UNC is a top-5 public university, that's a huge part of their identity, I'd see that as more of a driver of where they want to be.They just seem like they're one of those proud southern states.
UNC is a top-5 public university, that's a huge part of their identity, I'd see that as more of a driver of where they want to be.They just seem like they're one of those proud southern states.
I kinda disagree on this. Belichick brings similar things as prime (not in the personality part) but in that people will watch just to see them fail and others will be cheering for them to succeed.
Add in the fact that sports media will be tripping over themselves to cover this the way they do with prime and I would also expect a sizable ratings jump. If they actually do ok (I don’t think they will) that number will go even higher like when Colorado is ranked.
They aren’t a great fit in either, they are honestly the best fit where they are currently. Hopefully the ACC just stays intactI disagree. Culturally they're more of a fit for the SEC than the Big 10, plus they'd have Vandy in the same conference for academics.
If there were betting odds, I would agree their odds to the Big 10 are better than the SEC. I do think that being in the 'Southern' conference is a big selling point for a lot of their fan base though. And while the SEC is not the Big 10 academically speaking, being in the same conference as Vanderbilt can be a selling point for the academic folks there if the invitation ever comes.UNC is a top-5 public university, that's a huge part of their identity, I'd see that as more of a driver of where they want to be.
I agree but you meant to include the pac12 right? I would love to go back to six 10-12 team leagues but I have have a better chance of waking up next to Brooklyn Decker tomorrow morning than putting this monster back in the jar.If there were betting odds, I would agree their odds to the Big 10 are better than the SEC. I do think that being in the 'Southern' conference is a big selling point for a lot of their fan base though. And while the SEC is not the Big 10 academically speaking, being in the same conference as Vanderbilt can be a selling point for the academic folks there if the invitation ever comes.
In the end this is all stupid. There is no going back but really wish we could just go back to the Big 12, Big 10, SEC, ACC, and Big East.
Yes, meant to include themI agree but you meant to include the pac12 right? I would love to go back to six 10-12 team leagues but I have have a better chance of waking up next to Brooklyn Decker tomorrow morning than putting this monster back in the jar.
I agree, but it ain't happening. And I don't see the ACC surviving. The only thing that has kept them hanging on by the skin of their teeth is the GoR that will eventually expire.If there were betting odds, I would agree their odds to the Big 10 are better than the SEC. I do think that being in the 'Southern' conference is a big selling point for a lot of their fan base though. And while the SEC is not the Big 10 academically speaking, being in the same conference as Vanderbilt can be a selling point for the academic folks there if the invitation ever comes.
In the end this is all stupid. There is no going back but really wish we could just go back to the Big 12, Big 10, Pac 12, SEC, ACC, and Big East.
During Sherman’s march Georgia told him you better treat South Carolina worse that you did us and in the march of the Carolina’s, Sherman was a lot softer on NC than SC because of it had more pro union sentiment. A lot of southern states hate each other and some of that sentiment carries to this day. That’s why I always thought it would be odd if NC ever joined a true all confederate conference.They just seem like they're one of those proud southern states.
Fine unless it kills the b12.They aren’t a great fit in either, they are honestly the best fit where they are currently. Hopefully the ACC just stays intact
That’s a throw back name, well doneI agree but you meant to include the pac12 right? I would love to go back to six 10-12 team leagues but I have have a better chance of waking up next to Brooklyn Decker tomorrow morning than putting this monster back in the jar.
You’re probably right but I don’t see either the SEC or Big ten being too eager to add Clemson or FSU so I could see a future in survival.I agree, but it ain't happening. And I don't see the ACC surviving. The only thing that has kept them hanging on by the skin of their teeth is the GoR that will eventually expire.
I guess survive is a relative term, the PAC 12 still survives.How would it?
Love the new profile pic. Finally realize you fit in better with us than the Illini leftovers in IC?I agree, but it ain't happening. And I don't see the ACC surviving. The only thing that has kept them hanging on by the skin of their teeth is the GoR that will eventually expire.
UNC donors and alumni would revolt if they tried joining the SEC.
from the ACC tv ratings, im not sure who'd add value to the big 12 aside from miami, fsu, and clemson.
from the ACC tv ratings, im not sure who'd add value to the big 12 aside from miami, fsu, and clemson.
Belechick was also hired to teach them how to do moneyball-esque roster management. With NIL you need a GM as much as a coach.The idea that UNC hired Belichick to have the Deion effect seems like a stretch to me. Maybe not that that is what they were hoping, but that it will work out that way.
Deion brings the Deion factor, because of his personality and his outlandish character and actions etc. None of which I would say Belichick has even a slight bit of. Belichick as far as I know is known for a lack of personality more than anything.
The hire may bring a bit more eyes because it is such an outside the box hire, but I would not say because he brings the Deion factor.
I guess we will see how it goes.