Notre Dame to ACC as partial member

If this has everything to do with all sports EXCEPT football, why is this the main story on the football page of ESPN.com. hahha
 
My brother is a huge ND fan. Personally I would love to have had them join us, but something must have been wrong with the deal for the B12 not to have taken them up on it. Notre Dame games guarantee a see out unless you are Baylor :P And 5 games a year would at least guarantee a game with them every 3 years.
 
Anyone who is on the we need to snatch up BE schools before they are gone needs to take another look at the situation. The Big 12 has 10 teams that have enough value to have the conference be close to the highest yearly revenue payout for TV. Adding tier 3 rights held by the individual schools some Big 12 teams will probably be the highest paid in the nation for broadcasting (Longhorn network, OU). There is next to 0 threat of the conference breaking up due to the grant of rights and the TV contract is guaranteed money for the long haul.

To add we would need to go to 12 schools to make sense. So we would have to add 2 BE teams. There may be 2 Big East Schools that will hit the average Big 12 level, but they will not be teams that will warrant a higher payout from the networks enough to compensate for the splitting of the pie 2 more ways. Learn from the SEC adding mediocre teams from another power conference can be a bad idea.

If we're at 10 teams for the long haul we've gotta change our conference name.
 
Where's the money coming from to pay for ND's piece of the pie? I don't see the addition of nd in basketball to really affect an already stacked league so there won't be extra money there. Are two home football games against ND enough to bring in more TV money in football? It's the same problem the big12 had, do the other schools take a revenue hit to bring them in as a partial member?

Either I'm really underestimating the ACC's yearly attendance revenue/tv revenue or you're really overestimating it. Could be either honestly.

I don't know enough about the ACC's finances to know this but the only way I could see FSU leaving for the Big 12 is if the additional revenue gained by switching far outweighs the additional travel costs. They won't leave for an extra couple million a year but an extra 5-10 million it's certainly possible.
 
The 50 million is not signed yet, boy this is going to **** FSU off.
 
If I were a Georgetown or Villanova I'd be real ****** about this development. Maybe ND basketball doesn't add a lot of value to a conference like the Big 12, but the basketball only schools just saw themselves lose another quality conference opponent because the conference decided to favor the likes of USF football instead of what it built it's brand-name on. The basketball schools really need to push to break off into their own conference. I doubt they see much, if any of that football money and I'll bet they could steal the top-end of the A-10 and still be a conference that fetches a good TV contract from ESPN. Shoot, if the likes of Louisville and UConn want to pull all their sports minus football from C-USA2.0 and join as well, I'm sure they'd be happy to have them. But continuing to see teams like Syracuse, Pitt, and ND leave and get replaced with crap like SMU is hurting their basketball product. When do the basketball schools say enough is enough and try to get out of a bad situation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic
@franfraschilla: Wondering if Louisville is next shoe to drop in conference realignment.

You got to think BYU may end up being a possible option and will give up a lot to be a member of the Big 12.
 
Notre Dame can't steal the Orange Bowl from anyone the way I read the press releases. Notre Dame will share in the ACC's non-BCS bowl lineup, but not in the Orange Bowl itself.

This really has to be sour grapes for DeLoss Dodds. He publicly stated for quite a while now how he wanted ND in the Big 12 and how it was only a matter of time before it happened. Couple that with the flop so far that is the LHN, and things haven't been the best down in Austin for big, bad Texas.
 
i just don't see any single school, or combination of schools, that would dramatically improve our $20M/school deal as a 10 team conference.
 
kbohls ‏@kbohls Texas AD DeLoss Dodds told me two years ago ACC was saving last two spots for UT, Notre Dame. Guessing Irish picked ACC for easier BCS path.
 
Looks like the perfect time for Clemson and FSU to come on over. This doesn't do anything to sweeten the pot on the football side of the ACC, and 15 teams for basketball just seems awkward.
 
From SI.com:

The Notre Dame officials said the move will align the university with more like-minded schools in markets up and down the East Coast in which Notre Dame wants to gain exposure. Notre Dame had flirted with a scheduling arrangement with the Big 12 and joining that conference in other sports, but this move appears more logical than playing games in obscure Midwest markets.

"In any short-term way there's no financial benefit," the official said. "If we wanted to do something for money we would have joined the Big Ten. What it's really about is postseason play."

The official added: "It's a really good fit academically. There are sports that we're going to play, the non-football sports are very good and they're going to test us."
 
i just don't see any single school, or combination of schools, that would dramatically improve our $20M/school deal as a 10 team conference.

Is it still $20M after the deal that was announced on Friday?

The big question on ND: Does this trigger renegotiation of the ACC's media deals?

Smaller questions: Does this and the earlier unrest (FSU and Clemson) drive the ACC to expand further? Could they pick up the other pieces in the Big East and be the first to 16? Might be a smart move on their part to make sure they are one of the four 16 team conferences.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron