I wouldn't have done that trade. I would have however done the trade they did. I feel they are going to trade their two first round later picks, not the number two, and Clarkson for PG. The reason I wouldn't trade a lot for PG is because we are going to get him anyway. Mozgov 54 mil off books, Lakers seem to think Russell is immature. It does suck because I really like Clarkson . I think they will stick deng contract on the PG trade hopefully
Yeah, I think for now the best offer the Pacers will get from LA is Clarkson and the 27th and 28th picks tomorrow night. They're not going to pry away that #2 pick unless another team paracutes in between now and tomorrow night with a big offer. And that's the right play for the Lakers. No reason to give up anything more than spare parts and late first rounders if there aren't any other serious bidders at the moment.
And if that's it, then I think Pritchard is going to wait until the Cavs get their new GM in place in the hopes that they'll be able to revive talks and get a third team involved to reroute Kevin Love. He doesn't have the leverage to do anything else.
You can't understate just how badly PG screwed Indy by telling them that he won't re-sign and then leaking the news. It absolutely destroyed his trade value. I get that it's partly on them for not putting a better supporting cast around him. But his camp knew exactly what they were doing by making it known that not only was PG not going to re-sign in Indy, but that he was only interested in going to LA. So **** that guy. I hope the Lakers suck for another decade.