Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

Boxerdaddy

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,270
1,329
113
47
Beaverdale, IA
We will not TAX additional teams as they enter our BIG 12 (P3) kingdom. Four additions will make 16. Gradual additions make a final 24 teams!
_________________________________________________________________________________

View attachment 100563 View attachment 100564
Ha! The Big 12 lives on! Or, call it the Big 16, Big 18, Big 20, Big 22, and finally the Big 24! Someone will come up with a good name. I hope the "Big 12" can rise above the potential ashes of the PAC 12 and ACC. And I will be very happy if ISU stays alive in a future P3 conference, whatever happens. We have the fan support!!! We can do this. Stick together 12!
My suggestion is BIGXIIxII

Like Big( 12*2) =24
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: nwiacyclonefant

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,771
13,412
113
My suggestion is BIGXIIxII

Like Big( 12*2) =24
Seems like the Big 12 is in a good position, doesn't it? It would be nice thinking of some new type of branding for the Big 12.

But we have our friends (sic) at espn and fox. I won't feel good until we are in as a solid P3. Next couple of weeks, or even sooner, should be big. I meant to be a little funny. It is taxing though. Gonna be some losers in more ways than one.
 

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,005
3,120
113
West Virginia
I’d argue build to their needs isn’t entirely accurate.

California Memorial Stadium was reduced from a capacity of ~72K to ~63K during a seismic retrofit and modernization. This reduction was driven by the desire/need to stay within the envelope of the stadium, not because of declining demand. I can assure you that as the project was being formulated Cal had plenty of games at that 72K capacity and nary a ticket to be had.

The culture is just different. The demand is driven much more by on-field success. If Cal were to field a playoff contender they’d be able to fill up a stadium of virtually any size. If they’re relegated to some middlin’ MWC-esque league and continue to struggle, my guess is the floor is ~30-35K average.

Maybe it just means less? It certainly does compared to football crazed places like Texas. I mean, you won’t see Pac-12 teams showing the initiative to put up tarps when nobody shows up to see their loser teams (Right, Baylor?).

Honestly, I think a lot of this talk is the same regional bias/ignorance ISU faces outside the plains region.
All I remember while living in the Bay Area for 15 years and attending a few games were the tarps covering the end zones to hide the empty seats, the very fragmented tailgating, the horrific parking, and the horrible games.
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
And even with the GOR ending/waiting to the end there is still exit fees to leave. It is just the GOR is a much larger exit penalty if you leave early. Leaving for just a couple million is probably not beneficial unless you see a huge future gain. A school leaving would lose money for years paying the exit fee, plus most likely a reduced share of any conference they join for a while. My guess is if its not a substantial benefit, the moves wont happen.

It was a fun couple of days to think poaching 4/6 from the Pac-12 was a sure thing. Still definitely could happen but I think the most likely outcome for the rest of this year is the most boring one: Nothing else changes.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,818
24,925
113
It was a fun couple of days to think poaching 4/6 from the Pac-12 was a sure thing. Still definitely could happen but I think the most likely outcome for the rest of this year is the most boring one: Nothing else changes.

I still think something will happen before next summer. Doesn't look like next week like many hoped for, but I don't see the PAC schools entering an agreement that will pay them significantly less than they were getting before. So once the bids come back for the new PAC TV deal and the Big12 has an opportunity to get estimates for them adding teams I think you'll see more movement. As with anything, this will come down to whether the TV partners want this to happen. Does ESPN want 4 more teams in the Big12 for their content, or does FOX want to overpay to keep the PAC alive and thus keep more content there?

I don't think the PAC schools want to go into the 2023-24 (last season of their current deal) without a plan in place. So I'd look for something to happen during this school year. One way or another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhoISthis

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,846
2,723
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Pretty sure neither of them have one. And they don’t need one either. It was only the PAC, ACC, and Big 12 in order to keep their big brands from leaving in the meddle of a media deal and thus, damaging other schools.

Both of their TV contracts have GOR attached during the length of the contract.

This is why NOBODY wants the GOR to get challenged in court. If a precedent is set, it would impact all conferences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhoISthis

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,290
55,197
113
It was a fun couple of days to think poaching 4/6 from the Pac-12 was a sure thing. Still definitely could happen but I think the most likely outcome for the rest of this year is the most boring one: Nothing else changes.

