The running back has to stay in to block because our line traditionally has not been very good. But also like, 95% of Breece’s catches are him going out into the flat?
Also, you keep saying we don’t do short passes and I’m just not understanding where you’re coming from there. That’s the majority of our passing game. That’s how Jones racked up all the catches he did. We struggled so mightily against Notre Dame BECAUSE THEY TOOK THAT AWAY. We didn’t know how to adjust because it’s such a large part of our passing game. I have no idea what games you’re watching where you think we don’t do that.
Also, we run screens, just with Akers, not the running back. It’s no different.
Agree with most of your statements in this thread, but disagree with the bolded. Campbell and Manning will forget more football theory than most of us will ever learn, and they countered ND significantly with our last possession of the first half (clock management in the red zone notwithstanding).
In reality we have a couple of conflicts when the short to intermediate passing game is schemed away. First, we didn't have a line that could bully and lean on guys consistently to force more concern for the run game. Second, over correcting to just downfield throws will give a defense the opportunity to pin its ears back and create a whole other host of issues.
Lastly, as Jay as pointed out a number of times, towards the end of the season the offense has seen more combo coverage to take away timing and rhythm. This is something that can be countered with a more experienced play caller and QB, both of which should happen in the offseason and 2020.
Not that it matters much, but I thought Manning's initial gameplan and script was solid. Pull a LT to lead for Hall? Beautiful. Quick hits in the passing game to get the ball to our playmakers - basically what everyone wanted all season.
Problem again was spotty execution and getting behind on the scoreboard early.