Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,729
66,100
113
LA LA Land
ur blind

its way down the list in the overall list.

at the bottom of the page there is a list of continuous, that is much shorter.

View attachment 115231

That's what I was thinking of. Didn't realize it was THE LONGEST never interrupted. That's worthy keeping around unless ISU/KSU split conferences.

106 years without missing a matchup is crazy.
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,647
7,505
113
That's surprising, and really good if true. Convincing Fix to pony up more money could not have been a walk in the park
If its true they got ORWA for 30M, that is a hell of a discount, considering that will be split 3 ways. Mean Fox probably had some extra $$. They get the 4 schools to the Big 12 for less than 48M total to Fox.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isucy86

cycloneML

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2008
5,207
2,071
113
Did you ever think in your lifetime you would see the demise of a national, powerhouse conference, completely dismantled in about 3 days? PAC 12 has some amazing traditions, rivalries, and a lot of national championships. It was gobbled up, and now will probably be just a memory for most people.

Kind of bittersweet, but more of a reflection of the greed and power of these universities. Money is the only thing that matters in college football, nothing else matters. Not the fans, not the alumni, not the coaches or staff, just the dollars. What an amazing turn of events, and like some have said, better to be at a crowded table, than to not be at the table at all.
This is where I’m at. The fans are the suckers here. Spend their money, time, emotion. Meanwhile, the institutions, administrators, and coaches generate generational wealth.
 

drmwevr08

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
7,669
3,692
113
Arizona
That's surprising, and really good if true. Convincing Fix to pony up more money could not have been a walk in the park
Fox: Ok, fine32 mil per school.
BY: Great thanks! Were in!

BY: How about for Colorado too...

Fox:...... ok, fine, I suppose.

BY: Great thanks!

and AZ, too, right?

Fox: :rolleyes: Really? ahhhhhh, From Tucson, right? Yeah, whatever, sure, god.


BY: Awesome, this is great.

Fox: What... what?

BY: And ASU has to tag along.

Fox: :mad:

BY: And probably Utah, too. :D

Fox: jfc. You're pushing your luck here.

BY: ;)

Fox: That's it, fine, ok but thats it. OK?

BY: Amazing! You won't regret it, I promise.

Fox: Now what?

BY: Uconn?

Fox: GTFO. Security!
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,647
7,505
113
That's what I was thinking of. Didn't realize it was THE LONGEST never interrupted. That's worthy keeping around unless ISU/KSU split conferences.

106 years without missing a matchup is crazy.

While K-State gets on my nerves at times, I really do hope they're a protected rival in the new configuration.
CY-Hawk goes back to 1894 with interuptions.

ISU/Mizzu and ISU/Neb, go back to 1896, but are currently not played.
Maybe someday they will restart, at least occasionally.
 

danvillecyclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2011
1,975
1,299
113
Is this a game of grab who you can, then sort it all out when the dust settles?

Above my pay-grade to see the high-level reasoning.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,912
8,402
113
Overland Park
Anyone remember an article from about 4-5 years ago where they discussed the possibility of Arizona schools joining Big 12? I can’t find it.
I know a few years ago CW had a few posts on the premium board about Arizona and Colorado interested in joining the Big12.
 

DSM4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 4, 2006
2,589
3,213
113
Altoona, IA
While K-State gets on my nerves at times, I really do hope they're a protected rival in the new configuration.
There are many ways you can do a schedule with 16 schools, some easier than others. The easiest with a 9-game FB schedule would be 3 protected rivals, then you play everyone else once every 2 years. For BB, you would still have the 3 protected rivals, and then play everyone else once = 18 games. And yes, this would mean PODS.

Again, lots of different ways you can schedule, but the numbers don't work out well with many different combinations if you are trying for some semblance of scheduling equality. The other "easiest" way is two 8-team divisions, but that is really just two separate conferences with a "non-con" scheduling agreement. Play the other 7 in your division, then play 2 in the other division. You'd only see those teams every 4 years, only every 8 years at your place. Basketball doesn't really work well with that setup, you would only have 4 games left each year against the other 8 schools.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,729
66,100
113
LA LA Land
CY-Hawk goes back to 1894 with interuptions.

ISU/Mizzu and ISU/Neb, go back to 1896, but are currently not played.
Maybe someday they will restart, at least occasionally.

I think 1 protected rivalry def makes sense in these crazy huge conferences not just for history but to build passion and relationships...two is pushing it with only 9 games but I'd be in favor. Three seems like overkill and can really start to affect the schedule strength unfairly in either direction.
 

BDAL23

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 16, 2019
124
277
63
Is this a game of grab who you can, then sort it all out when the dust settles?

Above my pay-grade to see the high-level reasoning.
It won’t be settled until there is one Super Conference I believe
ACC is next up. Then the Big and Sec will eventually merge leaving behind the dead weight in those conferences
 
  • Like
Reactions: agentbear

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,746
31,101
113
Behind you
Whoa.

Is this **** true???
Pretty normal for new members to come in at a reduced share that escalates yearly. Maybe not at a 50% share but B1G likely figured ORWA would take whatever they were offered as long as it's more than what the PAC will pay. USC did not want other PAC schools to follow, especially Oregon. So since USC came in at a full share, this gives them some gloat but also sends the message that USC isn't going to call shots in the conference.
 

FerShizzle

person slash genius
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 5, 2013
16,120
20,069
113
Des Moines
CY-Hawk goes back to 1894 with interuptions.

ISU/Mizzu and ISU/Neb, go back to 1896, but are currently not played.
Maybe someday they will restart, at least occasionally.
I remember the KU and NU rivalry dating back a really long time. Another casualty of realignment.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NWICY

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,005
3,120
113
West Virginia
It won’t be settled until there is one Super Conference I believe
ACC is next up. Then the Big and Sec will eventually merge leaving behind the dead weight in those conferences
What constitutes 'dead weight'? And who determines that? I think the B1G is too big and that will be trouble for them, but that conference actually 'imploding' seems unlikely given the viewership. Not sure how it's going to happen, but 'dead weight' in my opinion is the bottom 20% of the conference ... at best. I wouldn't want to determine who.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,912
8,402
113
Overland Park
I'm not wild about our 3 rivals potentially being ucf, wv, and cinncy...would not be a great outcome........I really hope they make Houston play those guys
Huh?

Our protected rivals will probably be three of KState, Kansas, Oklahoma State, Colorado, West Virgina, Cincinnati. I’d be shocked if UCF was one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tailg8er