So 200+ pages with about a million scenarios, retweets, article postings, etc. and...status quo?

Internets winning.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,659
63,731
113
Not exactly sure.
And even with the GOR ending/waiting to the end there is still exit fees to leave. It is just the GOR is a much larger exit penalty if you leave early. Leaving for just a couple million is probably not beneficial unless you see a huge future gain. A school leaving would lose money for years paying the exit fee, plus most likely a reduced share of any conference they join for a while. My guess is if its not a substantial benefit, the moves wont happen.
Maybe this is what the OuT payments will be held for. Use those to buy the exit for a few teams. If that helps to bolster our league it helps us even if we don’t see those funds directly.
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,639
7,501
113
It was a fun couple of days to think poaching 4/6 from the Pac-12 was a sure thing. Still definitely could happen but I think the most likely outcome for the rest of this year is the most boring one: Nothing else changes.
I think we all need to realize these things a lot of times don't happen overnight. Sure we see the OuT, and the USCLA moves and think they happen instantly, but those moves had been in the works for weeks/months. They had time to number crunch and work out all the details.

When it is a school going from a G5 to a P5, it is a no brainer for the G5 team, it is just the P5 that has to make the numbers work. So it is an easier move.

But now we are talking P5 teams possibly switching P5 conferences. I know the Media jumps on this and we all take the bait, but I am sure it is not an instant situation. I am sure calls have been and are being made between everyone as have been reported. Whether or not there have been any form of applications or invites I doubt. My guess is everyone is weighing interest. Schools are calling conferences and vice versa, and seeing who is interested and who is not.

Now we are in the number crunching phase. Where schools and conferences are coming up with numbers to see what is the best outcome.

We could still see movement, but It is not going to be as instant as some want or believe. There is going to be wild speculation continuing until either someone does move or until some contracts get signed.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: JM4CY and ruflosn

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2012
9,884
9,631
113
Rural U.S.A.
ND's deal with NBC for FB runs through 2025, so unless NBC is willing to let them out of the current contract, there isn't an urgent reason for ND to move on. Could be the buyout clause isn't a big hurdle and Big10 money talks.

Heck, if NBC is serious about televising football, they could cobble together a new conference with ND, Pac 12 & Big12 teams. The word out of the Big10 TV deal presentations was NBC was interested in televising a Big10 game before/after ND Games.

ND's Athletic Director brought up the potential for two versions of college football in the future:
  1. A version where FB programs are spun off from the university, players are paid and don't have to go to class.
  2. The traditional student-athlete model with true NIL.
So maybe ND wants to see how NCAA Reorg plays outs before jumping into a 10 year TV GOR deal with the Big10.


Or CBS? A new conference which is basically the Island of Misfit Schools. Big 12/Pac 12/ACC leftovers with Notre Dame. Student Athlete model with true NIL. I'd watch it.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,516
74,267
113
Ankeny
I think we all need to realize these things a lot of times don't happen overnight. Sure we see the OuT, and the USCLA moves and think they happen instantly, but those moves had been in the works for weeks/months. They had time to number crunch and work out all the details.

When it is a school going from a G5 to a P5, it is a no brainer for the G5 team, it is just the P5 that has to make the numbers work. So it is an easier move.

But now we are talking P5 teams possibly switching P5 conferences. I know the Media jumps on this and we all take the bait, but I am sure it is not an instant situation. I am sure calls have been and are being made between everyone as have been reported. Whether or not there have been any form of applications or invites I doubt. My guess is everyone is weighing interest. Schools are calling conferences and vice versa, and seeing who is interested and who is not.

Now we are in the number crunching phase. Where schools and conferences are coming up with numbers to see what is the best outcome.

We could still see movement, but It is not going to be as instant as some want or believe. There is going to be wild speculation continuing until either someone does move or until some contracts get signed.
Even last year when those moves were more obvious for the g5 schools, it took a month and a half for them to be brought in
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JM4CY and 2speedy1

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
I think we all need to realize these things a lot of times don't happen overnight. Sure we see the OuT, and the USCLA moves and think they happen instantly, but those moves had been in the works for weeks/months. They had time to number crunch and work out all the details.

