Do bowl games matter anymore?

uh... yeah

Cats-pull-milk-bowl.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Acylum and madguy30
Yes they were. There was a time when the bowl games factored heavily into who was declared the national champion. That's no longer the case.
There were maybe 3 bowl games in a given season that determined the national champion.

The only reason the bowls matter less is because there was a collective decision that they just mattered less. Their actual affect on final standings or a school's success (or lack thereof) is the same as it always was.

Bowls have always been glorified exhibitions. It's just that sometime in the last 20 years, that became a popular reason to look down on them or ignore them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneErik
Does the Pro Bowl matter? It's about the same level as some of these games. But I wouldn't get rid of them. They are a way to reward the athletes for their hard work and success throughout the season. And it typically gives the fans a nice excuse to travel over the winter holidays. It's a win all around, but they still don't matter.
 
There were maybe 3 bowl games in a given season that determined the national champion.

The only reason the bowls matter less is because there was a collective decision that they just mattered less. Their actual affect on final standings or a school's success (or lack thereof) is the same as it always was.

Bowls have always been glorified exhibitions. It's just that sometime in the last 20 years, that became a popular reason to look down on them or ignore them.

Getting to a point where you really don't have to be good to even make one really hurt and just watered it down further.

Otherwise like others have said it's more football.
 
Does the Pro Bowl matter? It's about the same level as some of these games. But I wouldn't get rid of them. They are a way to reward the athletes for their hard work and success throughout the season. And it typically gives the fans a nice excuse to travel over the winter holidays. It's a win all around, but they still don't matter.

Well, the "Pro Bowl" is now just flag football and a skills competition.
 
It's not really about the schools making money. Well, the schools think so, but it's much more about TV, advertisers, and businesses involved in tourism making the money. The schools and teams just a means to an end.
Agree, but schools going to top end bowls make good money, right?
 
Due to the transfer portal and opt outs the teams trotted out onto the field for bowl games are not the teams that earned that bowl game. For example look at Iowa. Due to transfers and 1 injury they will be sending out a QB that is either a rs freshman or a true freshman, neither of which have taken a single snap in a live college football game, will be with out key contributors at rb and wr in Gavin Williams, Arland Bruce, and Keagan Johnson. This doesn't even talk about opt outs.

I understand some of the opt outs being worried about injuries but at what point do we start to worry about that? Should they also opt out of conference championship games since they don't really mean anything? How about the last game of the regular season? Is it because there are so many bowls now, the kids just don't care, or something I just don't get? Does an expanded CFP give them more reason to finish the season out?
It's a clear indicator that many bowls mean far less to players than they do the fans. And that shouldn't really come as a surprise. Players who are heading to the draft are weighing the injury risk and players who are want to transfer want to just move on. A trip to Nashville or San Antonio isn't necessarily much of an incentive.

And with the playoff expanding, they'll mean even less going forward. It's just reality.
 
They 100% matter for development. Those extra practices are pretty damn valuable.
 
Getting to a point where you really don't have to be good to even make one really hurt and just watered it down further.

Otherwise like others have said it's more football.
I can't remember a time when 6 wins weren't eligible. The criteria for inclusion hasn't really changed much in probably 30 years.
 
I can't remember a time when 6 wins weren't eligible. The criteria for inclusion hasn't really changed much in probably 30 years.

6 wins meant you were eligible but certainly didn't mean you would get selected for a bowl until the late 90's or early 2000's when the number of bowls dramatically increased. Up until then there were 6,7,8 win teams that got left out.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyclones500
As said...they matter...but they matter for reasons other than the obvious reason which was the competition/game that was played that day on the field. Extra practice for teams who play in bowl games matters to coaches and tourism money matters to the host city. The game itself? Not as much as they used to matter.
 
6 wins meant you were eligible but certainly didn't mean you would get selected for a bowl until the late 90's or early 2000's when the number of bowls dramatically increased. Up until then there were 6,7,8 win teams that got left out.
I'm 37, and the first football season I can really remember is 1995 (TD's first good year). 6 win teams went to bowls all the time, and people were talking then about how there were too many bowl games.

I don't think opt outs started until sometime around 2013 or 2014. You had a 20 year window where we had a pile of bowl games, but players still treated them as significant. There was no substantive change to the bowl season or format, there was just a collective mindset shift that this didn't mean much.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron