Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

SEIOWA CLONE

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2018
6,793
6,989
113
63
The difference isn't about revenue. It is about LA, academics, and fit. SDSU is the most palatable by far. Getting the PAC to spend up on them (not unequal revenue sharing) or even taking them if AZ wanted them in order to retain a presence in southern CA, is plausible, although not probable.



I am not for it, but I don't agree we can unequivocally say that a G5 that part of the Big 12 wanted over Houston last year, is unequivocally not a factor in this. Communicating we are open to adding SDSU with AZ, if AZ is favorable to it, makes sense.
The B12 has bigger and better schools to go after than SDSU, it's that simple, taking them or not taking them does not affect whether the P12 survives or not.

Right now, SDSU is a filler school to get to an even number, just like Memphis and a few other schools, they are not a key piece of any puzzle to destroy the P12, nor to ensure that the Arizona schools move to the B12. That is all over money, and which conference can provide more of it.
 

Klubber

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
1,780
2,096
113
Aurora, IL
We've been working on the AZ schools for awhile. And the PAC schools need far less vetting than G5s.

Speedy is nuts, the timeline is more than within reason. Whether it occurs or not is dependent in part on Yormark's ability to convey the risks to the 4 corners in waiting.

Those risks are not fabrication. If the value in the 4 corners in Big 12 is limited enough for them to wait, then it is limited enough for the Big 12 to not need to take all if the PAC is already dead.

And let's be honest, WVU and Cincinnati would have no issue with the ACC being the base of the best of rest conference. Playing with the current ACC for even a limited time of value to them. If they were to jump, it is very plausible we are one more school away from the Big 12 racing to get in the ACC. Say KU leaving to be with UNC, Duke, UVa, Louisville, Cuse etc. That protects their top asset. At that point, the ACC has its pick of Big 12 schools, and would be bias to get dissolution (6 of R8). There is not room for two AZ schools imo. And if Oregon, UW, and Cal are not in BIG, there may not be room for 2-3 of the 4 corners.
I just don't see the ACC being an attractive option for anyone at this point .

The ACC is really in no position to poach from any other P5 conference. Cincy and WV were there for the picking if the ACC wanted them. Now you'd be talking about a huge amount of money for both to leave the BIG XII, and leave before they've even had a chance to earn full shares in the Big XII.

That would be a financial disaster for Cincy. Throw in the fact that the ACC earns less in TV revenue than the Big XII, is locked into a horrible media deal, and whose top teams are trying to get into the SEC.

The remaining PAC schools I guess could consider it, but the Big XII would be still be the better deal stability wise and money wise IMO.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2speedy1

Clonefan94

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
11,191
6,227
113
Schaumburg, IL
The difference isn't about revenue. It is about LA, academics, and fit. SDSU is the most palatable by far. Getting the PAC to spend up on them (not unequal revenue sharing) or even taking them if AZ wanted them in order to retain a presence in southern CA, is plausible, although not probable.



I am not for it, but I don't agree we can unequivocally say that a G5 that part of the Big 12 wanted over Houston last year, is unequivocally not a factor in this. Communicating we are open to adding SDSU with AZ, if AZ is favorable to it, makes sense.
Can we change the name of this thread to SDSU to the Big 12? Jesus Christ, give it a rest. I thought you said you were done arguing this ****.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: 2speedy1

Arkansas Cyclone

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
2,862
702
113
Bentonville, Arkansas
Just when I thought some of these articles couldn't get any more delusional, up pops this gem. According to this guy, the Big 12 is apparently reeling.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: timinatoria

knowlesjam

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2012
4,325
4,776
113
Papillion, NE
Just when I thought some of these articles couldn't get any more delusional, up pops this gem. According to this guy, the Big 12 is apparently reeling.

Man, next thing you know Iowa will be trying to woo Iowa State away from the Big 12...
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,962
113
Just when I thought some of these articles couldn't get any more delusional, up pops this gem. According to this guy, the Big 12 is apparently reeling.

I'm not clicking that link to give that fool clicks.

What's his source? The man who lives in his finger?
 

Kinch

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2021
5,762
5,859
113
The reason we hired Yormark was not just to be a deal maker, but more importantly to be a disrupter. I don't think it is an accident that we get rumors like the Big 12 courting Minnesota.
 

HouClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
2,818
2,188
113
Houston
The reason we hired Yormark was not just to be a deal maker, but more importantly to be a disrupter. I don't think it is an accident that we get rumors like the Big 12 courting Minnesota.
Even Yormark wouldn't float the idiotic Minnesota rumor. That is a rumor started by the author or the author's brother on a bet probably that the editor would miss allowing it to go into the story.

