I thought I read somewhere The Big Ten West existed for 11 years, Iowa made the championship game 3 times, 2 stompings and 1 loss at the gun.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobody in LA gives 2 poops about college football.They are not going to show up.
In the beginning, the B12N was the stronger division with 4 ranked teams IIRC. The power shifted south after the TX schools were legitimized again and OU hired Stoops.Agree and disagree about the B12 north. Near the end it was like the B10 west and would get smacked by the south in the championship.
Hot take but I think if ISU, Baylor, and Kansas were where they are now as far as program strength and investment, the old B12 is still together. There was so much dead weight in those days including ISU. If there were some solid middle/upper mid tier schools in the mix I don’t think folks would have jumped
The fact Iowa made two conference championships with the worst offense in America is both unbelievable and a huge testament to the defense and special teams.I thought I read somewhere The Big Ten West existed for 11 years, Iowa made the championship game 3 times, 2 stompings and 1 loss at the gun.
SC has to be 9-0 before people start showing up. It has to be the 'in' thing.Nobody in LA gives 2 poops about college football.
Agree, but it doesn't matter because Auburn just declared themselves the '97 national champ, so UM and NU supporters can stand down.How old are you?
This sounds like an argument that someone who wasn't alive/following sports in 1997 would make. The AP was the gold standard prior to the BCS.
SC has to be 9-0 before people start showing up. It has to be the 'in' thing.
SC is both a great job and terrible job all at once.
The Pirates teams are getting lost here. They struggled to be UT and OU but ran wild over about everyone else, including bowl games and nonconf.ISU had Nebraska, Colorado and K-State every year. Back when they were all pretty good. Then Oklahoma and Texas. 2 out of every four years. Don' t forget Mizzou and Kansas had some really good teams back then as well. Havent even mentioned aTm or Texas Tech. Much tougher schedule?
And it's not a larger margin regardless of what iowa fans say.This is the first year in decades Iowa's had a tougher schedule than ISU.
Kirk holds the loss record too. This isn't about being the "winningest" but one of the longest tenured coaches in the big. That's meaningful, especially in this day an age. A lot of positives aligned for kirk in his career but you still have to run a successful program and win the games in front of you. He's going to hold the record for a looooong time.They actually have more chances to beat a ranked team this year. When was the last time the *winningest coach beat a ranked team or played a schedule worth mentioning?
*Big 10 West Division
SC has to be 9-0 before people start showing up. It has to be the 'in' thing.
SC is both a great job and terrible job all at once.
Had a Hawkeye fan chirp at me last week about Kirk breaking the record. I told him ‘win or lose Ferentz will set a new record every week’.Kirk holds the loss record too. This isn't about being the "winningest" but one of the longest tenured coaches in the big. That's meaningful, especially in this day an age. A lot of positives aligned for kirk in his career but you still have to run a successful program and win the games in front of you. He's going to hold the record for a looooong time.
When you are around that long, you are eventually going to get the all time winning record... and losing record. It's simply a matter of numbers at that point.Had a Hawkeye fan chirp at me last week about Kirk breaking the record. I told him ‘win or lose French will set a new record every week’.
Not surprisingly, I had to explain it to him.
We're actually closing in on the 9 year anniversary of Kirk becoming the "losingest" coach in B1G history! He passed up some guy named Hayden Fry to take that title.When you are around that long, you are eventually going to get the all time winning record... and losing record. It's simply a matter of numbers at that point.
Hayes has a far better winning % in the Big 10 than Kirky.
Hayes: 205-61-10
Ferentz: 206-125
Nobody in LA gives 2 poops about college football.
I think our schedule last year was tougher as well. You guys missed the three best teams in the Big 12 other than ISU last year. Happens again this year, there are only two other ranked teams in the Big 12 and you guys miss them both. We play two conference opponents currently ranked in the top-6 and four that are ranked.This is the first year in decades Iowa's had a tougher schedule than ISU.
That’s the way it panned out, but going into the year Utah was supposed to be much betterI think our schedule last year was tougher as well. You guys missed the three best teams in the Big 12 other than ISU last year. Happens again this year, there are only two other ranked teams in the Big 12 and you guys miss them both. We play two conference opponents currently ranked in the top-6 and four that are ranked.
Good thing Pat is getting the job in Iowa City in a couple years to keep those numbers going!We're actually closing in on the 9 year anniversary of Kirk becoming the "losingest" coach in B1G history! He passed up some guy named Hayden Fry to take that title.
Eventually Pat Fitzgerald would squeeze into the #2 spot between the two hawks.