***Official portal tracker thread***

I kind of wonder about Ryver Peppers. I think that he may have had the most potential of our RBs last year, but was injured. If he stays, between him and Francois and Flora, we have some decent backs. Could use one more though.
Apparently his injury was a torn Achilles, so with the severity of those I wonder his availability for next season. Regardless, I sincerely hope to keep him.
 
Not going to be the same defensive philosophy...the DC that MC hired doesn't run the same system so it is basically apples to oranges. MC isn't dictating what type of defense to run...but he is responsible for hiring the guy who will make those decisions. No doubt Heacock was awesome here...but there are other very good DCs out there in college football. Why is it hard to think MC couldn't hire a 2nd guy who is solid?
What does the defensive scheme have to do with it?

The point is that the defense largely carried the program during the Campbell era. And that defense had as little NFL talent over that decade as a P5 team could have in terms of NFL draftees. Yet that defense was one of the best in the country over a decade.

Campbell can and will hire a solid DC. But Heacock wasn't solid. He was a wizard that got more production from his talent than probably any coordinator in college football over that decade.

I'm just interested to see how the defense pans out because we've never seen a Campbell team without a Heacock defense.

We've seen consistently garbage special teams. We've seen a mixed bag from the offense with multiple OCs. We've also seen that offense be really good when it had a top 5 NFL QB, top 5 NFL RB, an NFL TE and two NFL WRs. Otherwise the offense has been mediocre to good.
 
The fact that Ryver Peppers hasn't announced anything publicly tells me that he and his agent are still negotiating with Rogers and Roehl.

Probably a dollars and playing time conversation, which will play out over the next week or so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny
Rogers wouldn't intentionally kill the tradition. Our returning roster is young and few in number. They may not even have the song memorized. If we struggle to win games, they won't get any practice. Who's going to enforce it?
How many fans know the fight song? We still have some returning players and I would guess that Roger’s asks if there are any ISU things that happens on a small scale that can continue.
 
I don't think Matt bringing players over is going to cause any riff in and of itself. It's going to take some time for these guys to get to know each other and trust each other, but - by all accounts - the kids he's bringing with him are pretty high character guys that aren't going to set off a locker room.

What this is ultimately going to come down to is who Matt is playing. Using your LB example, if he's willing to sit some combination of Bacon, Ebel, and Brezina but current/other incoming PSU guys because they're just not the best players at that position I don't think this spirals into anything that negative. However, if he's playing them over guys that are clearly better than it's going to reek of nepotism and create resentment in the locker room.

It's like the coach's kid on your sports team growing up. If he/she was really an outstanding player and the coach was as hard (or even harder) on their kid than the rest of the team it's usually not a problem. It's when the coach's kid doesn't deserve the playing time they're getting and/or there is double standards from the coach where things get messy.
It has already caused riff. There was a PSU player 2 days ago that entered the portal and cited on X it was disrespectful
 
With the current portal system being absolutely broken, let's just be happy they're on board for 2026. Anyone/everyone could be gone after one year.

You’re not guaranteeing that you keep them, but you’re giving yourself a head start and a leg up on retention, and that leg up isn’t included when you take a guy with only one year left.
 
I’ve noticed a lot of Jimmy’s portal gets have more than one year eligibility. We get a two for one.
Hope so. And, also hoping they're able to sign "two year" deals we've heard about being reported for other teams in the media.
 
You’re not guaranteeing that you keep them, but you’re giving yourself a head start and a leg up on retention, and that leg up isn’t included when you take a guy with only one year left.
People don’t like change really. So if you get them and they don’t feel disrespected, they will be content to stick around.
 
How many fans know the fight song?
When I went to orientation, they had us sit in one of the Carver auditoriums and sing it over and over.

I think singing the Bells of Iowa State is a Campbell addition. I'd like to keep that one.

I'd love to get the stats on how many fans know For I, For S, Forever? Most games, I feel like 1 out of 61,500 that knows the words. When they actually play it, which has been less. Heck, how many could identify it when played? Or who wrote it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StPaulCyclone
It's not so much the individual players as much as it is the numbers. No retention; basically burning everything to the ground and starting over at Ground Zero. No continuity of culture. The tradition of singing the fight song in the locker room after victories is probably dead. Not saying 2026 can't be competitive, but it's tough building from scratch in football. If this team manages to make it to a bowl game I'll be super happy.
The lack of retention was a need to clean house is what I am seeing and starting to believe. JFR was removing the entitled (Pick your own adjective here) from the locker room. Probably wasn't his first choice, but one to pay dividends down the road.
 
Someone should post a billboard in times square advertising all the money he spends to not win a championship.

He posted these yesterday on Twitter...he's such a tool. He's trying way too hard to make TT seem relevant. Nobody would go to that sh*tty-a** ghost town if he wasn't shelling out crap-tons of money. Such a d-bag. He's all that's wrong with this new world of college athletics.



 
He posted these yesterday on Twitter...he's such a tool. He's trying way too hard to make TT seem relevant. Nobody would go to that sh*tty-a** ghost town if he wasn't shelling out crap-tons of money. Such a d-bag. He's all that's wrong with this new world of college athletics.





Rich guy that needs to feel important and praised.
 
According to Matt, he left to be closer to his mom battling cancer and closer to his daughter going to college. Let's not invent reasons please.
Campbell has been very open about how important having the financial resources at PSU are in allowing him to compete at the highest level. It's not some secret. He certainly downplays it as "it isn't everything" but he doesn't pretend like it doesn't matter, and that it isn't a massively important thing that makes the job attractive.

Man, I don't get the weird need to run cover for Campbell or players that leave ISU. They left ISU for more money. Nothing wrong with that. And there's nothing normal about fans of a team thinking everybody should root for those guys.

No legitimate college sports team's fans root for guys that leave for other schools. That's just not normal.

It's a dumb entertainment product. These guys aren't off to go battle a terminal illness or fight in a war.

They're going to play for a (indirectly) competing organization because they can make more money than our university could pay them after cashing ISUs checks for the past couple of years. It's fine, nothing wrong with that. But the dorks wringing their hands over people possibly rooting against Pedo State make no sense.

But feel free to cheer for Matt if you want. His comment about how great Paterno and how much integrity he had should make you proud to be a Pedo State and MC fan.