VT to the SEC is a rumor that is out there.
And VT's AD and Pres have both said they are not interested.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
VT to the SEC is a rumor that is out there.
If the Big East takes some more teams, I hope the basketball only schools like Depaul, Seton Hall, etc. all leave and go to the MVC or some other basketball only conference. The Big East should only have teams that provide division 1 football and basketball.
VT, MIZZOU, A&M and Clemson join SEC
Tech, Texas, OU and OSU join PAC-12
ACC I think will stay at 10 teams.
BIGEAST will poach remaining BIGXII teams.
And VT's AD and Pres have both said they are not interested.
This whole thing makes me kind of sick. The Big East is our best option, but it is not a good option nor are we a lock for the Big East. The Big East is unstable and adding the likes of us doesn't make it stable. Plus, we are probably the least desirable team to get poached by the Big East. Missouri, Kansas, Kansas State (who no matter what they say, will fight to included with Kansas and will likely win) are all more desirable. We have politicians in this state that basically said, sucks to be you, good luck to Iowa State last year.
If we go to another conference, we can kiss Rhoads and Pollard goodbye. I'd put the chances of keeping them at 50% even if we go to the Big East.
I also hate the idea of playing east coast schools. No more Kansas City Big 12 tournaments. No easy road trips to see the team on the road. Even now, it's easy to get to Missouri, Kansas, and Kansas State. The Oklahoma teams are even sort of close. WE can kiss any sort of media coverage goodbye.
I'll support Iowa State no matter what, but there will be even fewer of us.
Based on what?! You realize our revenue will GO UP from where it is today if we go BE. Yes, it won't be what it would have been in the new Big 12 but the BE is still looking at around 18-22 million a year in TV revenue once their new contract comes up. That is SIGNIFICANLY more than we get now. So how do we lose a couple guys that obviously like ISU when we will get MORE money?
I understand the Big 12 from a revenue standpoint is the best thing for us but everybody keeps thinking the BE crappy tv contract will remain in place...just not true. They are looking at getting a big payday very soon and ISU would be apart of that....hopefully.
I think you are right, BE money would be ok after their new contract. I would much rather have B12, because playing Cinncy and Lville does not excite me, but if it comes to that I can accept it. Having Rice or UAB roll into Jack Trice would be a different story, but I think it is a pretty long shot that happens.
Sure, because a passionate fanbase and integrity are the two biggest keys for us to be able to bring in the money that we currently do.
Big 12 is done. OU wants to go to the Pac-12 and the Pac-12 will take them, along with OSU.
I will be honest, if ISU ends up in the mountain west or CUSA, I will never watch college football again, there would almost be no point. I would still support the school and watch the basketball games occasionally, but going there would be a death sentence to the program. And the thought of Iowa beating us every year by 30 makes me sick to my stomach.
Iowa State can, in no way financially justify leaving the Big 12 except to join the Big Ten.
What exactly are the odds of that happening? Would it make sense for the Big10 to sweep up ISU, Mizzou, KU, and KSU to get to 16?
What exactly are the odds of that happening? Would it make sense for the Big10 to sweep up ISU, Mizzou, KU, and KSU to get to 16?
Iowa State can, in no way financially justify leaving the Big 12 except to join the Big Ten.