Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

somecyguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2006
3,514
3,994
113
Honestly it’s beginning to sound a lot like the only part of ASU that doesn’t want to be in the Big 12 is the president that will become Stanford’s president in a few weeks.

Truthfully, I’d hate to screw ASU over and I’d DEFINITELY hate to screw AZ over because they’re victims of a conflict of interest.

Feels like he is playing the anti-Ann Richards role here.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jdoggivjc

exCyDing

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
5,608
10,102
113
This is the key.

ESPN isn’t going to shell out extra money for any ACC teams going to the SEC. They already have their TV rights, why pay extra for what they already have?

So if FSU/Clemson want out of the ACC, they’d have to go somewhere to get TV money from FOX/CBS, like the B1G. Which means paying the ACC a metric crap ton of cash to get out of the GOR. Which I really don’t see happening.
The only way anyone gets out of the ACC in the next 10 years is if they find a way to legally invalidate the GOR and media deal, but that seems highly, highly unlikely. I can't see the courts agreeing with a novel legal theory that lets a school out of this contract and GOR, but also doesn't unleash chaos across the sports and entertainment industries. For that reason, it's unlikely ESPN would accept the decision without an appeal, repeatedly if necessary.

So if ESPN doesn't want to pay way more for the same thing, and the ACC schools that aren't going to the B10 or SEC don't want to sell back the media rights, it's not going to happen anytime soon. Probably before 2035, but not before 2031.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,486
25,933
113
This Crow stuff is so silly. You can't possibly want to risk being the guy that didn't hop on the life raft and went down with the sinking ship just to prove a point. At this point, rescind your offer. Tell Arizona to figure out a way to come on their own or they aren't out. Screw ASU.
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,634
7,486
113
PAC-9 is getting 1 spot, every single year, in a 12 team playoff. Maybe.

an 18-team B1G is probably getting 4....3 minimum.
That can change though.
Its the top 6 champions....so the Pac 9 could be left out, especially if it goes below 9 without ORWA.

And that is just for 2 years. After that everything is up in the air how they qualify teams for the playoff, it will be reworked and revoted after the 2 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jsb

clone37

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2010
243
515
93
The theme song of this thread and all this realignment crap!

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
This Crow stuff is so silly. You can't possibly want to risk being the guy that didn't hop on the life raft and went down with the sinking ship just to prove a point. At this point, rescind your offer. Tell Arizona to figure out a way to come on their own or they aren't out. Screw ASU.

You keep forgetting Crow will become the Stanford president in a few weeks. He’s not thinking about what’s in the best interest of AZ or even ASU - he’s thinking about what’s best for Stanford. Which is why he’s a conflict of interest.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,139
35,656
113
I swear Stewie is on the PACX payroll.

You have to laugh at this thinking. So they are going to forego the security of being in the B1G and eventually being on equal footing financially to have a better chance of getting their ass handed to them in CFP once a year. Meanwhile they would fall behind financially and get zero exposure when they aren't in the CFP. Makes no sense.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,489
74,198
113
Ankeny
Also, Oregon & Washington are currently playing the Pac-12 for their benefit. Either using the meeting this morning to get a better deal from the Big 10 or unequal revenue sharing if they stay in the Pac. This is exactly the reason the Big 12 doesn't want/need Oregon/Washington. It would be Texas/Oklahoma 2.0 with brands that are worth far less than Texas/Oklahoma.

The big 12 is in a better position than the PAC though.

If they did join the big 12, the big 12 isn't likely to cave on such demands.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,139
35,656
113
You keep forgetting Crow will become the Stanford president in a few weeks. He’s not thinking about what’s in the best interest of AZ or even ASU - he’s thinking about what’s best for Stanford. Which is why he’s a conflict of interest.
I heard Robbins is the one who is likely going to Stanford, not Crow.
 

cayin

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
10,113
10,379
113
You have to laugh at this thinking. So they are going to forego the security of being in the B1G and eventually being on equal footing financially to have a better chance of getting their ass handed to them in CFP once a year. Meanwhile they would fall behind financially and get zero exposure when they aren't in the CFP. Makes no sense.
and Oregon will be able recruit the athletes to compete in the Big 10 just fine. They will win enough to make a 12 team playoff and now and then.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NorthCyd

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,489
74,198
113
Ankeny
You keep forgetting Crow will become the Stanford president in a few weeks. He’s not thinking about what’s in the best interest of AZ or even ASU - he’s thinking about what’s best for Stanford. Which is why he’s a conflict of interest.

If you ask their fans he hasn't acted in the interest of ASU sports in 20 years. So i'm not sure the stanford part is really a change for him