As stated so frequently: GOR? Net vs gross? Term? Spin? So many factors discussed, but still under shroud. I live/die B12, but lived in P12 area for most of my life. Best friend deep in Pac12 until 3 years ago. Said mgmt sucked. Was forced into severance package. He still thinks they manage to stick together.If you read the Denver Post article, their chancellor repeated what some other PAC ADs and Presidents have said about being 3rd highest in revenue when it's over. Now have they seen preliminary numbers that they keep saying it? Or are they setting the expectations so they leave with less-than-ideal numbers? Altimore believes the first. Scheer believes the second. I've seen estimates by Twitter people from $19M each to $40M each, I really don't buy either extreme here. The slightly more sourced people (that still don't know crap) have been from $25M to $32M, and I believe these are possible. Guessing those pushing $28 are going with the law of averages. It sounds like we're gonna know soon. Even if Altimore wins this round, he doesn't seem to understand that all the speculation of teams leaving is going to return as the new contract gets closer to expiring.
Don't disagree, but the messaging will be its "on par" and the streaming and PACN show how avant-garde they are and how this is the future, and they will be dominant in just a few years.And how does the PAC spin $28M into a win?
It's sure as **** not SEC money. It's not enough to "go shopping" for Big 12 schools
Their ass of a commish has put them into a wonderful lose-lose position even if they stay together
Just define "linear" as the PAC 12 Network and spike the ball.
Don't disagree, but the messaging will be its "on par" and the streaming and PACN show how avant-garde they are and how this is the future, and they will be dominant in just a few years.
It's total BS, but that will be GK's message I would think.
And then if it IS "gross" not "net" - CU and AZ will bail due to money, and GK will act all "shocked and betrayed" about it.
It was a layup. But they didn't say they would make it.Thought it was a “layup” that they would beat the Big 12 deal?
They must have Rob Jones shooting the ball.It was a layup. But they didn't say they would make it.
Poor Rob. But yeah.They must have Rob Jones shooting the ball.
The pro PAC Colorado fans are saying that the above proves they left hastily and no reason to do so again. Well, they could look at it as a chance to right a wrong by going back to the Big 12.
It also includes a Pac-12 with the Los Angeles market.I’m as pro B12 as anybody but that $70M figure includes a comparison to a conference with OU and UT as members.
Which do you think is the bigger loss?It also includes a Pac-12 with the Los Angeles market.
I would say the current situation would suggest it will be a bigger loss for the PAC. I guess time will tell.Which do you think is the bigger loss?
You just have to go back a long ways I would guess early 90s? Ucla/usc were still relevant and Oregon was taking off Washington was ok. It actually used to be decent. Now not so much.Is this the most the media has ever paid attention to anything related to the PAC-10?