Fall Camp Depth Chart

Uwazurike and Leo are both 290???

That seems massive for a couple D-ends (yes I know that Campbell said they both will be seeing time inside but I still expect to seem them outside quite often, especially Uwazurike). I get not wanting to get blown off the line of scrimmage, but at that weight you'd think it'd be tough to get to the quarterback other than performing a bull rush.
That's true but having guys that are 6'6"-6'7" and if they can get their hands up it could really cut down on the throwing lanes. It's not always about sacks. Sometimes just making the quarterback uncomfortable in the pocket can pay dividends.
 
Glad to see Carson Lending's name come up. I remember enjoying his highlights during recruitment and wondered why he didn't have more hype. Went back and found it. It's laughably impressive. Clearly a men among boys type of situation in highschool. He played about every position for his team. Makes sense that he was recruited as an ATH. Could be a very nice 4 year contributor for us on the DL.

His senior highlights for those interested...



Looks good against the Lil' Hokeyes in that video!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CYCLNST8
That's true but having guys that are 6'6"-6'7" and if they can get their hands up it could really cut down on the throwing lanes. It's not always about sacks. Sometimes just making the quarterback uncomfortable in the pocket can pay dividends.

It's also like having an extra DT on the field to help hold the line of scrimmage. Look around the league; you'll see lots of schools playing a short stout nose guard @ about 6'2" 310lb, an athletic rangy DT @ about 6'5" 290lb, a pass rushing DE @ about 6'4" 247, & a strong DE @ about 6'6" 275.

I think that's the ideal setup for a four man front and what this staff is aiming for. For too many seasons we've watched our D line get blown off the line of scrimmage against the run. Our best line so far this century was McCarney's 05 squad: Berryman, Moorehead, Curvey, & Leaders. Though a bit undersized, they played with great leverage and were tenacious. More importantly you need a killer instinct no matter how big you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyence
Listening to you guys get excited about the season before this team and staff have actually proven anything shows why they are still sending Nigerian Prince email scams.

While you are NOT wrong, keep in mind that now is the best time to be optimistic unless and until the team starts winning the first, second, third games, etc. And of course we are not the only ones that do this. Living here in Omaha, you should hear the talk about Big Red. They might go 12-0 this year. Their unknown transfer QB from powerhouse Tulane is a sure-fire NFL quarterback once he is done at Nebraska. Their defense is going to stop everyone from going anywhere. Winning the BIG West is well within their grasp. But I don't blame them a bit, we should all be excited for our teams before the season starts. What should we be doing instead, talking about how ISU is going to win 2 games this year? No thank you!

Somebody said that it couldn't be done
But he with a chuckle replied
"I wouldn't be one to say it is so
Until I can give it a try!"
So he buckled right in
With a trace of a grin
If he had a worry, he hid it.
And he started to sing
As he tackled that thing
That couldn't be done. And he did it.

I would give credit if I knew who originally wrote this. I just know it from memory. Go State!
 
Since forever we've had a DLine that usually has 1 pretty decent player and rest just meh or worse and the interior 2 spots barely had a kid at 290 with the depth on the interior being 280 ish..and let's be honest not all that talented depth along with DEs at times on the field at 230-240..

Lima- 300
Trent- 290+
Jahmal- 315
Tongo(we will see)- 315+
Leo- 290
Eyioma- 290
Benton- 250 ish
JD- 250 ish
Bailey- 260

Size doesn't guarantee effectiveness but it sure doesn't hurt. Maybe this year in 4th qtr we will sub in a 290+ lb kid who is fresh instead of a 270 lb kid.

I'm kinda excited to see our secondary..I think we will have some athletes back there and am intrigued to see Wilkerson the Georgia transfer
 
Uwazurike and Leo are both 290???

That seems massive for a couple D-ends (yes I know that Campbell said they both will be seeing time inside but I still expect to seem them outside quite often, especially Uwazurike). I get not wanting to get blown off the line of scrimmage, but at that weight you'd think it'd be tough to get to the quarterback other than performing a bull rush.

Have you seen they way those two are built? They're not exactly bloated walruses. Now we just need to stick the two of them in a cage and beat them with a stick until they hate the world. ;)
 
  • Funny
Reactions: bozclone
Why was everyone surprised by spears being listed as a starter? He was rated as a 3 star 84.11 on 247 with 2 other power 5 offers. I was actually surprised we didn't hear his name more last year. He is only a red shirt soph so it isn't like he is waiting really late to start pushing for playing time
 
Why was everyone surprised by spears being listed as a starter? He was rated as a 3 star 84.11 on 247 with 2 other power 5 offers. I was actually surprised we didn't hear his name more last year. He is only a red shirt soph so it isn't like he is waiting really late to start pushing for playing time

Mostly because he's listed ahead of Reggan Northrup who played a lot more than Spears last year. I feel some of this might be the staff's way of motivating Northrup more than anything.

CMC said he was proud of the work put in by Spears this entire offseason, and he's earned the #1 spot on the pre-camp depth chart. That doesn't mean he'll be the game one starter, but he's being rewarded for his efforts this offseason.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: CyValley
Mostly because he's listed ahead of Reggan Northrup who played a lot more than Spears last year. I feel some of this might be the staff's way of motivating Northrup more than anything.

CMC said he was proud of the work put in by Spears this entire offseason, and he's earned the #1 spot on the pre-camp depth chart. That doesn't mean he'll be the game one starter, but he's being rewarded for his efforts this offseason.
For sure I know none of these guys are locked into the starting positions but like I said he should at least get some playing time.
 
All speculation aside, I'm not sure we have ever had this many big bodies ready to play on the D-line. Now maybe they all aren't ready like Leo, but I imagine he can hold his own on the inside. Rugby is a brutal sport.
 
It's also like having an extra DT on the field to help hold the line of scrimmage. Look around the league; you'll see lots of schools playing a short stout nose guard @ about 6'2" 310lb, an athletic rangy DT @ about 6'5" 290lb, a pass rushing DE @ about 6'4" 247, & a strong DE @ about 6'6" 275.

I think that's the ideal setup for a four man front and what this staff is aiming for. For too many seasons we've watched our D line get blown off the line of scrimmage against the run. Our best line so far this century was McCarney's 05 squad: Berryman, Moorehead, Curvey, & Leaders. Though a bit undersized, they played with great leverage and were tenacious. More importantly you need a killer instinct no matter how big you are.
I agree that was a good group, but I think Hayward, Reed, Harklau and DeRonde was better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CYCLNST8
I agree that was a good group, but I think Hayward, Reed, Harklau and DeRonde was better.

I'll disagree with that. Hayward was a stud. Berryman was just as productive though. Reed and Curvey were similar players. Moorehead has ISU records for sacks. He was better than DeRonde, although DeRonde was good. Leaders was clearly better than Harklau though. IMO, 2005 was a better run stuffing DL with better starters. What the 2000 group had was better depth with Tharpe and a young Jordan Carstens. If the 2005 group had two guys like that as backups, that team would have went 11-1 IMO.
 
This is the most impressive depth chart we have had in years.

Question for the QB spot. If Park gets hurt, will we really put Kyle Kempt in the backfield or will Lanning come back over to the offense?

I am thinking Lanning has made a permanent move for the most part. I am thinking Noland along with Kempt as backup.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: clonedude
I really like our size and our numbers on the DL. We finally have competition across the line. Competition will make these guys better as a whole. In the past, we had to play a guy like Jhaustin Thomas before he was really ready because the guy behind him was an undersized freshman or a walk-on. Now we have depth we haven't had before. Someone like Leo can play this year, but the staff can control in what situations. This should help prevent mistakes and help the defense as a whole.
 
The d line in 2017 will be interesting but in 2018 it should be really good. The starters for sure. We might even have some depth. Lima tongamoa and Leo will all be in their second year. Johnson, Bailey and Uwazurike will be in year 3 in the program. We will still have benton as well that by that time will very experienced.

I'm not sure if any will be elite pass rushers, but their size alone should make it harder for teams to push us around...and it has been a long time since that has happened. I wouldn't be surprised if 3-4 are on NFL rosters at some point
 
I really like our size and our numbers on the DL. . . . Now we have depth we haven't had before.

For me, the meaning of the word "depth" is proven quality players. We've got promising players, seems like, but we don't have depth . . . yet. jmho.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: clonedude
This is my favorite time of year. So much to be excited about for the football program. I know last year it didn't translate in the W/L column, but anyone that couldn't see the difference between Sept and November is smoking something. I'd be surprised if CMC doesn't lead a team to 6 or 7 wins this year or next.
 
This is my favorite time of year. So much to be excited about for the football program. I know last year it didn't translate in the W/L column, but anyone that couldn't see the difference between Sept and November is smoking something. I'd be surprised if CMC doesn't lead a team to 6 or 7 wins this year or next.

I agree with your entire post. But like Phil Steele said what he doesn't like is ISU's schedule. It's gonna be pretty tough to get the road wins I think we'll need to get to six wins. If Campbell can get to six wins with this schedule he will have really shown us something. I think he can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyence and cyfan21
I agree with your entire post. But like Phil Steele said what he doesn't like is ISU's schedule. It's gonna be pretty tough to get the road wins I think we'll need to get to six wins. If Campbell can get to six wins with this schedule he will have really shown us something. I think he can.
How many close games have we lost over the last couple years? Or forever, haha, but I digress!

Anyway, yes the schedule is hard, always is. But if I were a betting man and the O/U was 5 I'd bet the over this year. I really think that'd be a win or a push at worst.