Realignment is ALL about TV money. It's not about jerk fans or great places to visit. It's about schools that can bring the Big12 more than $31.7M annually. For the Big12 they are two keys to that criteria: Brand & Winning Programs.
I understand people's takes on Oregon/Washington- if they aren't committed, why add them? We can all speculate what the next round of TV media rights will look like in 2030, but does anyone know for certain? So if Oregon & Washington can strengthen the Big12's product over the next 5-6 years, why not bring them on board. The Big12 can always incorporate an exit fee if they leave, regardless of GOR.
Same goes for Utah. If they can help the Big12 compete against the SEC & Big10 on the field/court, bring them on!! I don't fault Utah fans for being defensive, condescending, etc. etc. it's just human nature when the status quo is threatened. As Cyclone fans, we should understand this more than most fan bases based on what the Big12 has gone through with realignment speculation over the last decade.
I understand people's takes on Oregon/Washington- if they aren't committed, why add them? We can all speculate what the next round of TV media rights will look like in 2030, but does anyone know for certain? So if Oregon & Washington can strengthen the Big12's product over the next 5-6 years, why not bring them on board. The Big12 can always incorporate an exit fee if they leave, regardless of GOR.
Same goes for Utah. If they can help the Big12 compete against the SEC & Big10 on the field/court, bring them on!! I don't fault Utah fans for being defensive, condescending, etc. etc. it's just human nature when the status quo is threatened. As Cyclone fans, we should understand this more than most fan bases based on what the Big12 has gone through with realignment speculation over the last decade.