I'll be in Naples Italy this summer, leaving June 4
S'pose a good place for a man with a strong collection of boat shoes......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll be in Naples Italy this summer, leaving June 4
C'mon Boxster give us nephew updates, I'm sure you did something fun with them today.
I'll be in Naples Italy this summer, leaving June 4
I would think Venice would be a better place for someone with a strong collection of boat shoes.S'pose a good place for a man with a strong collection of boat shoes......
Couple of issues I had with today's wedding/reception:
1. Wedding was at 1:00 in the afternoon and lasted until 2:30pm. Took 30 minutes to drive there and 30 minutes to come back home. Then, the reception was not until 6:00 (took an hour to drive there), but the bride and groom don't show up until 7:30pm. Stayed until 9:45 and took another hour to drive back home. Is it inconsiderate to plan your reception that much later than the wedding ceremony? Felt like our whole day was spent on "their" special day.
2. Should a second marriage ceremony ever be this elaborate? Multiple bridesmaids/groomsmen, huge/fancy reception party with multiple performers, full gift registry (china, kitchenware, etc), 3 wedding coordinators, etc. Keep in mind these people are divorced, are in their 40s, and already have their own houses, etc.
Am I wrong here?
My Friends and I are playing the Par Drunk Challenge on monday. Here are the rules we created. Thought it was pretty creative. Hole 9 will be interesting.
- 2 man Best Ball
- 9 Beers per partner, 9 Holes
- One beer much be finished be each partner by the start of the next hole.
- That leaves 6 beers per twosome left.
- If a twosome hits both of their balls OB or 3 Putt each partner drinks a beer each
- If a twosome gets on fire, aka hitting 3 FIR; 3 GIR; or 3 1 putts in a row, they can hand one beer for the other team to drink.
Some couples adhere to the groom not seeing the bride before the wedding. So they take pictures afterward. However, 3.5 hours between wedding & reception is flat out rude, IMO.Couple of issues I had with today's wedding/reception:
1. Wedding was at 1:00 in the afternoon and lasted until 2:30pm. Took 30 minutes to drive there and 30 minutes to come back home. Then, the reception was not until 6:00 (took an hour to drive there), but the bride and groom don't show up until 7:30pm. Stayed until 9:45 and took another hour to drive back home. Is it inconsiderate to plan your reception that much later than the wedding ceremony? Felt like our whole day was spent on "their" special day.
2. Should a second marriage ceremony ever be this elaborate? Multiple bridesmaids/groomsmen, huge/fancy reception party with multiple performers, full gift registry (china, kitchenware, etc), 3 wedding coordinators, etc. Keep in mind these people are divorced, are in their 40s, and already have their own houses, etc.
Am I wrong here?
Couple of issues I had with today's wedding/reception:
1. Wedding was at 1:00 in the afternoon and lasted until 2:30pm. Took 30 minutes to drive there and 30 minutes to come back home. Then, the reception was not until 6:00 (took an hour to drive there), but the bride and groom don't show up until 7:30pm. Stayed until 9:45 and took another hour to drive back home. Is it inconsiderate to plan your reception that much later than the wedding ceremony? Felt like our whole day was spent on "their" special day.
2. Should a second marriage ceremony ever be this elaborate? Multiple bridesmaids/groomsmen, huge/fancy reception party with multiple performers, full gift registry (china, kitchenware, etc), 3 wedding coordinators, etc. Keep in mind these people are divorced, are in their 40s, and already have their own houses, etc.
Am I wrong here?
That's how I feel as well. It was just not a good day today.I would say it's rude to leave several hours in between. I could understand having a cocktail hour while pictures were being taken but more than that seems excessive. Especially for a second marriage. I'd be more understanding of the big wedding if it was a first wedding for either party (or the bride really...because do grooms care?)
Probably some truth to this as well.You're not wrong Walter, you're just an *******.
Probably some truth to this as well.
See, I can understand if your first wedding was not a huge wedding. However, the bride previously had a huge first wedding (as is customary in Indian culture) and this one was insane. Don't get me wrong, it was beautiful and very well done, but seemed a bit much.Some couples adhere to the groom not seeing the bride before the wedding. So they take pictures afterward. However, 3.5 hours between wedding & reception is flat out rude, IMO.
I was intending a very simple wedding with PapaLew (both of us were divorced). That got shot all to hell when he figured out I had eloped the first time, and had never worn a wedding gown. It sort of exploded from there.
We had multiple attendants (our six kids plus my friend who "introduced" us). We did NOT do a registry, in fact we specifically requested NO gifts as we already were combining two full households & 3 of the six kids into one house and we had enough STUFF already. Nearly full church and big reception with a DJ. Yeah, it was kind of overblown for it not being our first marriages...but in retrospect I'm glad he pushed for the formal wedding. It was the experience of a lifetime for me.![]()
Probably not. You are just right on this one. I just like quoting the dude.
Looked for a .gif for this, think I'll get banned if I post any of them.Cannot confirm nor deny that CG may or may not have drunk ridden a mechanical bull tonight.
Looked for a .gif for this, think I'll get banned if I post any of them.