When it is a school going from a G5 to a P5, it is a no brainer for the G5 team, it is just the P5 that has to make the numbers work. So it is an easier move.

But now we are talking P5 teams possibly switching P5 conferences. I know the Media jumps on this and we all take the bait, but I am sure it is not an instant situation. I am sure calls have been and are being made between everyone as have been reported. Whether or not there have been any form of applications or invites I doubt. My guess is everyone is weighing interest. Schools are calling conferences and vice versa, and seeing who is interested and who is not.

Now we are in the number crunching phase. Where schools and conferences are coming up with numbers to see what is the best outcome.

We could still see movement, but It is not going to be as instant as some want or believe. There is going to be wild speculation continuing until either someone does move or until some contracts get signed.

A couple/few weeks is overnight in realignment Imo.

I think the thought it would be days was based in the notion ND was going to decide in days. The ND AD wasn't surprised by the offer, if you’ve listen to Swarbrick’s comments the last 6 months. It is just as likely he's de facto the one building out the BIG right now. Perhaps the SEC/ESPN gave them a very compelling counteroffer. If ND were to jump to the BIG tomorrow, I think we get the Armageddon action days after.

Now there is waiting because there is still uncertainty on what "PAC" these schools we are targeting would be leaving. And waiting is a good negotiation tactic if you think you have a spot in the Big 12 in perpetuity.

I don't think it is like last summer. It should be a little faster, if not for ND uncertainty. Pac12 discontent is not new, and everyone knew the TV deal was coming up for BIG and then Pac12. As you said, the USC and UCLA moves have been in the works for months. This isn’t a surprise to most schools involved and it is not a surprise to FOX at all.

Imo only ESPN potentially would need time to work on numbers, mostly because with ND involved and the threat of Pac18, the board has changed for them. Do they overspend to prevent anyone from making Big 18, which would make it harder for them to do anything in ACC and they don’t have a mass advantage over Fox.

Imo it is still likely we'll have a resolution of some kind within 30 days. Which seems nearly instant since we've been in the hotseat for 12+ years now.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: t-noah

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,898
74,615
113
America
I think we all need to realize these things a lot of times don't happen overnight. Sure we see the OuT, and the USCLA moves and think they happen instantly, but those moves had been in the works for weeks/months. They had time to number crunch and work out all the details.

When it is a school going from a G5 to a P5, it is a no brainer for the G5 team, it is just the P5 that has to make the numbers work. So it is an easier move.

But now we are talking P5 teams possibly switching P5 conferences. I know the Media jumps on this and we all take the bait, but I am sure it is not an instant situation. I am sure calls have been and are being made between everyone as have been reported. Whether or not there have been any form of applications or invites I doubt. My guess is everyone is weighing interest. Schools are calling conferences and vice versa, and seeing who is interested and who is not.

Now we are in the number crunching phase. Where schools and conferences are coming up with numbers to see what is the best outcome.

We could still see movement, but It is not going to be as instant as some want or believe. There is going to be wild speculation continuing until either someone does move or until some contracts get signed.

Even last year when those moves were more obvious for the g5 schools, it took a month and a half for them to be brought in
Nah. I’m team Swimmer dude. Bet something happens tomorrow morning.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
Nah. I’m team Swimmer dude. Bet something happens tomorrow morning.

That tweet said they were negotiating to join the SEC and ESPN is trying to void the TV deal with ACC. Your hyperbole is misplaced.

It is nearly certain that some ACC schools are trying to get themselves into a P2 (negotiating). Anyone thinking that would result in action, at all or within days, is adding their own twist.

ESPN has reasons to want to get out of the deal, one of which is as a means to more easily move ACC schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: keepngoal

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,516
74,267
113
Ankeny
That tweet said they were negotiating to join the SEC and ESPN is trying to void the TV deal with ACC. Your hyperbole is misplaced.

It is nearly certain that some ACC schools are trying to get themselves into a P2 (negotiating). Anyone thinking that would result in action, at all or within days, is adding their own twist.

ESPN has reasons to want to get out of the deal, one of which is as a means to more easily move ACC schools.

Yeah, I can't imagine an ACC move, with all the legal hurdles that are in front of it, would be something quick at all. If something gets announced soon on that front its because its been in the works for a long, long time (and it very well could have been!).