*** Official Selection Sunday Thread ***

Dgilbertson

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2023
1,660
2,027
113
I wasn't aware Hawkeyes knew what class is
8a0e6abb11e413ce0158ffeee661636a.gif
 

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
Death. Taxes. Iowa state in the number 1 overall region
Overall #1 seeds started in 2004. Iowa State has been to the tournament 12 times since then. This is the 3rd time being in the same region.

2005 - #1 Illinois (Midwest) - Iowa State #9 in East
2012 - #1 Kentucky (South) - Iowa State #8 in South
2013 - #1 Louisville (Midwest) - Iowa State #10 in West
2014 - #1 Florida (South) - Iowa State #3 in East
2015 - #1 Kentucky (Midwest)- Iowa State #3 in South
2016 - #1 Kansas (South) - Iowa State #4 in Midwest
2017 - #1 Villanova (East) - Iowa State #5 in Midwest
2019 - #1 Duke (East) - Iowa State #6 in Midwest
2022 - #1 Gonzaga (West) - Iowa State #11 in Midwest
2023 - #1 Alabama (South) - Iowa State #6 in Midwest
2024 - #1 UConn (East) - Iowa State #2 in East
2025 - #1 Auburn (South) - Iowa State #3 in South
 

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,131
65,831
113
Colorado
Watching the end of the ESPN Final 4 picks waiting for the women's selection.

Do these guys ever pick anyone below a 1 or 2 seed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lafester

CycloneRulzzz

Gameday Guru
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 13, 2008
53,398
76,071
113
44
Nevada, IA
Overall #1 seeds started in 2004. Iowa State has been to the tournament 12 times since then. This is the 3rd time being in the same region.

2005 - #1 Illinois (Midwest) - Iowa State #9 in East
2012 - #1 Kentucky (South) - Iowa State #8 in South
2013 - #1 Louisville (Midwest) - Iowa State #10 in West
2014 - #1 Florida (South) - Iowa State #3 in East
2015 - #1 Kentucky (Midwest)- Iowa State #3 in South
2016 - #1 Kansas (South) - Iowa State #4 in Midwest
2017 - #1 Villanova (East) - Iowa State #5 in Midwest
2019 - #1 Duke (East) - Iowa State #6 in Midwest
2022 - #1 Gonzaga (West) - Iowa State #11 in Midwest
2023 - #1 Alabama (South) - Iowa State #6 in Midwest
2024 - #1 UConn (East) - Iowa State #2 in East
2025 - #1 Auburn (South) - Iowa State #3 in South

First of many factoids from our resident tourney expert. Love what you bring to cf this time of year.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,612
23,855
113
Macomb, MI
KenPom lines for some potential future games:

Lipscomb-12
Ole Miss-3.5
UNC-5
SDSU-7
Michigan State+0.5
Auburn+5.5

Literally said in the expectations thread that I think ISU can get past this MSU team. The fact that KenPom practically has it as a "pick 'em" confirms my reasoning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneErik

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
12,406
10,751
113
Des Moines
The 6 teams they played include #1 seed Auburn, #1 seed Florida, #2 seed Alabama and #2 seed Michigan State. They could have scheduled and played four lesser teams that were still in the Tournament and had a much better overall record and a solid record vs. Tournament teams. I think they simply were given the benefit of the doubt of being for playing 4 Major Teams that are all National Title contenders + @ Kansas and UCLA.

FWIW, ISU went 1-2 vs. this group of six Power OOC games they played. Not a UNC fan, but I think it is good they are in the Tournament. With all of the micro talk about Q1 and Q2 games with schools like Penn State, K-State and Okla. State (I think UNC would have beaten all 3), they are being recognized for the four bad ass teams they played OOC.

I will not be shocked if they beat San Diego State and Ole Miss and meet up with ISU @ Milwaukee. That would be a tough, tough game for Iowa State IMO.
Nah, they shouldn't have been in. 2 of those games you mentioned were in Maui so they didn't really ",schedule" them, it's just the way the bracket broke. Florida wasn't supposed to be this good either so there's no way they knew they were playing a 1 seed when the game was made.
 

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
Here is my first blog of the tournament:

Some tidbits in there:
- Kansas snaps a streak of 23 straight tournaments with a Top 4 seed.
- Purdue has the longest current streak of Top 4 seeds with 8.
- Houston is a #1 seed for the 3rd consecutive year.
- Out of teams with their tournament streak snapped, Colgate had the longest at 5 years.
 

AlaCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
5,535
6,735
113
Here is my first blog of the tournament:

Some tidbits in there:
- Kansas snaps a streak of 23 straight tournaments with a Top 4 seed.
- Purdue has the longest current streak of Top 4 seeds with 8.
- Houston is a #1 seed for the 3rd consecutive year.
- Out of teams with their tournament streak snapped, Colgate had the longest at 5 years.
Hate to hear it! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cy4Lifer

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,672
13,326
113
Interesting. I should have known that you would have a link to something like this.

As you might expect, these videos raise a few questions. For instance, what criteria is to be used for picking the top 8 (or top 4 teams) or scrubbing one team down a notch? The video refers only to "best" and "better" teams. Is it left to the committee members to determine their own criteria? Is it "best" at the moment? Or "best" for the season? Do they consider injuries, both early in the season and currently?

For instance, it still baffles my mind that a committee member could think that our non-conference schedule last year was more determinative of our quality as a team than our performance in the Big 12 tournament. The non-conference schedule is nearly irrelevant. You could have the worst non-conference schedule and lose every game, but then win every game in your conference and conference tournament by 40 points. Do you dock the team because it lost bad non-conference games in November? Or honor the team because it had great wins in January/February/March? I know what Vegas would say. But based on the logic explained last year, the committee might treat the bad non-conference losses as meaningful.
Your relevancy for meaningfulness and accuracy is noted.

And here we are in the present and now. I cannot wait. I don't think the results will be too bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cycsk

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron