I think I am going to offer services to Athletes to setup their NIL as an LLC electing to be taxed as an S Corp for tax purposes.
I might as well profit on this as well.
I might as well profit on this as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The NFL has been sued (on behalf on Maurice Clarett IIRC) and the NFL won.Agree. Basketball with the G league basically handles the one year issue. Football with the 3 years from HS is the difficult one. Which to me, begs the question of why not sue the NFL to eliminate that rule. It’s not colleges keeping athletes out, it’s the pro ranks.
Believe a USC receiver (mike smith?) was in that also. I don’t understand how the NFL with a salary cap can exist but not the current model of the NCAA. I listened to stanz/woody podcast and that popped into my head a lot.The NFL has been sued (on behalf on Maurice Clarett IIRC) and the NFL won.
baseball you can go pro right away or go to college. Make all sports like this and then colleges can say, this is what we offer to play for us, a free education with many benefits, then the players arent being forced into college to make the pros.
Believe a USC receiver (mike smith?) was in that also. I don’t understand how the NFL with a salary cap can exist but not the current model of the NCAA. I listened to stanz/woody podcast and that popped into my head a lot.
Right. Universities already offer all sorts of "value" to athletes. Especially star players.Think there are already semi-pro teams where a players can try out for a position out of high school. Doubt it they're playing before 60000+ fans though, and making much money, maybe even less than our guys get as a stipend, but don't know for sure. Wasn't Park playing for some semi- pro team down south? Probably not the best medical care plan if you even make the team.
Anyway, doubt if I would be shelling out a few thousand for season tickets to see a minor league football team play.
We knew it was coming, but the NCAA is officially throwing in the towel on NIL rights right before several state laws were going to take effect.
What's the next step for a school like ours?It will be interesting to see if any schools still hold out on this. It's well within their rights to do that, but they'd be putting themselves at a disadvantage.
I feel like the only schools that won't allow NIL are the academies. Other than that, we just entered a whole new arms race in the college sports world.It will be interesting to see if any schools still hold out on this. It's well within their rights to do that, but they'd be putting themselves at a disadvantage.
The school needs to come up with its own rules and have consultants on staff to help athletes navigate the issues.What's the next step for a school like ours?
Agreed. Very few schools are going to fight the current on this, but it's absolutely their right to do that if they want to. That's the whole point. There shouldn't be artificial limits on what schools can offer. Let the free market in.I feel like the only schools that won't allow NIL are the academies. Other than that, we just entered a whole new arms race in the college sports world.
We knew it was coming, but the NCAA is officially throwing in the towel on NIL rights right before several state laws were going to take effect.
Part of me thinks this is a good move, but having no limitations/regulations at all is a little worrisome. Could the schools just pay players and say it is for NIL? It might be a way to skirt around any Title IX implications.
The school needs to come up with its own rules and have consultants on staff to help athletes navigate the issues.
I would think so. They sell football jerseys every year and I would think that the player would now get a part of that cut.interesting question, schools could absolutely use athletes for advertising (they already do and have done so for years) will they now pay for that?
interesting question, schools could absolutely use athletes for advertising (they already do and have done so for years) will they now pay for that?
I would assume that when you sign an LOI, that there would now be language in there saying that part of your scholarship includes doing media appearances as needed. This would be similar to a professional contract in the NBA or NFL, their pay from the contract includes the player doing media appearances.
sure, I would assume that is how they do that now.
What I am saying is, what is stopping Iowa State from telling recruits that they'll pay them 20k a year in addition to their scholarship for use of their name image and likeness?