Not sure only Utah/Kansas ranked is a meaningful thought. With player turnover in college, a teams success can vary for a lot of programs. MSU saw that a couple years ago. The Pac12 is benefitting from very experienced QB's in 2023. But can USC, UO, UW match that talent in 2024? Bama is showing there are no guarantees
Recruit rankings aren't the end all. Schools like Ohio State, Georgia, USC, Texas will always gobble up the 4/5 star kids. But as A&M has shown recruit rankings and NIL money is no guarantee of winning.
NIL or employee status might actually benefit the Big12 and ACC. Immediate playing time might be more desirable than being a backup. Playing time could mean more money.
IMO where the Big12 needs to be consistent is 3-4 teams each year in top 15 in preseason polls.