I'm much more concerned about what this loss means to our NCAA chances.
Maybe I am overreacting, but this team may miss the NIT. Gonna be 8-5 in non-con. Need to be 8-10 in conference to be over .500 overall. I am not confident they can get there.
I'm much more concerned about what this loss means to our NCAA chances.
so you dont like campbell either b/c he's 0-4
When was the last time that Campbell’s team wasn’t competitive in a game?
I'm not thinking he is anything special as a coach, and although I've defended him in the past, I am cooling on him just a bit. Not that I think we need to consider running him out of town though. I don't think we could get anyone better currently. He recruits at a high level and I do think he's a decent leader of young men. The problem seems to be x's and o's as others have alleged. We seem to get out schemed frequently. This could be alleviated by hiring a decent assistant or associate head coach with a nose for that kind of stuff.
I honestly think he can achieve similar success as coaches like Scott Drew or Bruce Weber, and those guys are all pretty qualified head basketball coaches.
Some of the motivational/personality management issues are concerning (Lard, McKay, Wigginton) but I believe it has more to do with Steve sincerely trying to help these guys out as people too, and not just ball players. And I respect him for that, even if it occasionally gets in the way of team success.
I guess you could say that. Honestly though, our guys helped them out by missing pretty open looks. It was part of Iowa's scheme to let us shoot them though, and shoot them they did. We didn't really MAKE Iowa play d
The inconsistency in his teams' performances takes years off my life. We'll drop some game at home we should never lose in a million years, and then with our backs against the wall we'll go on the road and beat a conference title contender. We feel like we're back on track and then we sleepwalk again. We show toughness at times and wilt at others.
People complain about stubbornness with rotations and starters and I'm coming around to that critique myself. I always felt like the way he handled Lard was just so...weird. All the talk of "habits," never declaring whether he was suspended or not, not playing him when he wasn't suspended. I'm sure Lard was mostly at fault, but if Prohm was sending the same mixed signals to Lard that he sent to the public I can see why Lard would get frustrated. And if that happens to one player, it's not hard to imagine it happening to more.
What isn't helpful is for this to devolve into a pile-on, which I'm in danger of doing myself. So I'll shut up now.
yes, every year he has a handful of bad games. Name a coach that doesn’t. NAME ONE.
My thoughts are that there are better coaches out there. I just don't know that we could get any of those coaches. HOT TAKE
During ISU's stronger eras did it become normalized to see ISU get beat at home?
Maybe I am overreacting, but this team may miss the NIT. Gonna be 8-5 in non-con. Need to be 8-10 in conference to be over .500 overall. I am not confident they can get there.
awful analogy...campbell started with zero. Prohm started with NBA guys. Football and BB can't be compared...especially within the confines of ISU history. Finally, people aren't simply talking about the Iowa game...it's the entire body of work.
Go back to every in game post and see how much crap we spew at him for KOs, FGs, procedure penalties, throwing when we should be running, running when we should be throwing, not going for the throat going into half, giving up points going into half... Large amount of posts about lack of discipline which is a coaching failure they say.
Little bit of recency bias I'd say even though CMC's team under achieved this year according to some.
they might accept he’s gone but they inflate his results.
Iowa had a great game plan. Come out firing, be aggressive and try to get ahead. We can't score enough to make large come backs.well it is more about ISU shooting, Iowa hit something like 6 or 7 3's to start the game, with ISU's lack of shooting it was pretty much over at that point.
Losing to Kirk is a lot different than losing to Fran. One is an actual good head coach, and the other one is a meme due to his temper tantrums in games. I'm not sure why people are being so intentionally obtuse about this(well, I do know, but that's not related to the point.) The only thing Kirk and Fran have in common is that they both coach sports at Iowa. It's like if people were trying to compare Fred to Paul Rhoads.so you dont like campbell either b/c he's 0-4
Do you actually understand how damaging telling the fans what he told cam would be for any other relationship he has with his players?
holy **** that’s bad.
well it is more about ISU shooting, Iowa hit something like 6 or 7 3's to start the game, with ISU's lack of shooting it was pretty much over at that point.