With the so called fight between the Big 10 and SEC about conference games. Would it be better to require at least 10 P4 games vs the number of conf games. I mean part of the issue is the SEC believes they are so overpowered now that they cant, but I say, they are the ones that wanted all those teams, now they have to deal with it. That being said they are padding their schedules with multiple G5 and lower games. Several rarely play 10 P4 games where it is a requirement for the B12.
So Maybe they need to change the required games, similar to only 1 FCS game counts towards wins. Maybe they need to say only 1 G5 game counts, or teams must play 10 power games to get into playoff. That would at least even up the schedules a bit. Although it would cause an issue for the G5 inclusion in the playoff.
So Maybe they need to change the required games, similar to only 1 FCS game counts towards wins. Maybe they need to say only 1 G5 game counts, or teams must play 10 power games to get into playoff. That would at least even up the schedules a bit. Although it would cause an issue for the G5 inclusion in the playoff.