I agree we are already seeing disruption with the Yormark hire. Nice to see the Pac-12 getting rattled with the leaks to Brett McMurphy, Dennis Dodds, etc. Feels good not to be on the reactive side for once.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,999
20,962
113
I disagree. If their payout stays above the MWs, which is at 4 million, the Pac survives. What that looks like if Oregon and Washington leave is probably above that but not by much. The number to get SMU from the American is likely 6 or 7 mil which is the ballpark of the Americans ESPN deal.

If whoever is left does have a higher earning potential than 4 mil then they can get someone to jump from the Mountain West. Theres no reason for the conference to fold if its still more profitable than the one it would raid
That's why when I talk about the PAC surviving, I add the "...as a power conference." If it's a conference without Oregon and UW, it's not going to be a power conference any more. And it might be the "PAC," but it's just another G5/6 conference with a name that has history. A conference that replaces top PAC brands with MWC names might still be called the PACX, but that's just in name only.
 

12191987

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2012
2,340
2,601
113
The Big 12 is not trying to get Minnesota. Jesus ******* Christ. No one is leaving the Big 10.
Seems like you could make a pretty compelling pitch. Something like:

Look, you’ve been in a rut for long time. ****, you’ve been playing some of these same teams for over 125 years!

We can offer you a fresh start. Nobody knows your past. Nobody will expect you to play the same old role.

It is whole new life. That kind of thing is priceless, yet isn’t gonna cost you more than $50-60M a year. Most likely not much more than that anyway…
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HouClone

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
I just don't see the ACC being an attractive option for anyone at this point .

The ACC is really in no position to poach from any other P5 conference. Cincy and WV were there for the picking if the ACC wanted them. Now you'd be talking about a huge amount of money for both to leave the BIG XII, and leave before they've even had a chance to earn full shares in the Big XII.

That would be a financial disaster for Cincy. Throw in the fact that the ACC earns less in TV revenue than the Big XII, is locked into a horrible media deal, and whose top teams are trying to get into the SEC.

The remaining PAC schools I guess could consider it, but the Big XII would be still be the better deal stability wise and money wise IMO.
Maybe so.

But WVU wouldn't mind jumping to the ACC, with worst case scenario they traded out BYU, KSU, and maybe ISU for their old Big East rivals. Cincy likely similar, and is on partial shares for 3 years in Big 12.

What do you think happens if those two were to jump? If UNC is still in the ACC, I don't see KU minding the fact they demote KU to Mountain West in exchange. The Texas schools all help ACC Network make more.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: 2speedy1

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,445
28,798
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
The reason we hired Yormark was not just to be a deal maker, but more importantly to be a disrupter. I don't think it is an accident that we get rumors like the Big 12 courting Minnesota.
A rumor like that coming from Yormark would make me strongly question his judgment. It makes the Big 12 look silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,134
7,734
113
Dubuque
I disagree. If their payout stays above the MWs, which is at 4 million, the Pac survives. What that looks like if Oregon and Washington leave is probably above that but not by much. The number to get SMU from the American is likely 6 or 7 mil which is the ballpark of the Americans ESPN deal.

If whoever is left does have a higher earning potential than 4 mil then they can get someone to jump from the Mountain West. Theres no reason for the conference to fold if its still more profitable than the one it would raid

Maybe in name only does the Pac12 survive. Because other than Oregon State, Washington State and maybe Cal- every other team would find a new home. If George K presents Pac 12 schools a media deal under $35M/school/year- pretty good chance schools are going to jump ship.

If the Big10 or SEC don't take the Pac12 schools, the Big12 will.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
The reason we hired Yormark was not just to be a deal maker, but more importantly to be a disrupter. I don't think it is an accident that we get rumors like the Big 12 courting Minnesota.

There’s no disruption value. No one believes it. And if it occurred, no one cares.MN doesn’t really help the Big 12, and the Big 12 certainly doesn’t help MN. One more spot for another school.
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,634
7,487
113
I mean this sincerely I think this weird online market of young women making a living off sticking their butt out on instagram is honestly just gross. I guess I've become a prude in my old age.
I guess if it is an asset you got, then use it. My only issue is if they do this, or similar, I get annoyed when they then complain that they are getting objectified. Of course you are. This is what you want, this is how you get attention, it is the entire point of what you do, and how you do it.

Then they call men pigs etc for looking, even though that is exactly what their entire point of doing what they're doing is. It is just that when you put out a little honey you don't just attract your ideal audience, you attract them all, so they can't complain that they attracted the undesirable audience as well as their desirable.

That is just my 2 cents on that.