Those were the speeds I saw on the autobahn. Very few people were driving over 80mph.Imo 80-85 is where the you subconsciously say "this is fast enough". I dont think you'd see a whole lost of people going above that even if speed was unlimited.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those were the speeds I saw on the autobahn. Very few people were driving over 80mph.Imo 80-85 is where the you subconsciously say "this is fast enough". I dont think you'd see a whole lost of people going above that even if speed was unlimited.
The only reason cars are the "economic" choice is because we subsidize the hell out of fuel and car-centric infrastructure to lighten the load on consumers. Not to mention less noticeable things like parking being subsidized by businesses and taxes. And the cost of police, fire, paramedics who respond to millions of accidents every year. Not to mention the ways that cars owners cover the cost of the vehicle itself + maintenance + insurance...The economics don't support it. Not enough passengers to make the prices reasonable, which is a death spiral for such enterprises.
I didn't know deer ran that fast.This is what a deer does at 70 mph to a F150.

One thing that people never talk about are the speeds Iowa has in towns. We were in Palm Springs a couple years back and they had 50mph speed limits where ours would have been 35. I saw this all over California and Arizona. I'm not talking about 25mph zone in residential areas.
A perfect example: This stretch of Meredith in Urbandale is 35 mph, which is idiotic. There is literally nothing there to hit. While a couple miles over in Waukee on 6 or whatever it's called, it's 50mph even though there are tons of buildings/traffic. I actually emailed the person at Urbandale and his repsonse "It's because of future developement". You don't set speed based on the future. Also, it's a great place for the Urbandale police to hang out.
View attachment 171033
That's because that is what the people want (unless you want to force behavior).The only reason cars are the "economic" choice is because we subsidize the hell out of fuel and car-centric infrastructure to lighten the load on consumers. Not to mention less noticeable things like parking being subsidized by businesses and taxes. And the cost of police, fire, paramedics who respond to millions of accidents every year. Not to mention the ways that cars owners cover the cost of the vehicle itself + maintenance + insurance...
Doesn't sound economic to me.
Also, it's possible to shift priorities a bit if we're talking about a "balanced budget" and there's only a certain wedge of the budget pie available for these subsidies.
When I hear people talk about how bad traffic is in Iowa I always laugh and think of the 16 lane section of I-95 in Ft Lauderdale.You've clearly never driven in LA if you think 380 is even comparable.
You sure about that? Lotta people in this thread complaining about spending too much time in cars.That's because that is what the people want (unless you want to force behavior).
It's a stretch to go from "I hate traffic" to "I want to ride public transport".You sure about that? Lotta people in this thread complaining about spending too much time in cars.
yeah there are quite a few between here and the electric vehicle thread who would be better off on the bus.You sure about that? Lotta people in this thread complaining about spending too much time in cars.