Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The NCAA will drop their "you have to have 12 teams to have a CCG" rule before the Big 12 expands.
The Clemson and FSU ADs both expressed frustration with the widening revenue gap between ACC and other conferences, namely the SEC who recruits the same turf as the ACC. In particular, the ex-Clemson AD was very vocal about them exploring their options, including the B12. However, the Clemson and FSU presidents were against any moves and the ACC ended up getting ND as a partial member and signing a GOR which nixes any ACC school leaving anytime soon. Deloss' pining for ND didn't kill B12 expansion, quit reading the BS from the WVU "sources".
I am not reading from WVU sources. Look back at the quotes you referenced from the administration of the schools you mentioned, and then look at quotes from Deloss at the same time. There were several media outlets reporting on this, not just the WVU crazies.
The reason I don't buy into this "B12 Will Not Expand" idea is that they just reworked the logo to the new improved (very ugly) new Big XII logo. Why stay with Big XII if there's no plan to return to 12 (or more)?
The reason I don't buy into this "B12 Will Not Expand" idea is that they just reworked the logo to the new improved (very ugly) new Big XII logo. Why stay with Big XII if there's no plan to return to 12 (or more)?
Flexibility. Plus ours was the first conference to reach that number. The Big 12 was the original "super conference." The B1G isn't letting go of the name "Big Ten;" would we really want to call ourselves that anyway?
Why stay with Big XII if there's no plan to return to 12 (or more)?
SEC had 12 before the Big 12 did.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_Conference#1990_expansion
http://www.theeagle.com/news/local/...cle_0205a02b-8c30-5815-a5ef-0d631d8ac3ce.html
Might be an interesting read...Aggie slanted I'm sure.
I can't wait for the stories of how ATM got bullied by Texas and how they make out ATM, Nebraska, and Missouri to look like heroes.
Clay TravisVerified account @ClayTravisBGID By its third year, SEC Network will do more revenue by itself than the entire Big 12 TV deal
http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...rage/sec-network-revenue-is-impressive-073014
Interesting read, not sure what it all means for the future, but he misses the fact that this is all cyclical
Clay TravisVerified account @ClayTravisBGID By its third year, SEC Network will do more revenue by itself than the entire Big 12 TV deal
http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...rage/sec-network-revenue-is-impressive-073014
Interesting read, not sure what it all means for the future, but he misses the fact that this is all cyclical
So $650M per year, minus $100M in costs, and ESPN gets half. So the member schools get $275M/14 or about $20M each. And how much are the Big12 schools getting? Oh right.
I guess the question is long term how much bigger the revenue will get for the SEC network. Can they get a bigger cut from ESPN, can they raise prices, can they broaden distribution. So there is upside.
But for the Big12 (or other conferences with more traditional model), there is an upside too. Same demand from CBS, NBC, ESPN et al for games, but less supply. Would drive up the price of media contracts I'd think. SO I see upside here too maybe.
Am I missing something? I don't see how this is a huge game changer for the schools or programs, but maybe for the balance of power with ESPN and distribution.
I can't wait for the stories of how ATM got bullied by Texas and how they make out ATM, Nebraska, and Missouri to look like heroes.