*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just doubt Delany gives much to his ADs as well. Delany with play this thing very close.

Yeah, probably right. It's a compelling argument, though, with regard to super-conference expansion: if it happens somewhere, Pac-16/SEC/B1G are all going to amp up and be ready. If so, we could fill out spot #16 in B1G because of our regional location/good school/AAU status. And, the fact that no one at ISU is talking, plus "connected people" seem to feel very comfortable right now when they shouldn't given what's being talked about in the media...

OMG, how awesome would that be? I don't want to get my hopes up, but maybe GG/JP have pulled a miracle from the hat. Regardless, I feel confident in them doing the best they can. Whatever we get is absolutely the top of what we COULD have gotten. If that's B1G, or Big East, or MWC, I know we couldn't have done better.
 
A B1G coach of a small sport...with a loud AD/staff...might know what is going on. Probably not, but it's certainly possible. Even at the biggest B1G schools, how many people are working full-time in an athletic department? It's not a huge number, especially if someone can't keep their mouth shut.
My guess is discussion of big 12 members has become national bar fodder. There will be lots of blips, squeeks, and hushes, but it will be discussed in front of people. Maybe some twelve year old twitter will get the ultimate scoop from listening to dad talk on the phone.
 
Last edited:
Believe him. He's our recruiting junkie, our "voice of the fan" in the weekly game picks, and he's been quoted in newspaper articles about Steele Jantz. If those aren't credentials, I don't know what are! :jimlad:
And he has not yet been proven to be the type to lead us on into oblivion. He said we are headed to the promised land (not BYU).
 
So, what is taking the SEC so long to offer aTm? Did they find out about the jar thing?
 
Here's my stupid question that has probably been answered in one of the other ~ 500 pages of this thread ...

If the Big XII blows up and say there are 4 teams left (I-State, K-State, KU, and Baylor) ... do they have a remedy in court? Or would the other 6 members owe their exit fees to the "remaining" four?
 
So, what is taking the SEC so long to offer aTm? Did they find out about the jar thing?

Has the SEC even acknowledged receiving an application from TAMU? In the "NU to Big Ten" saga, NU announced it's application to the Big Ten, and the Big Ten acknowledged receiving it. Of course, this one doesn't have to take that path, but it would seem reasonable that it would.
 
Just a slight clarification, but I do believe that aTm has to apply, then the SEC will vote to accept. Latest rumors had said aTm wouldn't apply until their bye week to avoid 'distraction' to their programs...
How nice of the purveyors of mason jars. What about the test of the freaking league. Maybe Tam should be the ND Irish since they are full of blarney.
 
Has the SEC even acknowledged receiving an application from TAMU? In the "NU to Big Ten" saga, NU announced it's application to the Big Ten, and the Big Ten acknowledged receiving it. Of course, this one doesn't have to take that path, but it would seem reasonable that it would.
Tam tried to send it by USPS or pony express, but they had went to interim mail delibvery and the package was lost. However, the SEC mason jar shipment did arrive.
 
Here's my stupid question that has probably been answered in one of the other ~ 500 pages of this thread ...

If the Big XII blows up and say there are 4 teams left (I-State, K-State, KU, and Baylor) ... do they have a remedy in court? Or would the other 6 members owe their exit fees to the "remaining" four?

I wish I knew. (bumpin to keep at the forefront)

This could be the piece holding the cookie from crumbling. That scenario could lead to an entire years worth of TV revenue split between 4 teams. (I assumed they shored this up last summer)
 
Here's my stupid question that has probably been answered in one of the other ~ 500 pages of this thread ...

If the Big XII blows up and say there are 4 teams left (I-State, K-State, KU, and Baylor) ... do they have a remedy in court? Or would the other 6 members owe their exit fees to the "remaining" four?

Four teams ≠ a conference. It would dissolve with a majority vote per conference bylaws and no exit penalties would be withheld.
 
I wish I knew. (bumpin to keep at the forefront)

This could be the piece holding the cookie from crumbling. That scenario could lead to an entire years worth of TV revenue split between 4 teams. (I assumed they shored this up last summer)

Pretty sure if there are only 4 or 5 teams left the league is dissolved so there wouldn't be any exit fees to be paid.
 
so we know for a fact that the Big 12 did not shore up the exit fee penalty and league dissolving process?

* even if 4 teams are left and the league is "dissolved" there is still a giant pot of TV $ that is to be paid out. I would gues the 4 or 5 left overs would have some substantial legal arguments to getting a large portion of that.
 
Has there been any interest expressed by Iowa politicians? It seems that the athletic program (football) is self supporting at a BCS school otherwise, not so much.
 
From the Commish:

Dear Tam,

Here is how many teams now in the Top 20 per Sagarin by conference:

SEC - 6
B12 - 3
Pac 12 - 3
ACC - 2
B1G - 3
MWC - 2
BE - 0

Honey, Are you sure you want to become a bigger also ran in the SEC?

Signed,
Beebe the Magnificent
 
It defies reason that MU would refuse the BigTen and accept the SEC invitation. That really makes no sense to me. Unless the SEC was guaranteeing a re-worked TV contract under expansion, the numbers we have read indicate that the BigTen money would at least match the SEC number if not exceed it. From a competitive standpoint, MU would be much, much better off in just about any BigTen versus SEC arrangement in my opinion.

Cheers

Missouri Tigers Athletics :: Mizzou College Sports :: TigerBoard.com :: Based on what I was told...

Big Ten proposed a tiered structure for new members. However, I am pretty sure that Nebraska is not getting a full share for several years, so why would MU get a full share?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.