You are absolutely correct, but it still sounds like "Get off my yard you little ****!!!"
***Official Texas postgame thread***
- Thread starter Cyclonepride
- Start date
The inconsistency really is a question, though. ANY team can have a bad game or even a few. But to be so consistently inconsistent all season long makes you wonder what the hell is going on.
Didn’t defend the three... looked okay for ten minutes and then it got ugly.... regroup and hope not to lose in the first round of the tourney...
At the very worst it's Morgan. I'm not sure how any one with a brain can think this is equal to McDermott era. Jesus. This is the reason that I bash people on here for not being fans.
Yeah, absolutely. I feel like at this point it's one of those things that the coaching staff and team have to work through by just going forward and getting it out of their heads, so to speak. Just focus on the little details to start with, and build towards consistency from there.
Do they get it with a 17-15 record? Think that would be a first if they do. They really have work to do.
Agreed but I think a whole lot of our inconsistency is that we still don't have a leader. No one steps up is vocal. We don't have a Niang, Naz, Kane, Morris, Ejim, etc. Babb just isn't that personality. Shayok either. I don't think LW WANTS to be and LH and THT are too green.
Iowa easily. They take the cake with a home blowout loss to Rutgers.
The PAC being absolute dog **** this year is going to get a lot of these type of teams in, IMO.
I just saw the Rutgers - EIU score.
Am I a bad person if that makes me feel a little better?
Am I a bad person if that makes me feel a little better?
They have been and will be in the mix.
Our fans tend to have an overinflated view of what it actually takes to make the NCAA.
They’re almost always dog ****. They’ve been a 1 bid league in the past. There could be still some mid majors that don’t win their conference tourney and are good enough for an at large.
#25 KenPom
#36 NET before today
Minimum 8-10 league mark
Wins: North Carolina, Kansas, Kansas State, Purdue, Iowa State
They are in. Pretty comfortably actually, i.e. not 'last four in'.
I think you are right. Hopefully with a little more time and experience someone will step up. Or maybe one of next year's new guys is a natural leader.
My fear, though, is the possibility that leadership at the top is making it difficult for leadership to emerge at the player level. I'm not making an accusation, but that can happen.
I just stopped by to throw up.
Love these guys and and still believe in them. WVU is going to be a tough place to get well, not because of their talent but that ******* style.
See ya all in a few days, hitting the 'Open in case of emergencies' beer cooler....
Love these guys and and still believe in them. WVU is going to be a tough place to get well, not because of their talent but that ******* style.
See ya all in a few days, hitting the 'Open in case of emergencies' beer cooler....
What's the definition of insanity?
I can't remember a single game this year playing meaningful minutes that we had two posts in the game at the same time. Why not give it a shot?
Why not start Wigginton? Haliburton could be a nice spark off the bench.
I'm not saying i have the answers, but why not mix it up a little bit and try something different?
I can't remember a single game this year playing meaningful minutes that we had two posts in the game at the same time. Why not give it a shot?
Why not start Wigginton? Haliburton could be a nice spark off the bench.
I'm not saying i have the answers, but why not mix it up a little bit and try something different?
