Why in God's name did we chose the south end in OT. What a ******* fail...
It had no effect on the outcome whatsoever. Maybe if we could catch the ball, that touchdown would have been for the tie.
I'm not saying it's why we lost. We lost because we couldn't stop Iowa and our offense lost their way. But there is no advantage to playing in the south end for ISU, and we chose that end.Definitely wasn't the reason ISU lost, but I did wonder why they picked the end away from the students.
Yes I agree, but it's going to be louder on our offense in the south with their band on the SE side and their fans on the SW side. I'm not sure it would of made a difference, but we made it harder on ourselves by chosing the south side. No question.Honestly our stadium would have been quite in ot whether it was on south or north side. Game was over honestly when it went to ot.
I actually know the answer to this...Why in God's name did we chose the south end in OT. What a ******* fail...
Well if folks are ******** about this, this team is light years ahead of last year. That is a good sign.Why in God's name did we chose the south end in OT. What a ******* fail...
There is no advantage playing in the south end for ISU. It was a bad call by our captains.
apparently the middle end.Simply put, and I'm a little drunk fwiw, but what end do we have the advantage in?
Disagree 100%. Students are louder.Except that the entire endzone is surrounded by tens of thousands of fans when the other endzone has a crappy building and the band in the endzone. The students are loud, but not as loud as an entire endzone of 2 tiers of fans.
Disagree 100%. Students are louder.
You gave me a picture of the North side on media day. The band usually sits there on game day, and is allowed to play in-between downs.Pound for Pound yes, but there are 3x as many fans in the other end zone, which IMO equalizes it.
Fans aside, as a visiting offense, which of these would you rather be playing towards?
Or