Looking at WVU

Aclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2007
28,208
27,180
113
Des Moines, Ia.
Call this “Looking In your ‘Eers”

At first, I wasn’t planning on doing one of these for WVU. Pretty much all of their season long starts are nigh identical to ISU’s, it’s obvious that Neal Brown is a good coach. My only caveat would have been that the Mountaineers have yet to play either ISU or OU, two games that would likely shift the footprint of those statistics.

Then I happened to shift over to “conference only” stats, which offered a distinctly different picture. Turns out that when you subtract their 56-10 shellacking of Eastern Kentucky, it makes a difference. Yes, that WVU defense is still formidable (see reference to ISU and OU above), but the offense plummets.

Suddenly, WVU is a mere 8th in the conference in scoring offense, on a par with KState. The Mountaineers are at 25.6 ppg, while ISU is at 35.5 in conference play.

In Total Yardage, WVU still manages a respectable 416.7 ypg (again, sans facing ISU or OU’s defenses), while ISU is at 453.9 ypg.

The key difference is in a rushing game they seem proud of, where a Leddie Brown-led attack is only 8th in the conference at 132.3 ypg, and 3.6 ypc. Correspondingly, ISU averages 200.6 ypg rushing, and 5.6 ypc.

Jon Heacock must be salivating. Shut down a modest running game, and you can do all sorts of things defensively.

To be fair, in the passing game WVU is averaging 284.4 ypg to ISU’s 253.3, but I think that’s balanced by ISU’s 152.7 passing efficiency rating, to WVU’s more modest 133.7.

I’ll point out that passing defense has been this ISU team’s Achilles heel.

To complement those stats, I’d add that ISU is still in first place in the conference in sacks allowed at 9 in conference play, while WVU has allowed a more modest 15 (in one fewer game).

The very last stat that caught my eye, that wasn’t fairly even across the board, was in penalties committed. ISU continues to lead the conference in that category with the fewest (43 in 8 games), but WVU is right behind Texas at 9th for the most allowed (60 in 7).

Should be an interesting game. Go Cyclones!

 
They have a disruptive 3-man defensive front featuring two brothers (weird- so do we).

If we come slow out of the gate like we did against Baylor, we may not be able to recover. Hope we're firing on all cylinders!
 
Teams have struggled to cover Hall and our 3 TEs. WVU may be able to stifle things for awhile, but I don't see them being able to sustain it for 4 quarters. With Milton back and Shaw starting to produce, we are going to be able to move the ball. Hutch will have a better game. Texas did a good job taking him out of the game.

On the other side of the ball, we'll likely see a lot more of the bend/don't break style of defense where WVU may move the ball between the 20s, but struggle to get in the EZ.

We are better on both sides of the ball, play more disciplined and are motivated to send our seniors out with a win. With fans cheering them on, I envision a Sweet Caroline kinda day.

ISU - 31
WVU - 17
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snydes and Aclone
Call this “Looking In your ‘Eers”

At first, I wasn’t planning on doing one of these for WVU. Pretty much all of their season long starts are nigh identical to ISU’s, it’s obvious that Neal Brown is a good coach. My only caveat would have been that the Mountaineers have yet to play either ISU or OU, two games that would likely shift the footprint of those statistics.

Then I happened to shift over to “conference only” stats, which offered a distinctly different picture. Turns out that when you subtract their 56-10 shellacking of Eastern Kentucky, it makes a difference. Yes, that WVU defense is still formidable (see reference to ISU and OU above), but the offense plummets.

Suddenly, WVU is a mere 8th in the conference in scoring offense, on a par with KState. The Mountaineers are at 25.6 ppg, while ISU is at 35.5 in conference play.

In Total Yardage, WVU still manages a respectable 416.7 ypg (again, sans facing ISU or OU’s defenses), while ISU is at 453.9 ypg.

The key difference is in a rushing game they seem proud of, where a Leddie Brown-led attack is only 8th in the conference at 132.3 ypg, and 3.6 ypc. Correspondingly, ISU averages 200.6 ypg rushing, and 5.6 ypc.

Jon Heacock must be salivating. Shut down a modest running game, and you can do all sorts of things defensively.

To be fair, in the passing game WVU is averaging 284.4 ypg to ISU’s 253.3, but I think that’s balanced by ISU’s 152.7 passing efficiency rating, to WVU’s more modest 133.7.

I’ll point out that passing defense has been this ISU team’s Achilles heel.

To complement those stats, I’d add that ISU is still in first place in the conference in sacks allowed at 9 in conference play, while WVU has allowed a more modest 15 (in one fewer game).

The very last stat that caught my eye, that wasn’t fairly even across the board, was in penalties committed. ISU continues to lead the conference in that category with the fewest (43 in 8 games), but WVU is right behind Texas at 9th for the most allowed (60 in 7).

Should be an interesting game. Go Cyclones!


All very interesting stats. I saw someone claiming the Leddie Brown was the best back in the conference, but we all know better than that. They did slow Hubbard for OSU down, a little, but he is a shadow of what he was last year. I don't think OSU had a lot of guys back on the OL. Anyway, despite leading the conference in defense, they have given up some big chunk plays in the running game. Look for Hall to be well over 100 yards in this game. Their QB is nothing special based on what I have seem of him. WRs have speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aclone
They have a disruptive 3-man defensive front featuring two brothers (weird- so do we).

If we come slow out of the gate like we did against Baylor, we may not be able to recover. Hope we're firing on all cylinders!
Yeah I fear a bit of a letdown. Hopefully not. We start like we did against Baylor I don't see us coming back to get the W this week.