I'm sure I'm biased but it definitely seemed like the Iowa OLine got away with a lot of holdsI just wish the holding calls would've gone both directions...
View attachment 156117View attachment 156118
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sure I'm biased but it definitely seemed like the Iowa OLine got away with a lot of holdsI just wish the holding calls would've gone both directions...
View attachment 156117View attachment 156118
Questionable officiating calls are just part of football at every level. Fans that lose immediately whine about “bad” calls which is exactly what I have Iowa fans always go to when ISU wins. I expect our Special Teams coach will get an earful from CMC concerning why our punt receiver was reaching for the ball, he should have not been near that ball.I'm not going to look for it but it's in the broadcast in slow motion; the ball grazed X's arm and it was the first time it touched a player from either team.
There were some bad/non calls for sure that helped Iowa out but not everything has to put ISU as a victim.
As I have shared now multiple times in the last couple days, it was very clearly catch interference by iowa. Not kind of. Not well, it was close and I could see it being called both ways. No, it was very clear and obvious catch interference. It's an easy call 100 times out of 100. Which is why the official three the flag instantly. He saw it, noticed it, correctly and instantly reacted with a flag because it was such an easy and obvious thing to call.I've watched the replay 100 times. What I see is that as the ball goes past his arm, X's hand moves and maybe you could say you see muscle/skin on his forearm "ripple". The thing I disagree about is that those things are clear evidence of the ball touching him. If you look at the totality of the movement you see that he was trying to grasp the ball in a hugging motion. What we see could be just him in the process of beginning that motion. I see no evidence of the ball changing spin or direction.
As someone else said, when you have to go to Zapruder level film analysis, you're well outside any clear evidence. Since the refs let it play out and Iowa recovered, you have to leave it called that way.
Annnnnd, all of that should be moot, because it was clearly catch interference. Our guy blocking did exactly as he should have and released his block yards before they got to the landing point of the punt. How the picked up the flag is the biggest mystery to me. The head ref announced that without even huddling up with the other refs.
Call me a pessimist or a negative strategist, but that first down call for Iowa where the ref 'left' his position to stop aggressive post play activity and (corrected after watching the replay) he dropped his bean bag well before the yard to gain. Oddly, however, when he got back he just picked it up. There must be some rule that says if you have to leave your position, you defer judgement to another ref. But, if that's the case, why even drop your bean bag? A very odd sequence of events.I was on a high school chain gang one year, and yeah … ball spotting is very imprecise, and then the chains are set from the foot of the side official - who is remembering where the front of the ball is between the yard markers way off in the middle of the field anyway.
But you gotta have some system.
I mean this is an ultra biased take on everything verging into a conspiracy theory that the refs tried to rig the game because Iowa was "on the verge of an ass beating" in the first quarter of a 6-0 game.As I have shared now multiple times in the last couple days, it was very clearly catch interference by iowa. Not kind of. Not well, it was close and I could see it being called both ways. No, it was very clear and obvious catch interference. It's an easy call 100 times out of 100. Which is why the official three the flag instantly. He saw it, noticed it, correctly and instantly reacted with a flag because it was such an easy and obvious thing to call.
The decision for another official to run in and huddle with that official, and then decide to pick up the flag, making it so there is no official penalty on record, was very purposeful. They know specifically what situations are reviewable and are not reviewable.
Iowa was extremely desperate and it was clear they were on the verge of an ass beating. So "fate" intervened. Funny the timing!
Meh. The kid called for a fair catch and when he did so there wasn't any one near him. He was concentrating on catching the ball when he was ran into.Questionable officiating calls are just part of football at every level. Fans that lose immediately whine about “bad” calls which is exactly what I have Iowa fans always go to when ISU wins. I expect our Special Teams coach will get an earful from CMC concerning why our punt receiver was reaching for the ball, he should have not been near that ball.
I'm sure I'm biased but it definitely seemed like the Iowa OLine got away with a lot of holds
Questionable officiating calls are just part of football at every level. Fans that lose immediately whine about “bad” calls which is exactly what I have Iowa fans always go to when ISU wins. I expect our Special Teams coach will get an earful from CMC concerning why our punt receiver was reaching for the ball, he should have not been near that ball.
You on not biased on that... they did get away with a TON of holds.I'm sure I'm biased but it definitely seemed like the Iowa OLine got away with a lot of holds
Questionable officiating calls are just part of football at every level. Fans that lose immediately whine about “bad” calls which is exactly what I have Iowa fans always go to when ISU wins. I expect our Special Teams coach will get an earful from CMC concerning why our punt receiver was reaching for the ball, he should have not been near that ball.
I normally think it evens out, but it seemed every questionable call went their way on Saturday.
FWIW it did look like it grazed X’s hand/wrist when they slowed it frame by frame. It was likely enough to make it “inconclusive”. I’m not a fan of 3 minute forensics on these reviews. Take a look and make a call.
That said, he was clearly interfered with by the Iowa player so it should’ve been a non issue.
Pre-throw:It was a close call but if I were an Iowa fan the one call I’d be pissed about is I did think that one pass to flat from Rocco was backwards and a 5 yard loss.
Everything else was Iowa favors all day including holding and pi major discrepancies depending on the team. Teams were chippy all game and at least the unsportsmanlike calls evened 1:1. On our unsportsmanlike it was clear Iowa players were chippy too, maybe same case on theirs, who knows.
The biggest favor they gifted Iowa was probably when Gron got stuffed and they gave him a 3rd down conversion for no reason.


It's where the ball is released though, still forward and they got it right IMO, but it's pretty darn close.Pre-throw:
View attachment 156124
Post-throw:
View attachment 156126
Rocco is standing on the 28-yard line when he turns to throw, the ball skips on the 29-yard line.
Chains ARE technology you knowNFL this year has started using technology.