KU vs KSU Brawl

Discussion in 'Big XII Conference' started by yler4cy, Jan 21, 2020.

  1. randomfan44

    randomfan44 Well-Known Member

    May 30, 2015
    6,518
    448
    83
    Ratings:
    +2,990 / 452 / -73
    Huh? You carry on and on (and on) about the moral standards you prefer in your sports teams. It's not projecting anything, it's just remembering your post history.
     
  2. fcclone

    fcclone New Member

    Nov 15, 2009
    29
    3
    3
    Ratings:
    +42 / 4 / -3
    I do not think it was an acceptable response. In fact, I don’t think Dotson or the rest of the players that left the bench should have been allowed to play today. Both teams, not just KU.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  3. ImJustKCClone

    ImJustKCClone Well-Known Member
    SuperFanatic SuperFanatic T2

    Jun 18, 2013
    43,460
    7,960
    113
    Professional Pongid Pundit
    traipsing thru the treetops
    Ratings:
    +25,510 / 527 / -3
    I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure those were my first posts on this thread. And you're calling me pious...but I thought you were oh so respectful of other posters. Matter of fact, the post you called pious wasn't even in response to you.
    And yes, I want to be proud of my teams and the way they represent ISU both on and off the field/ court, and have been vocal about that fact. I don't find that to be a character flaw on my part, but maybe in KU fandom it is...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. ChampFantana

    ChampFantana Member

    Jan 30, 2009
    509
    18
    18
    Ratings:
    +88 / 65 / -1
    Congrats, I guess?
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. Cyched

    Cyched Minister of Culture
    SuperFanatic SuperFanatic T2

    May 8, 2009
    14,052
    4,462
    113
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +21,041 / 338 / -0
    LOL what?

    It was obvious watching as a neutral fan that he was trying to block the shot. It was so blatant that he tried to help Garrett up afterwards?

    Even Bilas was questioning the intent.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. randomfan44

    randomfan44 Well-Known Member

    May 30, 2015
    6,518
    448
    83
    Ratings:
    +2,990 / 452 / -73
    An Iowa State fan watching Kansas as a "neutral fan". That's a good one.
     
  7. Cyched

    Cyched Minister of Culture
    SuperFanatic SuperFanatic T2

    May 8, 2009
    14,052
    4,462
    113
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +21,041 / 338 / -0
    Yes, neutral. Idgaf who wins between KSU and KU
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. Halincandenza

    Halincandenza Well-Known Member

    Oct 24, 2018
    2,708
    346
    83
    Male
    Ratings:
    +3,409 / 365 / -23
    I think if they view it as an excessive foul to the head or neck area it will be a foul regardless of whether their intent was to hit their head or not.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Cyched

    Cyched Minister of Culture
    SuperFanatic SuperFanatic T2

    May 8, 2009
    14,052
    4,462
    113
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +21,041 / 338 / -0
    They’ve been pretty consistent in assigning flagrant 1s when contact is made with the face, regardless of intent. I think the block/hit on Garrett Saturday fell into that category and the call was correct
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. SCyclone

    SCyclone Well-Known Member

    Mar 11, 2014
    7,352
    3,379
    113
    Male
    Sales manager
    Fort Dodge, IA
    Ratings:
    +9,849 / 235 / -1
    You know, tuco, you've been on this thread for days now, explaining to the rest of us how Kansas takes the role of the big, bad villain in stride.....how they don't stoop to the Philistinian actions of their opponents, blah blah blah.

    And yet you don't see anything wrong with deSousa's standover? Somehow that's not a bush league action?

    I get these are kids, and athletics involve the release of adrenaline and testosterone. It's only natural that emotion will cloud a young man's actions. But don't give us the holier-than-thou speech when you're basically claiming Kansas is somehow above it all.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. VeloClone

    VeloClone Well-Known Member

    Jan 19, 2010
    34,423
    5,363
    113
    Male
    Brooklyn Park, MN
    Ratings:
    +19,124 / 295 / -4
    I watched that live and if it is the play I remember the guy went for the ball but went through Garrett's head to get there. It is totally inaccurate to say "no effort to block the shot". The F1 was appropriate. As I recall the guy didn't go after Garrett while he was on the ground, either.
     
  12. VeloClone

    VeloClone Well-Known Member

    Jan 19, 2010
    34,423
    5,363
    113
    Male
    Brooklyn Park, MN
    Ratings:
    +19,124 / 295 / -4
    #632 VeloClone, Jan 27, 2020
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2020
    I think Bilas was questioning the intent when the refs were going to the monitor and there was question as to whether it would be a F1 or F2. He was saying that it appeared there was intent to block the shot when he contacted the head so Bilas felt that the F1 was appropriate rather than an F2. I agreed with him when watching live and agreed even more when seeing the replay. I agreed even though I think Bilas is a pompous ass.

    EDIT: I stand corrected. I just rewatched and Bilas actually was saying he didn't think it was a flagrant at all. I disagree - if your actions are dangerous whether your intent or not, it warrants an F1. But in this case the guy tried to see if the player was okay and help him up rather than rush to him to stand over and woof at him.

     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. randomfan44

    randomfan44 Well-Known Member

    May 30, 2015
    6,518
    448
    83
    Ratings:
    +2,990 / 452 / -73
    Still waiting for all the outrage and calls for people to be thrown out of the sport after the huge brawl between the Texas southern and Alabama State women's teams. Dozens of punches thrown and landed. The longest suspension was a whopping 2 games.
     
    • Dumb Dumb x 2
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  14. derpyherky

    derpyherky Active Member

    May 11, 2018
    777
    189
    43
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,141 / 39 / -7
    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Funny Funny x 2
  15. VeloClone

    VeloClone Well-Known Member

    Jan 19, 2010
    34,423
    5,363
    113
    Male
    Brooklyn Park, MN
    Ratings:
    +19,124 / 295 / -4
    You are such a dork.
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
  16. ImJustKCClone

    ImJustKCClone Well-Known Member
    SuperFanatic SuperFanatic T2

    Jun 18, 2013
    43,460
    7,960
    113
    Professional Pongid Pundit
    traipsing thru the treetops
    Ratings:
    +25,510 / 527 / -3
    Don't hold your breath.
     
  17. simply1

    simply1 Well-Known Member

    Jun 10, 2009
    14,113
    1,742
    113
    Pdx
    Ratings:
    +6,923 / 218 / -4
    This is up there with dumbest all time post on this website.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. CyCrazy

    CyCrazy Well-Known Member

    Dec 17, 2008
    20,312
    1,390
    113
    Male
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +6,301 / 390 / -3
    Who ******* cares?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. randomfan44

    randomfan44 Well-Known Member

    May 30, 2015
    6,518
    448
    83
    Ratings:
    +2,990 / 452 / -73
    Sorry, it sure seemed like a ton of people here truly cared about the integrity of the game and the behavior of those in it. Lots of folks sure cared when it was a KU player who had "tarnished the sport and should never be allowed to play again".

    Now that it isn't a KU player, people suddenly seem less interested in adherence to such a lofty moral standard.

    Funny how that works...just found it interesting.
     
    • Creative Creative x 1
    • Dumb Dumb x 1
  20. VeloClone

    VeloClone Well-Known Member

    Jan 19, 2010
    34,423
    5,363
    113
    Male
    Brooklyn Park, MN
    Ratings:
    +19,124 / 295 / -4
    You seriously don't understand why there would be more interest in an incident in their own conference in men's basketball than an incident in mid/low major women's basketball?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1

Share This Page