Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can see the parallel, but unlike Last Jedi, Loki has been hinting that the TVA is not above board the entire series.did anyone else get Last Jedi vibes from the team up battle at the end? Loki and Sylvie start fighting together, mysterious big baddie gets unceremoniously killed off and they discover that it’s actually all a ruse for something more sinister…
Maybe I’m looking too much into it.
did anyone else get Last Jedi vibes from the team up battle at the end? Loki and Sylvie start fighting together, mysterious big baddie gets unceremoniously killed off and they discover that it’s actually all a ruse for something more sinister…
Maybe I’m looking too much into it.
It's no secret I've been pretty down on here about the Loki series, ESPECIALLY after episode 3. I thought that episode was terrible, boring and pointless. With that said, I'll admit episode 4 finally took a step back in the right direction for me. So, am I sold on this series now? No. However, at least it's got me back into being intrigued to see what is next. There is still only two episodes left and seemingly still a lot of story to finish out in a satisfactory manner, so we'll see I guess. I'm still skeptical but I try not to fully judge something until the end.
I think you're looking into it way too much. We didn't know the end of TLJ was a ruse until the next one came out, and it probably wasn't Rian's thought that it was a ruse. This one told us right away.
Yes, plot wise it’s not identical but watch this scene and tell me you didn’t just watch this same sequence in the most recent episode:
They'll probably leave us on the hook and impatiently waiting for season 2, so I'm not expecting too much to get wrapped up.
I was hoping for a big reveal this week based on a theory I've seen quite a few places
The theory was that Kang the Conqueror was one of the Timekeepers. And I thought it had merit because one of them looked just like him. With the reveal this week it's less likely, but he could be the one pulling the strings still. He's a time/dimension traveler so this is right up his alley.
To your spoiler - We gotta stop doing this to ourselves. At first it was Mephisto or the Mutants in WandaVision. Then it was the Mutants in Falcon. Now we're doing this Kang stuff. These Marvel shows are like limited series comic events. You don't unleash your big bads in those limited series'. If there was a Human Torch TV show they aren't going to introduce Galactus in it. He'll be in the Fantastic 4 movie.
That said, I agree there are a lot more easter eggs right now for him than what was in the other shows and they've already cast the actor who will play him but I've got to see it before I believe it at this point.
To your spoiler - We gotta stop doing this to ourselves. At first it was Mephisto or the Mutants in WandaVision. Then it was the Mutants in Falcon. Now we're doing this Kang stuff. These Marvel shows are like limited series comic events. You don't unleash your big bads in those limited series'. If there was a Human Torch TV show they aren't going to introduce Galactus in it. He'll be in the Fantastic 4 movie.
That said, I agree there are a lot more easter eggs right now for him than what was in the other shows and they've already cast the actor who will play him but I've got to see it before I believe it at this point.
Vanity Fair: What’s next for you? Is there a season five in the works for Fargo?
Noah Hawley: Yeah, I think so. I don’t have it yet. I have pieces that will have to survive. They’re not connected. I think it would be good to create an ending, and deliberately come to something, knowing it’s the last one and see how one might wrap up this anthology. What’s next for me, it looks like, is [an] Alien series for FX, taking on that franchise and those amazing films by Ridley Scott and James Cameron and David Fincher. Those are great monster movies, but they’re not just monster movies. They’re about humanity trapped between our primordial, parasitic past and our artificial intelligence future—and they’re both trying to kill us. Here you have human beings and they can’t go forward and they can’t go back. So I find that really interesting.
Vanity Fair: Where are you in that process?
Noah Hawley: I’ve written a couple of scripts, the first two scripts, and we’re looking to make them next spring. When you get to something with this level of visual effects, there’s a lot of preparation that has to go into it. What’s been really illuminating is to see that the entire film industry had to take a year off and they are now trying to jam two years of production into one year. So it’s very hard to look on the planet earth and see where you might make something in the next six months. Everyone is racing to make up for lost time. So, I figure let that bubble burst a little bit and we’ll do it right.
Vanity Fair: Is there anything else you can share about it? Is it part of the Ripley story, or will it be original characters in a different time and place?
Noah Hawley: It’s not a Ripley story. She’s one of the great characters of all time, and I think the story has been told pretty perfectly, and I don’t want to mess with it. It’s a story that’s set on Earth also. The alien stories are always trapped… Trapped in a prison, trapped in a space ship. I thought it would be interesting to open it up a little bit so that the stakes of “What happens if you can’t contain it?” are more immediate.
Vanity Fair: Deadly things that can’t be contained and the whole world at risk? Sounds relevant to the past year.
Noah Hawley: On some level it’s also a story about inequality. You know, one of the things that I love about the first movie is how ’70s a movie it is, and how it’s really this blue collar space-trucker world in which Yaphet Kotto and Harry Dean Stanton are basically Waiting for Godot. They’re like Samuel Beckett characters, ordered to go to a place by a faceless nameless corporation. The second movie is such an ’80s movie, but it’s still about grunts. Paul Reiser is middle management at best. So, it is the story of the people you send to do the dirty work.
Vanity Fair: How does that relate to your series?
Noah Hawley: In mine, you’re also going to see the people who are sending them. So you will see what happens when the inequality we’re struggling with now isn’t resolved. If we as a society can’t figure out how to prop each other up and spread the wealth, then what’s going to happen to us? There’s that great Sigourney Weaver line to Paul Reiser where she says, “I don’t know which species is worse. At least they don’t **** each other over for a percentage.”
Not MCU-related, but thought this was the best place to post:
Noah Hawley, creator behind FX shows like Legion and Fargo, is working on a new series for FX, this time based on the Alien cinematic universe:
![]()
New ‘Alien’ TV Series Will Be Class Warfare With Xenomorphs
Showrunner Noah Hawley explains what you need to know about his upcoming FX show and his latest novel, ‘Anthem.’www.vanityfair.com
Alien is now a Disney property, due to the acquisition of 20th/21st Century Fox.
Who are the people in the end credit scene?!?!? I’m pretty sure that’s Stark Tower behind the old guy. What the ****?!?!?!??
Right. But wtf? How does this tie into in to the spiderverse? There’s a lot of parallels there with those other Spider-Man and those Loki’s like the lizard Loki and the Pig Spider-ManOther lokis.