Where Will ISU End Up if the Big 12 Implodes?

Where Will ISU End Up If the Big 12 Implodes?


  • Total voters
    918
  • Poll closed .

cytor

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 20, 2011
6,136
9,405
113
No Texas people are saying that, what they are saying is they are currently losing kids in the state of Texas because they believe to make the NFL they have to play in the SEC. So kids that would have before chosen UT are now going to aTm and other SEC schools because of the idea that is where the future pros play.
If texas is losing recruits to other schools, get better coaches. No conference change is going to makes Texas better. Cant wait to boo the **** out of them this fall in Ames
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
16,951
10,740
113
I rechecked and edited my post. But don’t hold your breath.
I will hold my tongue. Can't talk politics here.

Nothing else important at this time anyway. It's ISU or bust. We will get thru this.

?
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
16,951
10,740
113
The day ISU joins the AAC is my last day as an ISU fan...and I'm in the majority of ISU fans on that.
I mean, I think most everyone would still love Iowa State, but I think most of us couldn’t stomach being in the AAC and playing Tulsa, Tulane, ECU, etc every week does absolutely nothing for me.
Yeah AAC meh. Not to be negative to them, but we are used to P5 for so long now and just starting to blossom.

When I first read this I thought you were talking ACC, and I went, Oh really, hadn't heard that yet.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
11,133
17,001
113
At the very least Rutgers allowed the big 10 to completely own the NY and NJ recruiting grounds which was part of the plan. It's easier for Big 10 schools to get players from there.
Big 10, particularly PSU, OSU and UM, have largely owned NJ for years. Hell, Fry used pull a lot of guys from NJ. At best the difference is every couple of years Purdue or Wisconsin will get a guy from there, and it certainly helps Rutgers as long as Schiano is there.

And go look at 2021 recruits from Iowa vs NY. Iowa absolutely blows NY away. NY has two guys above an 86. Iowa has 15. The top two recruits in NY would be tied for 8th in Iowa per 247. It’s much closer in 2022 but Iowa is still better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cycl0nepower

CentexCyclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2015
4,759
3,772
113
If texas is losing recruits to other schools, get better coaches. No conference change is going to makes Texas better. Cant wait to boo the **** out of them this fall in Ames

Texas would have an easier road improving their on field performance in the Big 12. But maybe getting curb stomped by SEC teams for a decade will finally cause Texas to clean out the cultural deadwood that has been holding them back.
 

cyclone1209

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2010
3,627
2,127
113
Denver
I'd be down for that. That league would have some legitimacy.
At this point I do think we are a "likely" for the Big Ten.

Not a sure shot, but there's enough smoke like the nbc chicago news report about us and Kansas on a call with big ten people.

If you want to add a good midwest brand to the big ten with lots of fans, quality football, usually good basketball, we check a lot of boxes. Population footprint is not an issue this time around, it's about the brand following.
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
5,171
5,907
113
that list has been expanded substantially, Pretty much none of the Big 12 or most other conferences would work for them Including Iowa, Kansas, and Oklahoma.

 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
5,171
5,907
113
If that’s ever updated…Iowa is okay, for now.
Nope the list has been expanded to include Iowa. Meaning those Cali schools cant take us, nor can they join the SEC or the B1G because of this law.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Turn2

AlaCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
4,253
4,836
113
At this point I do think we are a "likely" for the Big Ten.

Not a sure shot, but there's enough smoke like the nbc chicago news report about us and Kansas on a call with big ten people.

If you want to add a good midwest brand to the big ten with lots of fans, quality football, usually good basketball, we check a lot of boxes. Population footprint is not an issue this time around, it's about the brand following.
Two other things that help a KU-ISU combo:

It's a GREAT rivalry in Men's Basketball. Two biggest basketball arenas / attendance and two most passionate fan bases in Big Xii Hoops.

They put a really good pincer movement on the Kansas City Market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclone1209

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
5,171
5,907
113
I will hold my tongue. Can't talk politics here.

Nothing else important at this time anyway. It's ISU or bust. We will get thru this.

?
that article is almost 5 years old the list has been expanded substantially see my above post. Iowa is on the ban list now too.
 

simply1

Rec Center HOF
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 10, 2009
36,829
24,715
113
Pdx
Nope the list has been expanded to include Iowa. Meaning those Cali schools cant take us, nor can they join the SEC or the B1G because of this law.
They don’t use state funds to travel to these sites. You think no college team from a state university in California has been to any of those states in several years?
 

CyCrazy

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2008
26,145
13,796
113
Ames
I mean, I think most everyone would still love Iowa State, but I think most of us couldn’t stomach being in the AAC and playing Tulsa, Tulane, ECU, etc every week does absolutely nothing for me.

Yep my need to watch ISU religously would wane tremendously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclonehomer

AlaCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
4,253
4,836
113
**** that. Loyal sons forever true, regardless of the conference.
Right On!

FWIW, I sat through the 0-10-1 1994 season watching Iowa State lose to UNI (FCS), Western Michigan (MAC) ad Rice (SWC) in person! THAT was HARD!

As for the AAC, it's not so bad. The Champion is usually in the NY6 hunt and will be more than likely make the 12 Team Playoff when it starts.

That being said, I am on Team B1G First, Team Pac Second, but I am not going to stop being a game day fan if they end up in the AAC. Will actually give Iowa State the opportunity to open up some quality OOC scheduling.
 
Last edited:

Triggermv

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
7,815
4,276
113
39
Marion, IA
Just curious if there has been any insider info on the premium boards related to this that hasn't been on the public boards? You don't have to tell me what it is, but just curious if there currently is anything to gain by signing up.
 

CrossCyed

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
10,827
2,270
113
At this point I do think we are a "likely" for the Big Ten.

Not a sure shot, but there's enough smoke like the nbc chicago news report about us and Kansas on a call with big ten people.

If you want to add a good midwest brand to the big ten with lots of fans, quality football, usually good basketball, we check a lot of boxes. Population footprint is not an issue this time around, it's about the brand following.





NBC Chicago was just referring to that same tweet about Kansas. Who knows how accurate it is, but you have to be careful when you think something corroborates something and its just referring to the same thing.
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
5,171
5,907
113
They don’t use state funds to travel to these sites. You think no college team from a state university in California has been to any of those states in several years?
Yeah I suppose you are right, as long as you are using "in-house" money it is ok, even though you are state sanctioned and sponsored, if the money comes technically from athletic income it would be ok.
Kind of takes the point of this law away except for symbolism.