2012. Bigger areas of need and we had Knott, Klein, and Jeremiah George. We basically only have 2 LB's from those 2 classes. Jevohn Miller (who did not use a redshirt) and Kane Seeley. Darius White was recruited as a LB and is now at DE. And then we had Adam Pavlenko and Donald Smith who left the program almost right away. We used a lot of our scholarships on the offensive side of the ball. Especially on WR's.

True, but that's my point. We swung and whiffed and seem to be overloaded with other position groups. Seems like little to no attempt was made to replace Pavlenko and Smith with Juco LB's and have some guys in the system (even if RS jucos) to replace AJ and Jake after they graduated?
 
True, but that's my point. We swung and whiffed and seem to be overloaded with other position groups. Seems like little to no attempt was made to replace Pavlenko and Smith with Juco LB's and have some guys in the system (even if RS jucos) to replace AJ and Jake after they graduated?

I think they expected Miller to pick things up quicker than he did. They also expected C.J. Morgan to stay around. Even then there would have been little to know depth, considering linebackers like Knott and Brackens were both recruited as safeties. I think there is some truth to the idea that this staff focused on offense in recruiting. Linebackers were probably the area least focused on, which kind of makes sense since we really only need two.
 
True, but that's my point. We swung and whiffed and seem to be overloaded with other position groups. Seems like little to no attempt was made to replace Pavlenko and Smith with Juco LB's and have some guys in the system (even if RS jucos) to replace AJ and Jake after they graduated?

We have taken some steps in addressing LB needs but those guys are all pretty young yet. Not sure how many Juco LB's were out there that were interested in us and us in them. IMO, we have taken way too many WR's in the past. In 2011 and 2012 we took 4 WR's in each class. Aaron Horne was a Juco WR. Last year's class had 2 WR's and this year's class has 1 WR.

It seems that we go in waves of overkill on some position groups some years and very few in others, rather than a consistent approach of only taking a certain number of each position each year. I suppose part of that is the "best player available" theory, where we may have a need for a certain position but the players we can get at those positions are not rated highly. No doubt that some recruiting misses and injuries have hurt us.
 
We have taken some steps in addressing LB needs but those guys are all pretty young yet. Not sure how many Juco LB's were out there that were interested in us and us in them. IMO, we have taken way too many WR's in the past. In 2011 and 2012 we took 4 WR's in each class. Aaron Horne was a Juco WR. Last year's class had 2 WR's and this year's class has 1 WR.

It seems that we go in waves of overkill on some position groups some years and very few in others, rather than a consistent approach of only taking a certain number of each position each year. I suppose part of that is the "best player available" theory, where we may have a need for a certain position but the players we can get at those positions are not rated highly. No doubt that some recruiting misses and injuries have hurt us.

Don't forget the attrition due to various player transfers and dismissals - the prominent ones that immediately come to mind are Charlie Rogers, Coe and Irving. For a program with as little margin for error as ISU has, you just can't survive that kind of turnover.
 
If wiltz is starting I would be surprised, and it would be a good surprise.

IMO Wiltz will likely win the job as our returner. He is good. Probably will provide depth in the secondary as a backup, but will certainly play.

If Wiltz does happen to start then that means he is an upgrade which would be a good thing, like you said.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron