No disagreement there. And there's really no excuse. Iowa is a state that produces D1 level OLs at a higher rate than probably any other position. As much as we all give credit to this staff for their evaluation and development, it has yet to occur on the OL. I know it takes longer to develop OLs than any other position, but it's been 5 years now. Chizik and McFarland put together a better OL in 2 years than we've seen under Campbell.
The first couple classes were almost all misses on the o-line. Many of them didn't last three years in the program. It's year five, but the first two classes basically put the o-line at year three. I'm confident in the direction now, though.I think a lot of the problems with the OL have been from the cupboard being pretty bare when Campbell got the Ames. I think a couple of the guys that were returning starters retired due to injuries, which further reduced the numbers. CMC tried to fill in the gaps with grad transfers and JC guys, a lot of which were not good enough or didn't show up, again making things worse. At this point he has a lot of HS guys that have been in the program a couple years, so hopefully we will be pleasantly surprised in 2020.
Funny how CMC has had pretty good luck with the DL. which is something that Mac and CPR struggled with a lot.
Maybe Phil Steele's magazine is being ghost written by David Ubben?
LOL! You didn’t want a guru, you wanted a wizard who could wave his magic wand and make everything better!Honestly our OL has been a letdown every year. TM was supposed to be a guru but never was. Hope I am wrong but the OL Coach has been a bummer.
TCU has a whole one returning starter there.I am not shocked. Steele puts a ton of emphasis on OL starts returning.
It's almost like CMC has some experience with what it takes to play on the D-Line at an All America or All conference level...Funny how CMC has had pretty good luck with the DL. which is something that Mac and CPR struggled with a lot.
Every year people get pissed at the predictions in both MBB and CFB. But in the vast majority of the years, we come in at or below those predictions - with some clear exceptions. We might have good years by our standards, but we’re going to have to do a lot more on a consistent basis before people start taking us seriously outside our bubble.
I don’t think there is a fan base in the world of sports that doesn’t rate their own predictions at least a little higher than outsiders. It might only be 1 line higher on a list like this, but outsiders that haven’t bought into an individual school’s echo-chamber of hype will trend towards historical norms.
Don’t get upset, prove them wrong.
It's almost like CMC has some experience with what it takes to play on the D-Line at an All America or All conference level...
Ubben's mailbag almost weekly discussed it. It's amazing he never came to a game.Well, Ubben never made it to Ames when he was the Big 12 writer for ESPN.com. I don't think he even ever covered a game involving ISU while at that gig.
So that makes him perfectly qualified.
I haven't seen a specific stat on that, but do remember numerous disappointments on 3rd and long situations. But according to Phil, they were surprisingly ranked 72 in pass efficiency defense. It's an area of needed improvement I didn't anticipate. But with more experience at CB, a healthy Greg Eisworth, and the return of Jaquan Bailey, they'll get just that.The only thing I'd rate as bad last year was 3rd and long defense. And it was absolutely horrendous. I swear once it got to be 3 and 10 or more Wayne Bolt was in the booth calling the defensive play.
I haven't seen a specific stat on that, but do remember numerous disappointments on 3rd and long situations. But according to Phil, they were surprisingly ranked 72 in pass efficiency defense. It's an area of needed improvement I didn't anticipate. But with more experience at CB, a healthy Greg Eisworth, and the return of Jaquan Bailey, they'll get just that.
There have been a lot of good players that have sucked at being coaches. CMC is just a good coach, and he sees things that some other coaches do not. The OL thing is just a series of unfortunate situations all happening in the first 2 years in Ames. Remember his first game for ISU he had zero returning starts, not starters, starts, on the OL. Campos broke his leg in spring drills....
The first couple classes were almost all misses on the o-line. Many of them didn't last three years in the program. It's year five, but the first two classes basically put the o-line at year three. I'm confident in the direction now, though.
All good points here. Steele and Forde are puppets to flunkies research and outdated analytics. Bias against B12 has to be factored as well. Honestly our OL has been a letdown every year. TM was supposed to be a guru but never was. Hope I am wrong but the OL Coach has been a bummer. The pundits laugh at TCU/TTU/KU and ISU as football teams. Cannot deny we have no history of winning or overcoming our deficiencies. Hate it but realistic.
That is one ding on CMC. Before he came along, Kirk could never say he had a winning record against ISU in 18 years of trying. I'm still pissed at CMC for saying he didn't think it was much of a rivalry.If you want better ISU has to beat the Univ of Everything er Iowa, just to get the attention of all these supposed brillant football forecasters......
Meh. Disappointed I can see, but pissed?That is one ding on CMC. Before he came along, Kirk could never say he had a winning record against ISU in 18 years of trying. I'm still pissed at CMC for saying he didn't think it was much of a rivalry.