Yearly Matt Campbell to ?? Thread

The beach in LA/Santa Monica was gross. The nicest part was definitely the Griffith Observatory and the surrounding park but the rest of it was a completely underwhelming large city. Not much unique in terms of things to relative to Chicago, imo.
I'm sure Malibu or other similar 0.1%er places are nice but I didn't visit those
“I only went to the overly crowded tourist areas that locals never step foot in unless they are forced to and I hated it. Whole area is a dump”
 
I'm no expert on the topic, but in my experience its rare to hear somebody that raves about a trip to LA (work or vacation), however it seems common to hear people who live there/have lived there be much more positive about LA.
I have some relatives that were the opposite. They fell in love with LA and Cali on vacation. Started going on yearly vacations there and decided to jump in and move there. They didn't make it a year until they moved back. Turns out they loved the vacation side of Cali/LA but the living side wasn't what it was cracked up to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone
I'm no expert on the topic, but in my experience its rare to hear somebody that raves about a trip to LA (work or vacation), however it seems common to hear people who live there/have lived there be much more positive about LA.
It’s like the Ankeny of California. All you outsiders **** all over it, but the enlightened know it’s 10/10.
 
SoCal is the greatest place in America. In almost 20 years I never ran out of things to do or places to see. Cool people. Great weather. Great lifestyle

Chicago could burn to the ground tomorrow and I'd help throw gas on the fire.

LA has issues. It isn't perfect, but a wealthy head coach isn't going to have the same daily headaches as a typical bloke.
Well, I think you’re ~400 miles off on the greatest place in America, but agree SoCal is nice.

My Bay Area born-and-raised teenager fell in love with Chicago after a day walking around the city. She has spent a good bit of time in Manhattan and thought Chicago was better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: burn587
I frequently mock small town people who fear cities, but LA is my least favorite place I've ever visited. All you do there is sit, wait, and pay out the nose for everything.
In Iowa, if you say something is 10 miles away, that usually correlates to a 10 minute(ish) drive. In LA, ten miles usually equates to a 90 minute drive, in my experience.
 
SoCal is the greatest place in America. In almost 20 years I never ran out of things to do or places to see. Cool people. Great weather. Great lifestyle

Chicago could burn to the ground tomorrow and I'd help throw gas on the fire.

LA has issues. It isn't perfect, but a wealthy head coach isn't going to have the same daily headaches as a typical bloke.
If people googled Lincoln Riley’s house and neighborhood they’d probably change their mind.

I live in LA fwiw. Miami is the only city I really didn’t like. Dallas and Houston were whatever to me. Absolutely love Chicago and NYC. Like any city or town, individual neighborhoods are a much better representation of the culture than the major tourist areas.
 
Wouldn’t be surprised if the bengals came after Campbell at the end of the season (or sooner). Their coaching staff is a disaster and another underachieving year there should make them clean house. The owner is cheapskate so he might try an unproven NFL coach to save money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew0311
Wouldn’t be surprised if the bengals came after Campbell at the end of the season (or sooner). Their coaching staff is a disaster and another underachieving year there should make them clean house. The owner is cheapskate so he might try an unproven NFL coach to save money.


I can see Matt leaving at some point. Maybe even after the season. I don't live in a fairy tale world where all of our coaches are locked in to stay. Fred and Cael convinced me that any of our coaches could move jobs. Hope we keep Matt and TJ but say someone like that packers job came open, That would be a legendary job that I could see someone taking.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: stuclone and Peter
I have some relatives that were the opposite. They fell in love with LA and Cali on vacation. Started going on yearly vacations there and decided to jump in and move there. They didn't make it a year until they moved back. Turns out they loved the vacation side of Cali/LA but the living side wasn't what it was cracked up to be.
I’ve heard similar things about other parts of California (either people that loved traveling there or didn’t like it when living there when they thought they would) like San Diego, places a little farther from LA like Santa Barbara/Palm Springs, Sonoma/Napa, etc. But that would be new to me to hear about LA and the close suburbs.
 
“I only went to the overly crowded tourist areas that locals never step foot in unless they are forced to and I hated it. Whole area is a dump”
I guess my takeaway is that I generally like or at least enjoy the overcrowded tourist areas in most places I visit. I mean I went downtown, Bevery Hills, Santa Monica, most of Hollywood. All of it pretty meh as far as tourist attractions go. I'm sure living there is fun, I mean multi-millions of people do so it can't be terrible, but it was not at all for me. I was simply echoing that sentiment that was also contained in the original post I replied to.
 
The beach in LA/Santa Monica was gross. The nicest part was definitely the Griffith Observatory and the surrounding park but the rest of it was a completely underwhelming large city. Not much unique in terms of things to relative to Chicago, imo.
I'm sure Malibu or other similar 0.1%er places are nice but I didn't visit those
Any small bit of research would have told you to skip Santa Monica. Head south. Much better beaches.
 
having visited LA and it is horrible. And this isn't coming from some bumpkin who's never seen a druggie or a homeless guy before, I live IN Chicago (Avondale/Logan Square for those who know). LA is basically the worst parts of suburban living at 198273412 times the cost combined with all the downsides of living in the center of a big city, and none of the upsides.
I don’t fear large cities or anything and I’m sure there are good places in LA but the traffic alone is enough for me to say **** that
 
In Iowa, if you say something is 10 miles away, that usually correlates to a 10 minute(ish) drive. In LA, ten miles usually equates to a 90 minute drive, in my experience.
I mean this is def true if you leave at rush hour. But it's not true at all when you plan accordingly. I travel to LA every month for work and have zero issues getting around and experiencing the various towns though I tend to stick closer to the beach cities these days as that's where work is.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: cyfanatic
I mean this is def true if you leave at rush hour. But it's not true at all when you plan accordingly. I travel to LA every month for work and have zero issues getting around and experiencing the various towns though I tend to stick closer to the beach cities these days as that's where work is.

Life in SoCal certainly can take some planning and organization in terms of getting places...but if you do that...the payoff is a lot of fun...whether it is a day at the beach, boating/skiing/playing in the mountains, concerts in regional parks...all sorts of good stuff!
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron