Basketball recruiting update
- Thread starter cyismydog
- Start date
I can't imagine it would, but I've seen enough people advocating it before to clear up recruiting issues. :cute:
cyismydog, I've asked this before (maybe even in this thread, I can't remember), but why wouldn't we want Ejim over Kelm? I keep hearing Ejim is our backup plan and Kelm is still considering his options. Since we don't have any true 3s in the system right now, why wouldn't we try for two good ones (including Barnes)? I'd hate to blow our chance with Ejim because we're waiting around for Barnes...
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
I can agree with both of these posts. I don't think our coach would do it, but it would be sleazy.
We are not waiting on Ejim. We have offered him a scholly and are going after him
cyismydog:
Your speculation is totally inaccurate.
I watched RV play again last night. Dykstra has not and does not play the 1 or 2. He plays the 3-5 spots in the RV offense.
I have stated it before, and I only have my opinion to express, but Dykstra needs to add 40 lbs and double his strength to begin to see minutes at the 4 in Big 12 BB. This would appear to be an automatic redshirt. Also, 6'9" is a stretch.
I suggest that readers may be able to watch the RV team play in the state tournament, and then more posters can see for themselves, and end some of the speculation.
Your speculation is totally inaccurate.
I watched RV play again last night. Dykstra has not and does not play the 1 or 2. He plays the 3-5 spots in the RV offense.
I have stated it before, and I only have my opinion to express, but Dykstra needs to add 40 lbs and double his strength to begin to see minutes at the 4 in Big 12 BB. This would appear to be an automatic redshirt. Also, 6'9" is a stretch.
I suggest that readers may be able to watch the RV team play in the state tournament, and then more posters can see for themselves, and end some of the speculation.
Well at least 1 person will transfer after this season. You can set that in stone. My guess would be a guy that doesn't play much and Buckley and Mann are at the top of that list. Hopefully they won't, but with ISU's history, it probably will.
Why do you say that? Other than history, of course. It's logical but not set in stone. Would you bet your life on it?
You know I actually would bet my life on it. Tell me that last year that ISU didn't have a player leave or a recruit not make it on the team.
As I said before. I read it in an article, but I may have read it wrong, so I wouldn't call it total speculation.
Also, we now will take both Ejim and Barnes. I guess we got tired of waiting for Kelm.
FYI, it's just the impression I got, was never said that we wanted Ejim and Barnes over Kelm and Ejim/Barnes.
Nope.....Kelm's was unconditional for a really long time. And that's a fact. He just never pulled the trigger and committed.
How do you surprise a coach? Doesn't he need help getting into any building...let alone a game?
through an assistant coach? IF this is true (which I'm not sure it is) it could be very bad, sounds like a commitment would coming along with it...
